Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T17:32:54.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The dynamics of trust across cultures in family firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Isabelle Mari
Affiliation:
Jönköping International Business School
Mark N. K. Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Denise Skinner
Affiliation:
Coventry University
Graham Dietz
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Nicole Gillespie
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Roy J. Lewicki
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

Summary

The aim of this chapter is to provide new insight into how chief executive officers of family businesses (who are themselves family members) create trust with the firm's owners. I argue that, in the family firm, three interacting subcultures (family, business and ownership) influence chief executive officer (CEO) and owner behaviour in keeping with their governance roles. Because of distinct values and norms of behaviour, the interactions of these three subcultures are often a source of interpersonal conflict, and often undermine relationships of trust built up over generations. Through an exploratory case study and application of the Economies of Worth Model, this chapter examines and illustrates how CEOs of family firms enhance their legitimacy and thus build, maintain, and repair trust.

Introduction

Around the world, family firms dominate the economic landscape (Chrisman et al., 2005; Morck and Yeung, 2004). Family businesses are those where ownership and management are concentrated within a family unit, and where its members work to achieve or maintain intra-organizational family-based relatedness (Litz, 1995). Their corporate governance structure may be composed of the same people, or at least people from the same family (Gersick et al.. 1997; Wortman, 1994). This overlap of ownership and management influences the relationships between the CEO, the board of directors and the owners, as well as the strategy of the family firm (Melin, 2001; Nordqvist, 2005). Indeed, their relationships are founded on three interacting subcultures (family, business and ownership) that may conflict.

Type
Chapter
Information
Organizational Trust
A Cultural Perspective
, pp. 383 - 404
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arregle, J.-L., Mari, I., Melin, L., Nordqvist, M. and Very, P. 2007. ‘Board creation and composition in family firms: a conflict-resolution perspective’. CeFEO Working Papers.
Alvesson, M. 1993. Cultural Perspectives on Organizations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002. Understanding Organizational Culture. London: Sage.
Beckard, R. and Dyer, W. 1983. ‘Managing continuity in family-owned business’. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggart, N. W. and Beamish, T. D. 2003. ‘The economic sociology of conventions: habit, custom, practice, and routine’. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 443–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma-Frankema, K. and Costa, A. C. 2005. ‘Understanding the trust-control nexus’. International Sociology, 20(3), 259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, G. T. and Moon, H. 2005. ‘The cultural mosaic: a metatheory for understanding the complexity of culture’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1128–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H. and Sharma, P. 2005. ‘Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory in the family firm’. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, September, 555–75.
Coicaud, J. M. 2002. Legitimacy and Politics: Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, G. and Salvato, C. A. 2004. ‘The board of directors in family firms: one size fits all?Family Business Review, 17(2), 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. A. and Herrera, R. M. 1998. ‘The social psychology of family shareholder dynamics’. Family Business Review, 11(3), 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P. and Harveston, P. 1999. ‘In the founder's shadow: conflict in the family firm’. Family Business Review, 12(1), 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘The phenomenon of substantive conflict in the family firm: a cross-generational study’. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 14–30.CrossRef
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, P. J. 1985. Organizational Culture. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., McCollom Hampton, M. E. and Lansberg, I. 1997. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of Family Businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Gómez-Mejía, L., Núñez-Nickel, L. and Gutiérrez, L. 2001. ‘The role of family ties in agency contracts’. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81–95.Google Scholar
Hall, A., Melin, L. and Nordqvist, M. 2001. ‘Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: exploring the role of cultural patterns’. Family Business Review, 24(3), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, D. T. and Lane, S. H. 2004. ‘Sustaining a family dynasty: key issues facing complex multigenerational business and investment-owning families’. Family Business Review, 27(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. R. 1983. ‘Transaction costs, property rights, and organizational culture: an exchange perspective’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 454–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, H. 1971. ‘Conflicts that plague family business’. Harvard Business Review, 49(2), 90–8.Google Scholar
Litz, R. A. 1995. ‘The family business: toward a definitional clarity’. Academy of Management Journal Best Papers Proceedings, 100–4.
Mari, I., Petit, V. and Arregle, J.-L. 2008. ‘Managerial legitimacy of top executives: a way to reconsider executive power in corporate governance?’ 24th EGOS Colloquium, Amsterdam, 10–12 July, 1–28.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. 1995. ‘An integrative model of organizational trust’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melin, L. 2001. ‘Understanding strategic dynamics in family businesses through an integrative approach’. Paper presented at Theories of the Family Enterprise: Establishing Paradigms for the Field – 1st Academic Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, September, 1–31.
Meyer, M. and Zucker, L. G. 1989. Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Möllering, G. 2005. ‘The trust/control duality: an integrative perspective on positive expectations of others’. International Sociology, 20(3), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R. and Yeung, B. 2004. ‘Family control and the rent seeking society’. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E. and Zahra, S. A. 2002. ‘Relational and contractual governance in family firms: effects on strategic decision making’. Family Business Review, 15(3), 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordqvist, M. 2005. Understanding the Role of Ownership in Strategizing. A Study of Family Firms. Jönköping: JIBS Dissertation Series No. 29.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. 1995. ‘The role of the founder in creating organizational culture’. Family Business Review, 8(3), 221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S. C. and Barsoux, J.-L. 2003. Managing Across Cultures. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H. and Dino, R. N. 2000. ‘Altruism and agency in family firms’. Academy of Management Proceedings, 11, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N. and Buchholtz, A. K. 2001. ‘Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence’. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and George, E. 2005. ‘Managerial trust building through the use of legitimating formal and informal control mechanisms’. International Sociology, 20(3), 307–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and Roth, N. 1993. ‘Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust’. Organization Science, 4(3), 367–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steier, L. 2001. ‘Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust’. Family Business Review, 14(4), 353–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thévenot, L. 2001. ‘Organized complexity, conventions of coordination and the composition of economic arrangements’. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyden, L., Blondel, C. and Carlock, R. S. 2005. ‘Fair process: striving for justice in family business’. Family Business Review, 28(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilaseca, A. 2002. ‘The shareholder role in the family business: conflicts of interests and objectives between non-employed shareholders and top management team’. Family Business Review, 15(4), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. L. 1987. Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ward, J. L. and Hendy, J. L. 1988. ‘A survey of board practices’. Family Business Review, 1(3), 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WortmanJr., M. S. 1994. ‘Theoretical foundations for family-owned businesses: a conceptual and research-based paradigm’. Family Business Review, 7(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×