Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:15:55.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - School Readiness and the Reading Achievement Gap: Can Full-Day Kindergarten Level the Playing Field?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Arthur J. Reynolds
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Arthur J. Rolnick
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Michelle M. Englund
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Judy A. Temple
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

In light of the trend toward high-stakes testing and other accountability demands, policy makers are focusing on the early childhood years as a crucial step in developing the competencies that form the basis of future academic success (Russell, 2006). In particular, there has been increased attention paid to ensuring that children enter school “ready to learn.” Although there is little consensus on the specific skills and knowledge that comprise school readiness, many educators, researchers, and policy makers adopt a broad perspective that extends beyond literacy and cognitive skills. The standards put forth by the National Education Goals Panel, for example, define five dimensions of school readiness: (a) physical well-being and motor development; (b) social and emotional development; (c) approaches to learning (e.g., curiosity, persistence, and other dispositions toward learning); (d) language development; and (e) cognition and general knowledge (Kagan, Moore, & Bredekamp, 1995).

Although the significance of early cognitive skills to school readiness is self-evident, it is also important to understand the role that nonacademic skills, such as physical and socio-emotional development, play in preparing children for school. Young children learn through physical exploration of their environments (Cassidy & Shaver, 1999; Smith & Pederson, 1988), and lags in the development of age-appropriate gross and fine motor skills (e.g., being able to run and skip or hold a pencil) can hinder their learning opportunities (Brown, 1982; Poest, Williams, Witt, & Atwood, 1990; Seefeldt, 1980).

Type
Chapter
Information
Childhood Programs and Practices in the First Decade of Life
A Human Capital Integration
, pp. 266 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, D. J., Barnett, W. S., & Robin, K. B. (2005). Making the most of kindergarten: Present trends and future issues in the provision of full-day programs. National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER). Retrieved from http://nieer.org/resources/policyreports/report4.pdf.Google Scholar
Agostin, T. M., & Bain, S. K. (1997). Predicting early school success with developmental and social skill screeners. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 219–228.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, D. H., Ortiz, C., Curry, J. C., Stowe, R. M., Goldstein, N. E., Fisher, P. H., Zeljo, A., & Yershova, K. (1999). Promoting academic success and preventing disruptive behavior disorders through community partnership. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(5), 589–598.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogard, K., & Takanishi, R. (2005). PK-3: An aligned and coordinated approach to education for children 3 to 8 years old. Social Policy Report, 19(3).Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1982). Exercise and mental health in the pediatric population. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 1, 515–527.Google ScholarPubMed
Cannon, J. S., Jacknowitz, A., & Painter, G. (2006). Is full better than half? Examining the longitudinal effects of full-day kindergarten attendance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Chase-Lansdale, P. L., Gordon, R. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1997). Neighborhood and family influences on the intellectual and behavioral competence of preschool and early school-age children. In Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G., & Aber, J. L. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children (Vol. 1, pp. 119–145). New York: Russell Sage Press.Google Scholar
Coley, R. J. (2002). An uneven start: Indicators of inequality in school readiness. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Center. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/research/dload/Unevenstart.pdf.Google Scholar
,Committee for Economic Development. (2002). Preschool for all: Investing in a productive and just society. New York: Author.Google Scholar
Cryan, J. R., Sheehan, R., Wiechel, J., & Bandy-Hadden, I. G. (1992). Success outcomes of full-day kindergarten: More positive behavior and increased achievement in the years after. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465–498.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (2001). Psychological statistics using SPSS for Windows. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaviside, S., & Farris, E. (1993). Public school kindergarten teachers' views of children's readiness for schools (NCES 1993–410). Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (1995). Reconsidering children's early learning and development: Toward shared beliefs and vocabulary. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (2002). Methodological advances in the analysis of individual growth with relevance to education policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(4), 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Y. A. (2005). Protective mechanisms that moderate academic risk levels in young children: HLM applications with the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS-K) kindergarten–first grade data set. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 66(1-A), 87.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence?Child Development, 70(6), 373–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, V., Kirby, S. N., Barney, H., Setodji, C. M., & Gershwin, D. (2006). School readiness, full-day kindergarten, and student achievement: An empirical investigation. MG-558-RF/FF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG558.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, V. E., Burkam, D. T., Ready, D. D., Honigman, J., & Meisels, S. J. (2006). Full-day versus half-day kindergarten: In which program do children learn more?American Journal of Education, 112, 163–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewit, E. M., & Baker, L. S. (1995). School readiness. Future of Children, 5(2), 128–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Long Beach Unified School District Office of Research, Planning and Evaluation. (2000). Research summary: Full day academic kindergarten. Long Beach, CA: Long Beach Unified School District.Google Scholar
McClelland, M. M., Morrison, F. J., & Holmes, D. L. (2000). Children at risk for early academic problems: The role of learning-related social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(3), 307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education (2000). Still unacceptable trends in kindergarten entry and placement: A position statement developed by National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education. Baton Rouge, LA: Author.Google Scholar
,National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). ECLS-K base year public-use data files and electronic codebook (NCES Report No. 2001029 rev.). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001029rev.Google Scholar
Phillips, M., Crouse, J., & Ralph, J. 1998. Does the black-white test score gap widen after children enter school? In Jencks, C. & Phillips, M. (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 229–272). Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Pianta, R. C. (2002). School readiness: A focus on children, families, communities, and school. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Eaton, J. J., Rapp, K. E., Lim, W., Nowak, J., Hansen, J. A.. (2004). The effects of full day versus half day kindergarten: Review and analysis of national and Indiana data. Indianapolis: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.Google Scholar
Poest, C. A., Williams, J. R., Witt, D. D., & Atwood, M. L. (1990). Challenge me to move: Large muscle development in young children. Young Children, 45, 4–10.Google Scholar
Porch, S. (2002). Full-day kindergarten. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.Google Scholar
Rathbun, A., & West, J. (2004). From kindergarten through third grade: Children's beginning school experiences. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Pianta, R. C., & Cox, M. J. (2000). Teachers' judgments of problems in the transition to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, C. E., Brooks-Gunn, J., & McLanahan, S. (2005). Introducing the issue. Future of Children, 1, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. L. (2006). An enduring tension: Kindergarten education in an era of accountability. In Miskel, C. & Hoy, W. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in educational policy and school outcomes (research and theory in educational administration) (pp. 215–240). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, V. (1980). Physical fitness guidelines for preschool children. Proceedings of the National Conference on Physical Fitness and Sports for All (pp. 5–19). Washington, DC: President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports.Google Scholar
Smith, P., & Pederson, D. (1988). Maternal sensitivity and patterns of infant-mother attachment. Child Development, 59, 1097–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Millburn, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children's achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66(1), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stipek, D. J., & Ryan, R. H. (1997). Economically disadvantaged preschoolers: Ready to learn but further to go. Developmental Psychology, 33, 711–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanFleet, W. (2002). All-day kindergarten report. Muncie, IN: Muncie Public Schools, Office of the Director of Elementary Instruction.Google Scholar
Walston, J., West, J., & Rathbun, A. H. (2005). Do the greater academic gains made by full-day kindergarten children persist through third grade?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
West, J., Denton, K., & Reaney, L. M. (2001). The kindergarten year: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, kindergarten class of 1998–99. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001023.pdf.Google Scholar
Zill, N. (1999). Promoting educational equity and excellence in kindergarten. In Pianta, R. C. & Cox, M. (Eds.), The transition to kindergarten (pp. 67–105). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×