Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:46:13.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Innovation and insufficient evidence: the case for a WTO–WHO Agreement on Health Technology Safety and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Thomas Pogge
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Matthew Rimmer
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Kim Rubenstein
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Health technology (particularly including pharmaceuticals and medical devices) constitutes an increasingly important item of international trade regulated by rules developed in large part by the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’). Affordable access to such technologies long will remain a critical factor in national responses to infectious disease pandemics, as well as the prevention of morbidity and mortality associated with disease, war and natural disaster. For many people such equitable access will continue to be a basic precondition to health. All nations have developed regulatory processes for scientifically assessing the public health impacts of such health technologies – mostly in relation to safety issues, but often concerning their cost-effectiveness or health innovation (that is, their objectively demonstrated therapeutic significance to a community).

The causes and social impacts of the current global financial crisis have heightened concerns about both the safety and cost-effective pricing issues associated with the development of, and global trade in, new health technologies for profit by private multinational corporations. The WTO has already forged an agreement utilizing scientific assessment of evidence to protect the public interest in relation to international trade of one group of products (quarantine and phytosanitary regulatory measures concerned with agricultural trade). This is the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (‘SPS Agreement’). The WTO has yet to seriously consider developing an Agreement on Health Technology Safety and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation (‘HSCE Agreement’).

Type
Chapter
Information
Incentives for Global Public Health
Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines
, pp. 209 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×