Report of the Select Committee on the Weavers' Petition, PP 1810–11 ii, 1.

Fifth Report of the Commissioners on the Courts of Common Law, PP 1833 (247).

Report on the Law of Partnership by Mr Bellenden Ker, reprinted as Appendix I of the First Report of the Select Committee on Joint Stock Companies, PP 1844 vii.

Select Committee on Investments for the Savings of the Middle and Working Classes, PP 1850 xix.

Select Committee on the Law of Partnership, PP 1851 xviii.

House of Lords Select Committee on the Bankruptcy Bill, PP 1852–3 xxii.

Royal Commission on the Assimilation of Mercantile Laws in the UK and Amendments in the Law of Partnership, as Regards the Question of Limited or Unlimited Responsibility, PP 1854 xxvii.

Select Committee on the State of the Laws as Regards Contracts of Service between Master and Servant, PP 1865 viii and 1866 xiii.

Return of the Questions Addressed by the Committee of County Court Judges to the Judges of Those Courts, on County Court Commitments, PP 1867 lvii.

Select Committee on Imprisonment for Debt, PP 1873 xv.

Select Committee on the Companies Acts 1862 and 1867, PP 1877 viii.

Report of the Royal Commission on the Stock Exchange, PP 1878 xix.

Report of the Chief Registrar of Friendly Societies for 1880. Part IIB, app. I pp 1883 lxviii.

Report on the Royal Liver Friendly Society, PP 1886 lxi.

Select Committee on the Friendly Societies Act, appendix 1. PP 1889 x.

House of Lords Select Committee on the Debtors Act, PP 1893–4 (HL) ix.

Report on Company Law Amendment Act, [Cd 3052], 1906 xcvii.

Annual Return Relating to Joint Stock Companies for 1906, PP 1907 lxxvi.

Select Committee on Debtors (Imprisonment) PP 1909 vii.

,A Member of the Institute of Actuaries, The Government Annuities Bill: A letter to the Rt. Hon. W.E. Gladstone, London, 1864.Google Scholar

,A Practical Jobber. The System of Stock-Jobbing Explained, London, 1816.Google Scholar

Abel-Smith, B. and Stevens, R.Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the English Legal System, 1750–1965, London, 1967.Google Scholar

Addison, C. G.A Treatise on the Law of Contracts and Parties to Actions ex contractu, London, 1845.Google Scholar

Aitken, J.Pride and Perjury, London, 2000.Google Scholar

Alborn, T. ‘The moral of the failed bank: professional plots in the Victorian money market’, Victorian Studies, 38, 199–226, 1995.Google Scholar

Alborn, T.Conceiving Companies: Joint-Stock Politics in Victorian England, London, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. ‘Production, information costs, and economic organisation’, American Economic Review, 57, 777–95, 1972.Google Scholar

Allen, J.Where Shall I Get the Most for My Money?, London, 1880.Google Scholar

Amsler, C. E., Bartlett, R. L. and Bolton, C. J. ‘Thoughts of some British economists on early limited liability and corporate legislation’, History of Political Economy, 13, 774–93, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, G. M. and Tollison, R. D. ‘Adam Smith's analysis of joint-stock companies’, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1237–56, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Anon. The Calumnious Aspersions Contained in the Report of the Sub-Committee of the Stock-Exchange Exposed and Refuted, London, 1814.Google Scholar

,Anon. The Case of Thomas Lord Cochrane, Edinburgh, 1814.Google Scholar

,Anon. Letter to the Electors of Westminster on the Case of Lord Cochrane, London, 1814.Google Scholar

,Anon. The Trial of Lord Cochrane, London, 1814.Google Scholar

,Anon. How to Make Money; or Hints to Speculators, Birmingham, 1857.Google Scholar

,Anon. Responsibilities of Directors and Promoters, London, 1873.Google Scholar

Anson, Sir W. R.Principles of the English Law of Contract, Oxford, 1879.Google Scholar

Arthurs, H. W. ‘“Without the law”: courts of local and special jurisdiction in nineteenth century England’, Journal of Legal History, 5, 130–49, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspinall, A. ‘The Westminster election of 1814’, English Historical Review, xl, 562–9, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atiyah, P. S.The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract, Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar

Atlay, J. B.The Trial of Lord Cochrane before Lord Ellenborough, London, 1897.Google Scholar

Babbage, C.A Comparative View of the Various Institutions for the Assurance of Lives, London, 1826.Google Scholar

Baily, F.An Account of the Several Life Assurance Companies Established in London, London, 1811.Google Scholar

Bain, G. and Price, R.Profiles of Union Growth, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar

Bakan, J.The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, London, 2004.Google Scholar

Banks, J. A. ‘The way they lived then: Anthony Trollope and the 1870s’, Victorian Studies, 12, 177–200, 1968.Google Scholar

Barber, B. ‘Absolutization of the market: some notes on how we got from here to there’. In G. Dworkin, G. Bermant and P. G. Brown (eds.), Markets and Morals, Washington, DC, 15–31, 1977.Google Scholar

Barnett, A. T.Why are Betting and Gambling Wrong?, London, 1897.Google Scholar

Barrister, A.Overend, Gurney & Co. (Limited): A Plain Statement of the Case, London, 1867.Google Scholar

Barton, J. L. ‘The enforcement of hard bargains’, Law Quarterly Review, 103, 1987.Google Scholar

Baskin, J. B. and Miranti, P. J.A History of Corporate Finance, Cambridge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, A. ‘The fire of London’. In his The Loot of the Cities, London, 1905.Google Scholar

Berg, M. ‘What difference did women's work make to the Industrial Revolution?’, History Workshop, 35, 22–44, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C.The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, 1933.CrossRef

Biagini, E. F. 1987, ‘British trade unions and popular political economy, 1860–1880’, Historical Journal, 30, 811–40, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biagini, E. F.Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880, Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar

Black, B. ‘Age and earnings’. In Gregory, M. B. and Thomson, A. W. J., A Portrait of Pay, 1970–1982: An Analysis of the New Earnings Survey, Oxford, 274–98, 1990.Google Scholar

Blackstone, Sir W.Commentaries on the Laws of England, Oxford, 1865–9.Google Scholar

Blaug, M.Economic Theory in Retrospect, London, 1964.Google Scholar

Boose, M. A. ‘Agency theory and alternative predictions for life insurers: an empirical test’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 57, 499–518, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boot, H. M. and Maindonald, J. H. ‘New estimates of age- and sex-specific earnings and the male-female earnings gap in the British cotton industry, 1833–1906’, Economic History Review, 61, 380–408, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourne, K.Palmerston: The Early Years 1784–1841, London, 1982.Google Scholar

Bower, T.Maxwell: The Outsider, London, 1988.Google Scholar

Bower, T.Maxwell: The Final Verdict, London, 1995.Google Scholar

Briggs, A.The Novels of Harold Frederic, Ithaca, NY, 1969.Google Scholar

Brooks, C.Lawyers, Litigation and English Society since 1450, London, 1998.Google Scholar

Bryer, R. A. ‘The late nineteenth-century revolution in financial reporting: Accounting for the rise of investor or managerial capitalism?’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 649–90, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryer, R. A.‘The Mercantile Laws Commission of 1854 and the political economy of limited liability’, Economic History Review, 50, 37–56, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunyon, C. J.On the Liquidation of an Insolvent Life Office, London, 1870.Google Scholar

Burnette, J. ‘An investigation of the female-male wage gap during the industrial revolution in Britain’, Economic History Review, 50, 257–81, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnette, J.Gender, Work and Wages in Industrial Revolution Britain, Cambridge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, G. G. ‘The economic analysis of labor market discrimination: a survey’. In O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam, 693–785, 1986.Google Scholar

Cairnes, J. E.Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, London, 1874.Google Scholar

Capaldi, N.John Stuart Mill: A Biography, Cambridge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr-Saunders, A. M. and Wilson, P. A.The Professions, Oxford, 1933.Google Scholar

Chadwick, E. ‘Results of different principles of legislation and administration in Europe, of competition for the field, as compared with competition within the field, of service’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 22, 381–420, 1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, A.The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA, 1977.Google Scholar

Cheffins, B. ‘History and the global corporate governance revolution: the UK perspective’, Business History, 43, 87–118, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiozza Money, L. G.Riches and Poverty, London, 1906.Google Scholar

Christie, R.Letter to the Right Hon. Joseph W. Henley, M.P., Regarding Life Assurance Institutions, Edinburgh, 1852.Google Scholar

Clapham, J. H.An Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. II: Free Trade and Steel, Cambridge, 1926.Google Scholar

Clapham, J. H.The Bank of England: A History, Cambridge, 1944.Google Scholar

Clements, R. V. ‘British trade unions and popular political economy, 1850–1875’, Economic History review, 14, 93–104, 1961–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocks, R. C. J.Sir Henry Maine, Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. ‘The history of imprisonment for debt and its relation to the development of discharge in bankruptcy’, Journal of Legal History, 3, 153–71, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colvin, A.Actuarial Figments Exploded: A Letter to the Right Hon. J.W. Henley, M.P., in Defence of Life Assurance Offices, London, 1852.Google Scholar

Conley, C. A.The Unwritten Law: Criminal Justice in Victorian Kent, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Cooke, C. A.Corporation, Trust and Company, Manchester, 1950.Google Scholar

Corley, T. A. B.Quaker Enterprise in Biscuits: Huntley and Palmers of Reading, 1822–1972, London, 1972.Google Scholar

Cornish, W. R. and Clark, G. de N. Law and Society in England, 1750–1950, London, 1989.Google Scholar

Cottrell, P. L.Industrial Finance, 1830–1914, London, 1980.Google Scholar

Cox, E. W.The New Law and Practice of Joint Stock Companies with and without Limited Liability, 4th edn., London, 1857.Google Scholar

Cracroft, B. ‘Analysis of the House of Commons in 1867’. In his Essays, Political and Miscellaneous, London, 1868.Google Scholar

Crew, A.Bribes and Bribery in Business, London, 1916.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. D., Rubio-Misas, J. D. and Zi, H. ‘The effect of organizational structure on efficiency: evidence from the Spanish insurance industry’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 3113–50, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, J. D., Weiss, M. A. and Zi, H. ‘Organizational form and efficiency: an analysis of stock and mutual property-liability insurers’, Management Science, 45, 1245–69, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, P. A. ‘Clio and the economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review, 75, 332–7, 1985.Google Scholar

David, P. A.‘Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics”’. In P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides (eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas, Cheltenham, 15–40, 2001.Google Scholar

Berenger, C. R.The Noble Stock Jobber, London, 1816.Google Scholar

Deakin, S. and Wilkinson, F.The Law of the Labour Market, Oxford, 2005.Google Scholar

Dennett, L.A Sense of Security: 150 years of Prudential, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Dent, G. M.A Dialogue Showing How to Select a Life Office, Manchester, 1888.Google Scholar

Dent, G. M.How to Select a Life Office, London, 1897.Google Scholar

Derry, T. K. ‘The repeal of the apprenticeship clauses of the Statute of Apprentices’, Economic History Review, 3, 67–87, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dicey, A. V.Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion During England in the Nineteenth Century, London, 1905.Google Scholar

Dickens, C.Dombey and Son, London, 1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diggle, Archdeacon. Speculation and Gambling, London, 1899.Google Scholar

Diggle, Archdeacon. Directory of Directors for 1898, London, 1898.Google Scholar

Dod, C. R.Electoral Facts from 1832 to 1853, London, 1853.Google Scholar

Doeringer, P. and Piore, M.Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis, Lexington, MA, 1971.Google Scholar

Duguid, C.How to Read the Money Article, London, 1901.Google Scholar

Duguid, C.The Story of the Stock Exchange, London, 1901.Google Scholar

Dunlavy, C. ‘From citizens to plutocrats: nineteenth-century shareholder voting rights and theories of incorporation’. In K. Lipartito and D. Sicilia (eds.), Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture, Oxford, 66–93, 2004.Google Scholar

Dutton, H. I. and King, J. E.‘Ten Per Cent and No Surrender’: The Preston Strike, 1853–1854, Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar

Dutton, H. I. and King, J. E.‘The limits of paternalism: the cotton tyrants of North Lancashire, 1836–54’, Social History, 7, 59–74, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eastwood, D. ‘Tories and markets, 1800–1850’. In M. Bevir and F. Trentmann (eds.), Markets in Historical contexts, Cambridge, 70–89, 2004.Google Scholar

Eden, Sir F.On the Policy and Expediency of Granting Insurance Charters, London, 1806.Google Scholar

Edey, H. C. and Panitpakdi, P. ‘British company accounting and the law, 1844–1900’. In Littleton, A. C. and Yamey, B. S. (eds.), Studies in the History of Accounting, Homewood, IL, 1956.Google Scholar

Edgar, A. ‘On the jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace in disputes between employers and employed arising from breach of contract’, Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 1859, London, 1860.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. R.A History of Financial Accounting, London, 1980.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. R.‘Companies, corporations and accounting change, 1835–1933: a comparative study’, Accounting and Business Research, 23, 59–73, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, G.The Mystery of Overend and Gurney: Adventures in the Victorian Financial Underworld, London, 2006.Google Scholar

English, H.A Complete View of the Joint Stock Companies formed during 1824 and 1825, London, 1827.Google Scholar

,Equity, and Law Life Assurance Society. Prospectus, London, 1891.Google Scholar

Essex-Crosby, A. ‘Joint-stock companies in Great Britain 1890–1930’, M.Comm thesis, University of London, 1938.

Evans, D. M.The City: or, The Physiology of London Business, London, 1845.Google Scholar

Evans, D. M.The Commercial Crisis of 1847–8, London, 1848.Google Scholar

Evans, D. M.Facts, Failures and Frauds: Revelations Financial, Mercantile, Criminal, London, 1859.Google Scholar

Feinstein, C. H. ‘The rise and fall of the Williamson curve’, Journal of Economic History, 48, 699–729, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinstein, C. H.‘New estimates of average earnings in the United Kingdom, 1880–1913’, Economic History Review, 43, 595–632, 1990.Google Scholar

Ferguson, R. B. ‘The adjudication of commercial disputes and the legal system in modern England’, British Journal of Law and Society, 7, 141–57, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, M. ‘Being in debt in Dickens’ London: fact, fictional representation and the nineteenth-century prison', Journal of Victorian Culture, 1, 203–36, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, M.‘Women, consumption and coverture in England, c. 1760–1960’, Historical Journal, 39, 703–22, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, M. ‘Scotch drapers and the politics of modernity: gender, class and nationality in the Victorian tally trade’. In M. Daunton and M. Hilton (eds.), The Politics of Consumption: Material Culture and Citizenship in Europe and America, London, 89–107, 2001.Google Scholar

Finn, M.‘Victorian law, literature and history: three ships passing in the night’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 7, 134–46, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, M.The Character of Credit: Personal Debt in English Culture, 1740–1914, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

Floud, R. and Johnson, P.The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, 3 vols., Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar

Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.The Economic History of Britain since 1700, 2 vols., Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar

Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, 2nd edn., 3 vols., Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar

Foreman-Peck, J. and Millward, R.Public and Private Ownership of British Industry, 1820–1990, Oxford, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Formoy, R. R.The Historical Foundation of Modern Company Law, London, 1923.Google Scholar

Fortescue, J. W.Dundonald, London, 1895.Google Scholar

Fox, A.A History of the National Union of Boot and Shoe Operatives, 1874–1957, Oxford, 1958.Google Scholar

Francis, J.Chronicles and Characters of the Stock Exchange, London, 1855.Google Scholar

Frederic, H.The Market-Place, London, 1899.Google Scholar

Freeman, M., Pearson, R. and Taylor, J. ‘Technological change and the governance of joint-stock enterprise in the early nineteenth century: the case of coastal shipping’, Business History, 49, 573–94, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freifeld, M. ‘Technological change and the “self-acting” mule: a study of skill and the sexual division of labour’, Social History, 11, 319–43, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frow, E. and Katanka, M.1868: Year of the Unions, London, 1968.Google Scholar

Gambles, A.Protection and Politics: Conservative Economic Discourse, 1815–1852, Woodbridge, 1999.Google Scholar

Garnett, E. J. ‘Aspects of the relationship between protestant ethics and economic activity in mid-Victorian England,’ Oxford University D.Phil thesis, 1986.

Getzler, J. and Macnair, M. ‘The firm as an entity before the Companies Acts’. In P. Brand, K. Costello and W. N. Osborough, Adventures of the Law, Dublin, 267–88, 2005.Google Scholar

Getzler, J. ‘The role of security over future and circulating capital: evidence from the British economy circa 1850–1920’. In J. Getzler and J. Payne (eds.), Company Charges: Spectrum and Beyond, Oxford, 227–51, 2006.Google Scholar

Gilmore, C. and Willmott, H. ‘Company law and financial reporting: a sociological history of the UK experience’. In M. Bromwich and A. Hopwood (eds.), Accounting and the Law, London, 159–190, 1992.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. ‘Critical legal histories’, Stanford Law Review 36, 57–125, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gore, C.The Banker's Wife, London, 1843.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossmith, G. and W. The Diary of a Nobody, Bristol, 1892.Google Scholar

Guinnane, T., Harris, R., Lamoreaux, N. and Rosenthal, J-L. ‘Putting the corporation in its place’, Enterprise and Society, 8, 687–729, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurney, W. B.The Trial of Charles Random de Berenger, Taken in Shorthand, London, 1814.Google Scholar

Habgood, W.Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: A Guide to Historical Records, Manchester, 1994.Google Scholar

Haig, J. C. ‘The case of Thanet, illustrating the methods of Mr H. H. Marks’. In Buxton, C. R., Electioneering Up-to-Date, London, 1906.Google Scholar

Haines, J.Maxwell, London, 1988.Google Scholar

Hall, N. J.Trollope: A Biography, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

Hannah, L.The Rise of the Corporate Economy, 2nd edn., London, 1983.Google Scholar

Hannah, L.‘Pioneering modern corporate governance: a view from London in 1900’, Enterprise and Society, 8, 642–86, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, H.The Ownership of Enterprise, Cambridge, MA, 1996.Google Scholar

Harling, P.The Waning of ‘Old Corruption’, Oxford, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, R.Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organisation 1720–1844, Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, R.‘The encounters of economic history and legal history’, Law and History Review, 21, 297–346, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, F.Imprisonment for Breach of Contract, or, the Master and Servant Act, Tracts for Trade unionists, no. 1, London, 1874.Google Scholar

Hart, O. D. ‘Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm’. In O. E. Williamson and S. G. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, 138–58, 1991.Google Scholar

Hay, D. ‘Property, authority and the criminal law’. In D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. P. Thompson and C. Winslow (eds.), Albion's Fatal Tree, Harmondsworth, 1977.Google Scholar

Hay, D. ‘Master and servant in England; using the law in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’. In W. Steinmetz (ed.), Private Law and Social Inequality in the Industrial Age, Oxford, 227–64, 2000.Google Scholar

Hedley, S. ‘The “needs of commercial litigants” in nineteenth and twentieth century contract law’, Legal History, 18, 85–90, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henty, G. A.With Cochrane the Dauntless, London, 1897.Google Scholar

Hess, H.‘The Critic’ Black Book, London, 1901–2.Google Scholar

Hilton, B.The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865, Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar

Hilton, M.Consumerism in Twentieth-Century Britain, Cambridge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirst, F. W.The Stock Exchange, London, 1911.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J.Labouring Men, London, 1964.Google Scholar

Holcombe, L.Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women's Property Law in Nineteenth-Century England, Toronto, 1983.Google Scholar

Hollander, S.The Economics of David Ricardo, London, 1979.Google Scholar

Honoré, A. ‘Ownership’. In A. G. Guest (ed.), Oxford Essays in JurisprudenceOxford, 107–47, 1961.Google Scholar

Hoppen, K. T.The Mid-Victorian Generation, 1846–1886, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar

Hoppit, J. ‘The use and abuse of credit in eighteenth-century England’. In R. B. Outhwaite and N. McKendrick (eds.), Business Life and Public Policy, Cambridge, 64–78, 1986.Google Scholar

Hoppit, J.Risk and Failure in English Business, 1700–1800, Cambridge, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, G.A Handy-Book of Labour Laws, London, 1867.Google Scholar

Huberman, M.Escape from the Market, Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar

Hudson, P.The Genesis of Industrial Capital: A Study of the West Riding Wool Textile Industry, c. 1750–1850, Cambridge, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphries, J. ‘“…The most free from objection…”: the sexual division of labour and women's work in nineteenth-century England’, Journal of Economic History, 47, 929–49, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, B. C.The Development of the Business Corporation in England, 1800–1867, Cambridge, MA, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, E. H.Regional Wage Variation in Britain, 1850–1914, Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. H.British Labour History, 1815–1914, London, 1981.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. H.‘Industrialization and regional inequality: wages in Britain, 1760–1914’, Journal of Economic History, 46, 935–66, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innes, J. ‘Prisons for the poor: English Bridewells 1555–1800’. In F. Snyder and D. Hay (eds.), Labour, Law and Crime: An Historical Perspective, London, 42–122, 1987.Google Scholar

Innes, J.Insurance Mail Yearbook, London, 1908.Google Scholar

Ireland, P. ‘The rise of the limited liability company’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 12, 239–60, 1984.Google Scholar

Ireland, P.‘Capitalism without the capitalist: the joint stock company share and the emergence of the modern doctrine of separate corporate personality’, Journal of Legal History, 17, 41–73, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itzkowitz, D. C. ‘Fair enterprise or extravagant speculation: investment, speculation and gambling in Victorian England’, Victorian Studies, 45, 121–47, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, R. V. ‘The structure of pay in nineteenth-century Britain’, Economic History Review, 40, 561–70, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaycee, Public Companies: From the Cradle to the Grave, London, 1883.Google Scholar

Jefferys, J. B. ‘Trends in Business Organisation in Great Britain since 1856’, PhD thesis, University of London, 1938.

Jefferys, J. B.‘The denomination and character of shares, 1855–1885’, Economic History Review, 16, 45–55, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, P.Saving and Spending: The Working-Class Economy in Britain 1870–1939, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar

Johnson, P.‘Class law in Victorian England’, Past and Present, 141, 147–69, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, P.‘Small debts and economic distress in England and Wales, 1857–1913’, Economic History Review, 46, 65–87, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, P. ‘Age, gender and the wage in Britain, 1830–1930’. In P. Scholliers and L. Schwartz (eds.), Experiencing Wages, Oxford, 229–49, 2003.Google Scholar

Johnson, P. ‘Market discipline’. In P. Mandler (ed.), Liberty and Authority in Victorian England, Oxford, 203–23, 2006.Google Scholar

Johnson, P. and Zaidi, A. ‘Work over the life course’. In N. F. R. Crafts, I. Gazeley and A. Newell (eds.), Work and Pay in Twentieth-Century Britain, Oxford, 98–116, 2007.Google Scholar

Jones, E.Accountancy and the British Economy 1840–1980: The Evolution of Ernst and Whinney, London, 1981.Google Scholar

Jones, S. and Aiken, M. ‘British companies legislation and social and political evolution during the nineteenth century’ British Accounting Review, 27, 61–82, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, E. ‘The lady clerks at the Prudential: the beginning of vertical segretation by sex in clerical work in nineteenth-century Britain’, Gender and History, 8, 65–81, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judd, D.Palmerston, London, 1975.Google Scholar

Katz, L. F. and Autor, D. H. ‘Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality’. In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A, Amsterdam, 1463–555, 1999.Google Scholar

Kay, J. ‘The Stakeholder Corporation’. In Kelly, G., Kelly, D. and Gamble, A. (eds.), Stakeholder Capitalism, Basingstoke, 125–141, 1997.

Kelman, M.A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar

Kent, D. A. ‘Small businessmen and their credit transactions in early nineteenth-century Britain’, Business History, 36, 47–64, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, N.Labour and Society in Britain and America, Aldershot, 1994.Google Scholar

Kostal, R. W.Law and English Railway Capitalism, 1825–1875, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar

Koten, D. C.The Post-Corporate World, West Hartford, CT, 1998.Google Scholar

Krippner, G. R. ‘The elusive market: embeddedness and the paradigm of economic sociology’, Theory and Society, 30, 775–810, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. ‘Legal determinants of external finance’, Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–50, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R.‘Law and finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1133–55, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamoreaux, N. R. ‘Constructing firms: partnerships and alternative contractual arrangements in early nineteenth century American business’, Business and Economic History, 24, 43–71, 1995.Google Scholar

Lavington, F.The English Capital Market, London, 1929.Google Scholar

Law, E. D.The Guilt of Lord Cochrane, London, 1914.Google Scholar

Law, H. S.Reviews of the ‘Autobiography of a Seaman’, London, 1877.Google Scholar

Lester, V. M.Victorian Insolvency, Oxford, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, W. B.Bribery, London, 1919.Google Scholar

Leventhal, F. M.Respectable Radical: George Howell and Victorian Working Class Politics, London, 1971.Google Scholar

Levi, L. ‘On the abolition of imprisonment for debt’, Law Magazine and Review, 3, 1847.Google Scholar

Levi, L.‘On joint stock companies’, Journal of the Statistical Society, 33, 1–41, 1870.Google Scholar

Levi, L.‘The progress of joint stock companies with limited and unlimited liability in the United Kingdom, during the fifteen years 1869–84’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 49, 241–72, 1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, D. ‘Contract before “freedom of contract”’. In H. N. Scheiber (ed.), The State and Freedom of Contract, Stanford, 1998.Google Scholar

Liebowitz, S. and Margolis, S. ‘The fable of the keys’, Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 1–25, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebowitz, S. and Margolis, S.‘Path dependence, lock-in, and history’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205–26, 1995.Google Scholar

Lindley, N.A Treatise on the Law of Companies Considered as a Branch of the Law of Partnership, London, 1891.Google Scholar

Lloyd, C.Lord Cochrane, London, 1947.Google Scholar

Lobban, M.The Common Law and English Jurisprudence, 1760–1850, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

Loftus, D. ‘Capital and community: limited liability and attempts to democratize the market in mid nineteenth-century England’, Victorian Studies, 45, 93–120, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longe, F. D.A Refutation of the Wages Fund Theory of Modern Political Economy, as Enunciated by Mr Mill and Mr Fawcett, London, 1866.Google Scholar

Lowe, R.Speech on the Amendment of the Law of Partnership and Joint Stock Companies, London, 1856.Google Scholar

Lown, J.Women and Industrialization: Gender at Work in Nineteenth-Century England, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar

MacDonagh, O. ‘The Nineteenth Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal’, Historical Journal, 1, 52–67, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, J. ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society, 29, 507–48, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maine, Sir H.Ancient Law, London, 1861.Google Scholar

Maitland, F. W.State, Trust and Corporation, D. Runciman and M. Ryan (eds.), Cambridge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manchester, A. H.A Modern Legal History of England and Wales, London, 1980.Google Scholar

Mann, J. de L.The Cloth Industry in the West of England from 1640 to 1880, Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar

Marcet, J.Conversation on Political Economy in which Elements of that Science are Familiarly Explained, London, 1816.Google Scholar

Marks, H.The Metropolitan Board of Works: A Brief Account of the Disclosures which Have Led to the Appointment of a Royal Commission, London, 1888.Google Scholar

Marshall, A.Principles of Economics, London, 1890.Google Scholar

Marshall, A.Industry and Trade: a Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization, London, 1919.Google Scholar

Martin, R. M.TUC: The Growth of a Pressure Group, 1868–1976, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar

Martineau, H. ‘The Manchester Strike’, Illustrations of Political Economy, London, 1832.Google Scholar

Matthew, H. C. G.Gladstone 1809–1874, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

McCulloch, J. R.Considerations on Partnership with Limited Liability, London, 1856.Google Scholar

McIvor, A. J.Organised Capital: Employers' Associations and Industrial Relations in Northern England, 1880–1939, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIvor, A. J.Men and Women of the Time, London, 1899.Google Scholar

Michie, R.The London Stock Exchange: A History, Oxford, 1999 and 2001.Google Scholar

Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A.The Company, London, 2003.Google Scholar

Mill, J.Elements of Political Economy, London, 1821.

Mill, J. S.Principles of Political Economy, London, 1848.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S.‘Thornton on Labour and its claims’, Fortnightly Review, May, 517–8, 1869.Google Scholar

Mincer, J.Schooling, Experience and Earnings, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

Mitchell, L.Corporate Irresponsibility: America's Newest Export, New Haven, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, E. V. and Thomas, W. A.The Stock Exchange: Its History and Functions, London, 1962.Google Scholar

Morris, R. J.Class, Sect and Party: The Making of the British Middle Class, Leeds 1820–1850, London, 1990.Google Scholar

Muldrew, C.The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England, Basingstoke, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullen, R.Anthony Trollope: A Victorian and His World, London, 1990.

Napier, C. and Noke, C. ‘Accounting and law; an historical overview of an uneasy relationship’. In M. Bromwich and A. Hopwood (eds.), Accounting and the Law, Hemel Hempstead, 30–54, 1992.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, 1982.Google Scholar

North, D. ‘Institutions and Economic Performance’. In Maki, U., Gustafsson, B. and Knudson, C. (eds.), Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London, 242–61, 1993.

O'Brian, P.The Reverse of the Medal, London, 1986.Google Scholar

O'Brien, D. P.The Classical Economists, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar

Oldham, J. ‘Special juries in England: nineteenth-century usage and reform’. Journal of Legal History, 8, 148–66, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orth, J. V.Combination and Conspiracy: A Legal History of Trade Unionism 1721–1906, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

Orth, J. V.Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar

Parris, H. ‘The nineteenth century revolution in government: a reappraisal reappraised’, Historical Journal, 3, 17–37, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, R. ‘Mutuality tested: the rise and fall of mutual fire insurance offices in eighteenth-century London’, Business History, 44, 1–28, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, R.‘Shareholder democracies? English stock companies and the politics of corporate governance during the Industrial Revolution’, English Historical Review, cxvii, 840–66, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phelps Brown, E. H. and Hopkins, S. V. ‘Seven centuries of building wages’, Economica, 22, 195–206, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phelps Brown, E. H. ‘The labour market’. In Wilson, T. and Skinner, A. S., The Market and the State, Oxford, 1976.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. ‘Black Country Magistracy 1835–60’, Midland History, 3, 161–90, 1975–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, G. and Whiteside, N.Casual Labour: The Unemployment Question in the Port Transport Industry 1880–1970, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar

Pierson, P. ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review, 94, 251–67, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P.‘Not just what, but when: timing and sequence in political processes’, Studies in American Political Development, 14, 72–92, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polden, P. ‘Judicial Selkirks: the county court judges and the press, 1847–80’. In Brooks, C. W. and Lobban, M. (eds.), Communities and Courts in Britain 1150–1900, London, 245–62, 1997.Google Scholar

Polden, P.A History of the County Court 1846–1971, Cambridge, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollock, F.Principles of Contract at Law and in Equity, London, 1876.Google Scholar

Poovey, M. ‘Writing about finance in Victorian England: disclosure and secrecy in the culture of investment’, Victorian Studies, 45, 17–41, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poovey, M.The Financial System in Nineteenth-Century Britain, Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar

Porter, D. ‘“A trusted guide of the investing public”: Harry Marks and the Financial News, 1884–1916’. In Davenport-Hines, R. P. T. (ed.), Speculators and Patriots: Essays in Business Biography, London, 1986.Google Scholar

Posner, R. A.Economic Analysis of Law, Boston, 1972.Google Scholar

Potter, A. ‘Attitude groups’, Political Quarterly, 29, 72–82, 1958.Google Scholar

Pottier, S. and Sommer, D. W. ‘Agency theory and life insurer ownership structure’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64, 529–43, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puffert, D. ‘The standardization of track gauge on North American railways, 1830–1890’, Journal of Economic History, 60, 933–60, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, A. ‘Work, culture and resistance to machinery in the West of England woollen industry’. In P. Hudson (ed.), Regions and Industries, Cambridge, 175–200, 1989.Google Scholar

Reddy, W. M.The Rise of Market Culture: the Textile Trade and French Society, 1750–1900, Cambridge, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redford, A.Manchester Merchants and Foreign Trade: 1794–1858, Manchester, 1934.Google Scholar

Reid, A. J. ‘Old unionism reconsidered: the radicalism of Robert Knight, 1870–1900’. In E. F. Biagini and A. J. Reid (eds.), Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organised Labour and Party Politics in Britain, 1850–1914, Cambridge, 214–43, 1991.Google Scholar

Ricardo, D.On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London, 1817.Google Scholar

Richardson, R. J.‘Exposure of the banking and funding system’, The English Chartist Circular: The Temperance Record for England and Wales 1.23 (1841), 90–1.Google Scholar

Ridley, J.The Young Disraeli, London, 1995.Google Scholar

Robb, G.White-Collar Crime in Modern England: Financial Fraud and Business Morality, 1845–1929, Cambridge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roe, M.Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton, 1994.Google Scholar

Rose, S.Limited Livelihoods: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-Century England, Berkeley, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, S. ‘The theory of equalizing differences’. In O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam, 641–92, 1987.Google Scholar

,Royal British Bank. Prospectus, Goldsmiths' Library, London, 1849.Google Scholar

Rubin, G. R. ‘The county courts and the tally trade, 1846–1914’. In G. Rubin and D. Sugarman (eds.), Law, Economy and Society, 1750–1914, Abingdon, 321–48, 1984.Google Scholar

Rubin, G. R. ‘Law, Poverty and Imprisonment for Debt, 1869–1914’. In G. R. Rubin and D. Sugarman (eds.), Law, Economy and Society, 1750–1914, Abingdon, 241–99, 1984.Google Scholar

Russell, N.The Novelist and Mammon, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Rutherford, M. ‘Predatory practices or reasonable values? American Institutionalists on the nature of market transactions’. In N. De Marchi and M. Morgan (eds.), Higgling: Transactors and their Markets in the History of Economics. Annual Supplement to vol. 26 of History of Political Economy (Durham, NC, 1994), 253–75, 1994.

Samuel, H. B.Shareholders' Money, London, 1933.Google Scholar

Saul, S. B.The Myth of the Great Depression, 1873–96, London, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saville, J. ‘Sleeping partnerships and limited liability, 1850–1856’, Economic History Review, 8, 418–33, 1956.Google Scholar

Scott, W. R.The Constitution and Finance of English, Scottish and Irish Joint-Stock Companies to 1720, Cambridge University Press, 1910–12.Google Scholar

Sealy, L. S.Company Law and Commercial Reality, London, 1984.Google Scholar

Searle, G. R.Morality and the Market in Victorian Britain, Oxford, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senior, N.An Outline of the Science of Political Economy, London, 1836.Google Scholar

Shannon, H. A. ‘The coming of general limited liability’, Economic History, 2, 267–91, 1931, reprinted in Carus-Wilson, E. M. (ed.), Essays in Economic History, London, 1954, 358–79.

Shannon, H. A.‘The first five thousand limited companies and their duration’, Economic History, 2, 396–424, 1932.Google Scholar

Shannon, H. A.‘The limited companies of 1866–83’, Economic History Review, 4, 290–316, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shannon, H. A.‘Review of H. B. Samuel, “Shareholders’ Money”', Economica, November, 507–9, 1933.Google Scholar

Shannon, R.The Age of Disraeli, 1868–1881: The Rise of Tory Democracy, London, 1992.Google Scholar

Sharpe, P. ‘Continuity and change: women's history and economic history in Britain’, Economic History Review, 48, 353–69, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, C. ‘The large manufacturing employers of 1907’, Business History, 25, 42–59, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheldrake, J.Municipal Socialism, Aldershot, 1989.Google Scholar

Simon, D. ‘Master and Servant’. In J. Saville (ed.), Democracy and the Labour Movement Essays in honour of Dona Torr, London, 160–200, 1954.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B.A History of the Common Law of Contract, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B.Leading Cases in the Common Law, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar

Smith, A.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner (eds.), Oxford, 1976 [1776].Google Scholar

Smith, H. ‘The resurgent County Court in Victorian Britain’, American Journal of Legal History, 13, 126–38, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snagge, Sir T.The Evolution of the County Court, London, 14, 1904.Google Scholar

Snyder, F. and Hay, D. (eds.), Labour, Law and Crime, London, 1987.Google Scholar

Southall, H. ‘The origins of the depressed areas: unemployment, growth, and regional economic structure in Britain before 1914’, Economic History Review, 41, 236–58, 1988.Google Scholar

Southall, H. and Gilbert, D. ‘A good time to wed?: marriage and economic distress in England and Wales, 1839–1914’, Economic History Review, 49, 35–57, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spain, J. ‘Trade unionists, Gladstonian Liberals and the labour law reforms of 1875’. In E. F. Biagiani and A. J. Reid (eds.), Currents of Radicalism, Cambridge, 109–33, 1991.Google Scholar

Spencer, H.The Man versus The State, Indianopolis, 1981 [1884].Google Scholar

Spensley, C.Twelve Hundred Facts about ‘Ordinary’ Life Assurance Offices, Bradford, 1901.Google Scholar

Statist, , All About Assurance, London, 1904.Google Scholar

Steinfeld, R.Coercion, Contract, and Free Labor in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinmetz, W. ‘Was there a de-juridification of individual employment relations in Britain?’ In W. Steinmetz (ed.), Private Law and Social Inequality in the Industrial Age, Oxford, 265–312, 2000.Google Scholar

Stenton, M.Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, vol. 1: 1832–1885, Hassocks, 1976.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, A. ‘Social structure and the founding of organizations’. In his Stratification and Organisation, Cambridge, 196–220, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Exchange, Stock, Report of the Sub-Committee of the Stock Exchange Relative to the Late Fraud, London, 1814.Google Scholar

Storrar, A. C. and Pratt, K. C. ‘Accountability vs privacy, 1844–1907: the coming of the private company’, Accounting, Business and Financial History 10, 259–91, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugarman, D. and Rubin, G. R. ‘Towards a new history of law and material society in England, 1750–1914’. In G. R. Rubin and D. Sugarman (eds.), Law, Economy and society, 1750–1914: Essays in the History of English Law, Abingdon, 1–123, 1984.Google Scholar

Sugarman, D. ‘A hatred of disorder: legal science, liberalism and imperialism’. In P. Fitzpatrick (ed.), Dangerous Supplements: Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence, London, 34–67, 1991.Google Scholar

Sugarman, D.‘Simple images and complex realities: English lawyers and their relationship to business and politics, 1750–1950’, Law and History Review, 11, 257–301, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugarman, D. ‘Who colonised whom? Historical reflections on the intersection between law, lawyers and accountants in England’. In Y. Dezalay and D. Sugarman (eds.), Professional Competition and Professional Power: Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of Markets, London, 226–37, 1995.Google Scholar

Supple, B.The Royal Exchange Assurance: A History of British Insurance 1720–1970, Cambridge, 1970.Google Scholar

Swiney, W.A Letter to the Rt. Hon. Benjamin D'Israeli Respecting Certain Life Assurance Companies, London, 1852.Google Scholar

Taussig, F. W.Wages and Capital: An Examination of the Wages Fund Doctrine, London, 1896.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. ‘Private property, public interest, and the role of the state in nineteenth-century Britain: the case of the lighthouses’, Historical Journal, 44, 749–71, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, J. ‘“Wealth makes worship”: attitudes to joint stock enterprise in British law, politics and culture, c. 1800–c. 1870’, University of Kent PhD thesis, 2002.

Taylor, J.Creating Capitalism: Joint-Stock Enterprise in British Politics and Culture, 1800–1870, Woodbridge, 2006.Google Scholar

Taylor, J.‘Company fraud in Victorian Britain: the Royal British Bank scandal of 1856’. English Historical Review, 122, 700–24, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terloc, T. L.Life Assurance: As It Is, and As It Should Be, Birmingham, 1887.Google Scholar

Thackeray, ‘The history of Samuel Titmarsh and the Great Hoggarty Diamond’, Fraser's Magazine, September–December, 1841.Google Scholar

Thackeray, The Joint-Stock Companies Directory, 1866, London, 1866.

Thomas, , 10th Earl of Dundonald, Autobiography of a Seaman, London, 1860.Google Scholar

Thomas, , 11th earl of Dundonald and Bourne, H. R. Fox, Life of Thomas, 10th Earl of Dundonald, Completing the Autobiography of a Seaman, 2 vols., London, 1869.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. ‘Time, work-discipline and industrial capitalism’, Past and Present, 38, 56–97, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, E. P.Whigs and Hunters, London, 1975.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. ‘The moral economy reviewed’. In his Customs in Common, London, 259–351, 1993.Google Scholar

Thompson, P. and Delano, A.Maxwell: A Portrait of Power, London, 1991.Google Scholar

Thornton, W.On Labour: Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Dues, Its Actual Present and Possible Future, London, 1869.Google Scholar

Todd, G. ‘Some aspects of joint stock companies, 1844–1900’, Economic History Review, 4, 46–71, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trainor, R. H.Black Country Elites: The Exercise of Authority in an Industrial Area, 1830–1900, Oxford, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trebilcock, C.Phoenix Assurance and the Development of British Insurance, vol. 1: 1782–1870, Cambridge, 1985.Google Scholar

Treble, J. H. ‘The record of the Standard Life Assurance Company in the life assurance market of the United Kingdom, 1850–64’. In O. M. Westall (ed.), The Historian and the Business of Insurance, Manchester, 1984.Google Scholar

Tressell, R.The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, London, 1965 [1914].Google Scholar

Trollope, A.The Way We Live Now, London, 1994 [1875].Google Scholar

Turkel, G. ‘Michel Foucault: Law, power, knowledge’, Journal of Law and Society, 17, 170–93, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valenze, D.The First Industrial Woman, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar

Helton, J. J. ‘Mining, share manias and speculation: British investment in overseas mining, 1880–1913’. In J. J. van Helton and Y. Cassis (eds.), Capitalism in a Mature Economy, Aldershot, 159–85, 1990.Google Scholar

Verdon, N.Rural Women Workers in Nineteenth-Century England: Gender, Work and Wages, Woodbridge, 2002.Google Scholar

Vint, J.Capital and Wages: A Lakatosian History of the Wages Fund Doctrine, Aldershot, 1994.Google Scholar

Walker, J. D. and Watson. Investors' and Shareholders' Guide, Edinburgh, 1894.Google Scholar

Walker, S. P. ‘Laissez-faire, collectivism and companies legislation in nineteenth century Britain’, British Accounting Review, 28, 305–24, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, S. and B. History of Trade Unionism, London, 1898.Google Scholar

Weintraub, S.Disraeli: A Biography, London, 1993.Google Scholar

Weiss, B.The Hell of the English, Lewisburg, 1986.Google Scholar

Wermel, M. T.The Evolution of Classical Wage Theory, New York, 1939.Google Scholar

Whately, R.Introductory Lectures on Political Economy, London, 1832.Google Scholar

Williamson, J. G. ‘The structure of pay in Britain, 1710–1911’, Research in Economic History, 7, 1982.Google Scholar

Williamson, J. G.Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality?, London, 1985.Google Scholar

Williamson, O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, London, 1987.Google Scholar

Wilson, A. J.Plain Advice About Life Insurance, London, 1898.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. F.British Business History, 1720–1994, Manchester, 1995.Google Scholar

Winch, D.Adam Smith's Politics, Cambridge, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wohl, A. S.Endangered Lives, London, 1983.Google Scholar

Woods, D. C. ‘The operation of the Master and Servant Acts in the Black Country, 1858–1875’, Midland History, 7, 93–115, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, D. ‘The determination of wage rates in the early modern north of England’, Economic History Review, 47, 22–43, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, T.Our New Masters, London, 1873.Google Scholar