Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:05:41.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Examination of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum: techniques and normal anatomy

from Section 1 - GI Tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2012

Marc S. Levine
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Parvati Ramchandani
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Stephen E. Rubesin
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Levine, MSRubesin, SEHerlinger, HDouble-contrast upper gastrointestinal examinations: technique and interpretationRadiology 1988 168 593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, DJ.Barium studies: single contrastGore, RMLevine, MSTextbook of gastrointestinal radiologyPhiladelphiaElsevier 2008 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, WJStewart, ETVlymen, WJ.Appropriate contrast media for evaluation of esophageal disruptionRadiology 1982 144 439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanomkiat, WGalassi, W.Barium sulfate as contrast medium for evaluation of postoperative anastomotic leaksActa Radiol 2000 41 482CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buecker, AWein, BBNeuerburg, JMEsophageal perforation: comparison of use of aqueous and barium-containing contrast mediaRadiology 1997 202 683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, JOLevine, MSRedfern, ROUsefulness of high-density barium for detection of leaks after esophagogastrectomy, total gastrectomy, and total laryngectomyAJR 2003 181 415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiu, CLGambach, RR.Hypaque pulmonary edema: a case reportRadiology 1974 111 91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubesin, SEHerlinger, H.The effect of barium suspension viscosity on the delineation of areae gastricaeAJR 1986 146 35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koehler, REWeyman, PJStanley, RJEvaluation of three effervescent agents for double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiographyGastrointest Radiol 1981 6 111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maglinte, DDTCaudill, LDKrol, KLThe minimum effective dose of glucagon in upper gastrointestinal radiographyGastrointest Radiol 1982 7 119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernish, SMMaglinte, DDT.Glucagon: common untoward reactions – review and recommendationsRadiology 1990 177 145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggar, AMFeczko, PJHalpert, RDSpontaneous gastroesophageal reflux during double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiography with glucagonGastrointest Radiol 1982 7 319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, MSLaufer, I.The gastrointestinal tract: dos and don'ts of digital imagingRadiology 1998 207 311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahasi, MUeno, SYoshimatsu, S.Gastrointestinal examinations with digital radiographyRadioGraphics 1992 12 969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkhof, FDavid, Ede Geest, F.Comparison of film-screen combination and digital fluorography in gastrointestinal barium examinations in a clinical settingEur J Radiol 1996 22 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, MSRubesin, SELaufer, I.Barium esophagography: a study for all seasonsClin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 6 11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, DJChen, YMHewson, EGEsophageal motility: assessment with synchronous video tape fluoroscopy and manometryRadiology 1989 173 419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JKKoehler, RERichter, JE.Detection of gastroesophageal reflux: value of barium studies compared with 24-hr pH monitoringAJR 1994 162 621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kikuchi, YLevine, MSLaufer, IValue of flow technique for double-contrast examination of the stomachAJR 1986 174 1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maglinte, DDLappas, JCChernish, SMFlow artifacts in double-contrast esophagographyRadiology 1985 157 535CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gohel, VKKressel, HYLaufer, I.Double contrast artifactsGastrointest Radiol 1978 3 139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, MS.Miscellaneous abnormalities of the esophagusGore, RMLevine, MSTextbook of gastrointestinal radiologyPhiladelphiaElsevier 2008 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, YMOtt, DJGelfand, DWMultiphasic examination of the esophagogastric region for strictures, rings, and hiatal hernia: evaluation of the individual techniquesGastrointest Radiol 1985 10 311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gohel, VKEdell, SLLaufer, ITransverse folds in the human esophagusRadiology 1978 128 303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samadi, FLevine, MSRubesin, SEFeline esophagus and gastroesophageal refluxAJR 2010 194 972CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, MSLow, VLaufer, IFocal spiculation of the upper thoracic esophagus: a normal variant on double-contrast esophagographyRadiology 1992 183 807CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, SNTeplick, SKGoldstein, JGlycogenic acanthosis of the esophagusAJR 1982 139 683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sam, JWLevine, MSMiller, WT.The right inferior supraazygous recess: a cause of upper esophageal pseudomass on double-contrast esophagographyAJR 1998 171 1583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, KCGold, BMPrintz, DA.Multiple transverse folds in the gastric antrumRadiology 1987 164 339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charagundla, SRLevine, MSLanglotz, CPVisualization of areae gastricae on double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiography: relationship to age of patientsAJR 2001 177 61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohn, JLevine, MSFurth, EE gastritis: radiographic findingsRadiology 1995 195 763CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torigian, DALevine, MSGill, NSLymphoid hyperplasia of the stomach: radiographic findings in five adult patientsAJR 2001 177 71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herlinger, HGrossman, RLaufer, IThe gastric cardia in double-contrast study: its dynamic imageAJR 1980 135 21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agha, FPGhahremani, GGTsang, TKHeterotopic gastric mucosa in the duodenum: radiographic findingsAJR 1988 150 291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burrell, MToffler, R.Flexural pseudolesions of the duodenumRadiology 1976 120 313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodfield, CALevine, MS.The postoperative stomachEur J Radiol 2005 53 341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×