Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:06:27.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Fragment-based structure-guided drug discovery: strategy, process, and lessons from human protein kinases

from PART I - STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Kenneth M. Merz, Jr
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Dagmar Ringe
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, Massachusetts
Charles H. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The experimental roots of fragment-based drug discovery can be found in the work of Petsko, Ringe, and coworkers, who were the first to report flooding of protein crystals with small organic solutes (e.g., compounds such as benzene with ten or fewer nonhydrogen atoms) to identify bound functional groups that might ultimately be transformed into targeted ligands. The concept of linking fragments together to increase binding affinity was described as early as 1992 by Verlinde et al. Computational screening of fragments, using tools such as DOCK or MCSS, was also described in the early 1990s. Pharmaceutical industry application of fragment screening began at Abbott Laboratories, where Fesik and coworkers pioneered “SAR by NMR” (structure/activity relationship by nuclear magnetic resonance). In this spectroscopic approach, bound fragments are detected by NMR screening and subsequently linked together to increase affinity, as envisaged by Verlinde and coworkers. Application of x-ray crystallography to detect and identify fragment hits was also pursued at Abbott.

Fragment-based drug discovery has now been under way for more than a decade. Although Fesik and coworkers popularized the notion of linking fragments (as in their highly successful BCL-2 program), tactical emphasis appears to have largely shifted from fragment condensation to fragment engineering (or growing the fragment) to increase binding affinity and selectivity. Various biotechnology companies, including SGX Pharmaceuticals, Astex, and Plexxikon, have recently demonstrated that fragment-based approaches can indeed produce development candidates suitable for Phase I studies of safety and tolerability in patients (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Type
Chapter
Information
Drug Design
Structure- and Ligand-Based Approaches
, pp. 30 - 40
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, K. N.; Bellamacina, C. R.; Ding, X.; Jeffery, C. J.; Mattos, C.;Petsko, G. A.; Ringe, D.An experimental approach to mapping the binding surfaces of crystalline protein. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 2605–2611.Google Scholar
Verlinde, C. I. M. J.; Rudenko, G.; Hoi, W. G. J.In search of new lead compounds for trypanosomiasis drug design: a protein structure-based linked-fragment approach. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6, 131–147.Google Scholar
Kuntz, I. D.Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science 1992, 257, 1078–1082.Google Scholar
Kuntz, I. D.; Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.Structure-based molecular design. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 117–123.Google Scholar
Caflisch, A.; Miranker, A.; Karplus, M.Multiple copy simultaneous search and construction of ligands in binding sites: application to inhibitors of HIV-I aspartic proteinase. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2142–2167.Google Scholar
Shuker, S. B.; Hajduk, P. J.; Meadows, R. P.; Fesik, S. W.Discovering high affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science 1996, 274, 1531–1534.Google Scholar
Nienaber, V. I.; Richardson, P. I.; Klighofer, V.; Bouska, J. J.; Giranda, V. I.; Greer, J.Discovering novel ligands for macromolecules using x-ray crystallographic screening. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 1105–1108.Google Scholar
Bohacek, R. S.; McMartin, C.; Guida, W. C.The art and practice of structure-based drug design: a molecular modelling perspective. Med. Res. Rev. 1996, 16, 3–50.Google Scholar
Hann, M. M.; Leach, A. R.; Harper, G., G. Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 856–864.Google Scholar
Hann, M. M.; Oprea, T. I.Pursuing the lead likeness concept in pharmaceutical research. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 255–263.Google Scholar
Oprea, T. I.; Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J.; Leeson, P. D.Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308–1315.Google Scholar
Teague, S. J.; Davis, A. M.; Leeson, P. D.; Oprea, T.The design of leadlike combinatorial libraries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3743–3748.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congreve, M.; Chessari, G.; Tisi, D.; Woodhead, A. J.Recent developments in fragment based drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, in press.Google Scholar
Gill, A. I.; Frederickson, M.; Cleasby, A.; Woodhead, S. J.; Carr, M. G.; Woodhead, A J.; Walker, M. T.; Congreve, M. S.; et al. Identification of novel p38ct MAP kinase inhibitors using fragment-based lead generation. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 414–426.Google Scholar
Lesuisse, D.; Lange, G.; Deprez, P.; Benard, D.; Schoot, B.; Delettre, G.; Marquette, J.-P.; Broto, P.; et al. SAR and X-ray: a new approach combining fragment-based screening and rational drug design: application to the discovery of nanomolar inhibitors of Src SH2. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2379–2387.Google Scholar
Card, G. I.; Blasdel, I.; England, B. P.; Zhang, C.; Suzuki, Y.; Gillette, S.; Fong, D.; Ibrahim, P. N.; et al. A family of phosphodiesterase inhibitors discovered by cocrystallography and scaffold-based drug design. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 201–207.Google Scholar
Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J.Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Drug Deliv. Res. 1997, 23, 3–25.Google Scholar
Congreve, M.; Carr, R.; Murray, C.; Jhoti, H.A “rule of three” for fragment-based lead discovery?Drug Discov. Today 2003, 8, 876–877.Google Scholar
Wenlock, M. C.; Austin, R. P.; Barton, P.; Davis, A M.; Leeson, P. D.A comparison of physiochemical property profiles of development and marketed oral drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1250–1256.Google Scholar
Vieth, M.; Siegel, M. G.; Higgs, R. E.; Watson, I. A.; Robertson, D. H.; Savin, K. A.; Durst, G. I.; Hipskind, P.A. Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 224–232.Google Scholar
Paolini, G. V.; Shapland, R. H. B.; Hoorn, W. P.; Mason, J. S.; Hopkins, A. L.Global mapping of pharmacological space. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 805–815.Google Scholar
Blaney, J.; Nienaber, V.; Burley, S. K. In: Fragment-Based Approaches in Drug Discovery, Jahnke, W.; and Erlanson, D. A.; Eds. Weinheim: Wiley VCH; 2006, 215–248.
Fink, T.; Bruggesser, H.; Reymond, J.-L.Virtual exploration of the small molecule chemical universe below 160 daltons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1504–1508.Google Scholar
Xie, X.; Kokubo, T.; Cohen, S. I.; Mirza, U. A.; Hoffman, A.; Chait, B. T.; Roeder, R. G.; Nakatani, Y.; et al. Structural similarity between TAFs and the heterotetrameric core of the histone octamer. Nature 1996, 380, 287–288.Google Scholar
,Collaborative Computational Project. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Cryst. 1994 D50, 760–763.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×