Is it not a total misunderstanding of Shakespeare's character and the canons of his art to suppose that he ‘rails’? If in Shallow he permits himself to gibbet Lucy, it is the only example of personal satire—I might add, of personal reminiscence—that can be reasonably detected in his plays. To Shakespeare in his lifetime John Davies of Hereford addressed some lines which most truly illustrate that nobility in his nature which stooped to no considerations of spite or revenge, such as were exhibited by other playwrights—e.g. Jonson, Dekker and Marston.

‘Honesty’: in other words ‘the fine strains of honour.’ Others may copy from him the tone of chivalry, of kings and courts, but Shakespeare is the king of courtesy. In him is instinct the ‘reigning wit,’ the ‘wisdom’ and ‘royalty of nature’ that were in Banquo.

In the matter of satire Shakespeare leaves us in no doubt as to the principles of his dramatic art. Theseus, splendidly impersonal and poetic, has the instinctive distaste of his creator for the drama which veils ‘some satire, keen and critical.’ There is only one poet whose character and quality are sketched for us in the Plays—the Poet of Timon of Athens.