Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:29:04.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Farm policy reform in the United States: past progress and future direction

from PART I - The recent evolution of agricultural trade policy reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz
Affiliation:
ICTSD, Geneva, Switzerland
Christophe Bellmann
Affiliation:
ICTSD, Geneva, Switzerland
Jonathan Hepburn
Affiliation:
ICTSD, Geneva, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Toward the end of its first decade, a chaotic environment shaped US farm policies for the twenty-first century. Exchange rates had realigned significantly over the past decade, yet they remained skewed globally compared to levels that might be necessary for sustainable balanced trade. There had been five years of disastrous expansion of armed conflict in the Middle East, with collateral effects on world oil prices. No one could confidently disentangle proximate short-term from longer-term supply and demand determinants to say for certain where oil prices might settle. The occurrence of global warming was broadly recognized even within resistant circles in the US, but what was to be done about it? The call for greater energy self-sufficiency (called “security”, of course) was flying high politically, but was it a viable economic strategy? Questions arose in these circumstances about the traditional assumptions in agricultural policy deliberations that farm prices will often be low and that developed-country subsidies will drive them down further.

In this chaotic environment, the US Congress wrote a new farm bill in 2008. The prospect of whether or not there would be a multilateral Doha Round WTO agreement simmered in the background, but the domestic farm bill debate paid little attention to multilateral rules or constraints. Bioenergy enthusiasm (and subsidies) fuelled market optimism. Crop prices were relatively high after 2005, as they were briefly in 1995 to 1996, then shot up in 2008, with projections for continuation of high prices through the decade.

Type
Chapter
Information
Agricultural Subsidies in the WTO Green Box
Ensuring Coherence with Sustainable Development Goals
, pp. 86 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,American Farm Bureau Federation, MAAPP Study Group (2005), Making American Agriculture Productive and Profitable, Washington DC: American Farm Bureau Federation.Google Scholar
Babcock, Bruce (2008), “Statement before the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs”, presented at the Hearing on Fuel Subsidies and Impact on Food Prices, May 7.Google Scholar
Blandford, David and Timothy, Josling (2007), “Should the Green Box be Modified?” Washington DC: International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Discussion Paper, March.Google Scholar
Blandford, David and David, Orden (2008), “United States: Shadow WTO Agricultural Domestic Support Notifications”, revised paper prepared for the conference Improving WTO Transparency, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Brasher, Philip (2008), “Farm bill's potential cost ‘off the charts’”, Des Moines Register, May 16.Google Scholar
Brink, Lars (2006), “WTO Constraints on US and EU Domestic Support in Agriculture: The October 2005 Proposals”, Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 7:1, 96–115.Google Scholar
Bureau, Jean-Christophe, Alex, Gohin, Loïc, Guindé et al. (2007), “EU Sugar Reforms and Their Impacts”, presented at the conference Global Sugar Markets, Policies and Reform Options, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC, June 1, http://www.ifpri.org/events/conferences/2007/20070601sugar.asp.Google Scholar
,Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Agriculture Task Force (Catherine Bertini, August Schumacher Jr. and Robert L. Thompson, co-chairs) (2006), Modernizing America's Food and Farm Policy: Vision for a New Direction, Chicago, IL: Chicago Council on Global Affairs.Google Scholar
,Committee on Agriculture, US House of Representatives (2008), Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (H.R. 2419), http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/2007FarmBill.html.Google Scholar
Gorter, Harry, and Just, David R. (2007), “The Law of Unintended Consequences: How the US Biofuel Tax Credit with a Mandate Subsidizes Oil Consumption and Has No Impact on Ethanol Consumption”, Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper No. 2007–20, Cornell University, October 23 (updated February 2008), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024525.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kimberly Ann (2006), Delivering on Doha: Farm Trade and the Poor, Washington DC: Center for Global Development and Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
,Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (2008), “Biofuels: Impact of Selected Farm Bill Provisions and other Biofuel Policy Options”, FAPRI-MU Report No. 06–08, June.Google Scholar
,IPC (International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council) (2006), “WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace”, Discussion Paper prepared by Robert Howse, Petrus van Bork and Charlotte Hebebrand, October.Google Scholar
James, Sallie and Daniel, Griswold (2007), “Freeing the Farm: A Farm Bill for All Americans”, Washington DC: CATO Institute.Google Scholar
Johnson, Renee (coordinator) (2008), “Farm Bill Legislative Action in the 110th Congress”, RL33934, Congressional Research Service, June 19.Google Scholar
Lugar, Senator Richard G. (2006), “Keynote Address at Summit on Energy Security”, Purdue University, August 29.Google Scholar
Orden, David (2007), “Feasibility of Farm Program Buyouts”, Paper presented at a seminar of the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, February, http://farmpolicy.typepad.com/farmpolicy/files/orden_buyouts.pdf.Google Scholar
Orden, David, David, Blandford and Tim, Josling (2008), “Determinants of Farm Policies in the United States, 1996–2008”, presented at the conference The Political Economy of Distortions to Agricultural Incentives, World Bank, Washington DC: May 23–4.Google Scholar
Orden, David, Paarlberg, Robert and Terry, Roe (1999), Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schnepf, Randy and Womach, Jasper (2006), “Potential Challenges to U.S. Farm Subsidies in the WTO: A Brief Overview”, Congressional Research Service, October 25.Google Scholar
Stokes, Bruce (2007a), “Ending Farm Subsidies”, National Journal, February 24.Google Scholar
Stokes, Bruce (2007b) “CITI and Farm”, Congressional Daily AM, April 28.Google Scholar
Sumner, Daniel (2005), “Boxed In: Conflicts Between US Farm Policies and WTO Obligations”, CATO Institute, Trade Policy Analysis No. 32, December.Google Scholar
Tyner, Wallace (2007), “U.S. Ethanol Policy – Possibilities for the Future”, Bioenergy, Purdue Extension ID-342-W, January.Google Scholar
,US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2008b), “Charts showing budget exposure from the ACRE revenue support”, Office of the Chief Economist, Washington, DC: May.Google Scholar
,United States Department of Agriculture (2007), America's Farm Bill: 2007 Farm Bill Proposals, January.Google Scholar
Womach, Jasper (2003), “Comparing Quota Buyout Payments for Peanuts and Tobacco”, Congressional Research Service Report RS 1642, October.Google Scholar
,World Trade Organisation (2005), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, World Trade Organization, Geneva, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, &WT/DS267/AB/R, March 21.Google Scholar
Zulaf, Carl (2007), “Analysis of Alternative Farm Bill Support Programs for Corn, Soybeans and Wheat”, AEDE-RP0095–07, Ohio State University, December.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×