Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T17:01:36.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Validity and threats to the validity of vocabulary measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Helmut Daller
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
James Milton
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea
Jeanine Treffers-Daller
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the first chapter of this volume, Paul Nation draws our attention to six factors that are potential threats to the validity of language assessment. By way of introduction to this chapter we will briefly consider three of these before concentrating on issues connected with ‘multiple measures’ and ‘the unit of counting’ in more detail. We will omit ‘testing vocabulary in use’, but not because we do not think it is important. More naturalistic approaches to language testing including aspects of normal language use are advocated in many areas of applied linguistics (see Porter, 1997, on second language oral testing; Wells, 1985, on early first language assessment; Holmes and Singh, 1996, on vocabulary in aphasia; Bucks, Singh, Cuerdon and Wilcock, 2000, on analysing lexical performance in dementia patients). Issues that touch on this will be addressed under ‘multiple measures’.

All three remaining factors discussed by Nation – frequency lists, learner attitude, and first and second language formats – strike a chord with our own concerns related to research, language teaching, and the education of teachers. In the past, we have been sceptical about the use of word-frequency lists in second language assessment (Malvern, Richards, Chipere and Duràn, 2004). At lower and even intermediate levels, exposure to vocabulary can be too limited and too heavily biased towards the lexical idiosyncrasies of teachers and textbooks for native speaker norms to be a reliable metric. Recently, however, we have been forced to think again.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×