Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T19:29:06.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Italy: A Christian Democratic or Clientelist Welfare State?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2010

Kees van Kersbergen
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Philip Manow
Affiliation:
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Is the welfare state in Italy, a quintessentially Christian Democratic polity, a ‘Christian Democratic welfare state (CDWS)?’ The Italian welfare state has most, if not all, of the hallmarks of what is often referred to in the comparative welfare state literature as a CDWS: contributory social insurance programs linked to occupation that reproduce status differentials, a predominance of transfers over services, low female force participation, and low employment rates among others. The key explanation in the comparative literature for the emergence of these features in a number of countries has been Christian Democratic party strength, usually measured as ‘government participation of Christian Democratic parties’ (Huber et al. 1993; Huber and Stephens 2001). In Italy, both the institutional features and the political strength of Democrazia Cristiana ([DC], i.e., the Christian Democratic party) are undeniably present, lending plausibility to the argument that Christian Democracy built the Italian welfare state.

Yet, this view of the Italian welfare state as organically related to the political strength of a Christian Democratic party does not, I argue, concern itself adequately with the mechanisms by which Christian Democracy as a political phenomenon becomes translated into welfare state structures. Indeed, it tells us little about how Christian Democratic parties may have created homologous welfare states, as distinct from the welfare states constructed in polities dominated by social democratic or liberal parties.

A second strain of thought in the comparative literature has done more to uncover the causal mechanisms at work (Becker and van Kersbergen 1988; Esping-Andersen 1990, 1998; van Kersbergen 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×