Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T07:02:38.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Equality, Tolerance, and Cultural Oppression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2010

Andrew Kernohan
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia
Get access

Summary

Liberalism is the dominant political ideology in North America and Western Europe. Liberalism is not a unified doctrine; its proponents range from Scandinavian social democrats to American libertarian capitalists. All varieties of liberalism, however, share a commitment both to the equal moral worth of persons and to the tolerance of diverse points of view on how lives should be lived. Liberalism originated in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century struggles against the aristocratic state and its established church. So one of its original tasks was to defend equality by arguing for the equal moral worth of the members of all social groups, both aristocrats and commoners. Its other important task was to defend tolerance by giving a theoretical account of how diverse religious views, both established and nonconformist, could coexist in one state. By failing to contest cultural oppression, I shall argue, contemporary liberalism has overemphasized tolerance at the expense of equality.

LIBERALISM, EQUALITY, AND TOLERANCE

Tolerance has remained a major feature of twentieth-century liberalism in both its libertarian and egalitarian variants. Tolerance for competing versions of the good life distinguishes libertarians from Christian fundamentalists, however much they may agree on government economic policy. And a commitment to tolerance distinguishes liberal egalitarians from the socialist egalitarians of the old USSR. Recent liberal writing incorporates tolerance through the principle of state neutrality. Dworkin defines neutrality like this:

Liberalism commands tolerance; it commands, for example, that political decisions about what citizens should be forced to do or prevented from doing must be made on grounds that are neutral among the competing convictions about good and bad lives that different members of the community might hold.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×