Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:42:08.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Case usage among the Pennsylvania German sectarians and nonsectarians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Get access

Summary

For immigrant and minority languages in the United States, language death is an almost inevitable outcome of contact with American English. The promise of social and economic advancement proffered by mastery of English eventually overcomes the most fervent of language loyalty intentions. The number of social contexts in which speakers can use the minority language. steadily declines. Without the support of continued immigration from the language homeland, the number of fluent interlocutors gradually decreases, and eventually no social context remains in which it is appropriate to speak the minority language. Pennsylvania German, although it has enjoyed a long history in America, is no exception to this general process.

Pennsylvania Germans settled in America during colonial times in farm communities across southeastern and central Pennsylvania. Secondary settlements arose later in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and the Virginias. While many of these communities have long ago completely and irrevocably assimilated into mainstream American society, some have maintained their peculiarly Pennsylvania German (PG) culture and language to the present time. Although all Pennsylvania Germans share many traits and values, the PG population is not one homogeneous group. It consists of many subgroups, each having a different relationship to the dominant society, and each speaking a variety of Pennsylvania German which fulfills different communicative and symbolic functions. The purpose of this study is to document linguistic change in such subgroups: Pennsylvania German, as it is dying in farm communities of nonsectarians, and as it is being maintained in farm communities of Amish and Mennonite sectarians.

Background

Within a community shifting from one language to another, proficiency in the receding language varies widely.

Type
Chapter
Information
Investigating Obsolescence
Studies in Language Contraction and Death
, pp. 211 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×