Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:33:41.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - ‘Trans’ trouble: trans-sexuality and the end of gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Terrell Carver
Edited by
Jude Browne
Terrell Carver
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Theory, University of Bristol
Jude Browne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Current developments in trans-sexual technologies, and trans-gender identities, may seem marginal to the traditional concerns of ethics, and to mainstream moral issues. They are not. Ethics is concerned with the human person in relation to the good, as a matter of judgement and action (see, for example, Aristotle 2000, esp. Book I). Ethical discourses, as they are repetitively (yet variably) articulated in society, produce the human individual conceptually and socially as a physical and ethical subject. This is done through the construction of stereotypes (which are of course never fully realised by any one individual) and the elision of ‘difficult’ or ‘intermediate’ types (through marginalisation, erasure or ‘forgetting’). Any ethical subject also has a ‘constitutive outside’, a set of overt and contrasting categories and stereotypes through which ‘others’ are understood as different from the ethical subject itself (but without which the ethical subject is not fully intelligible). These may be human others, distinguished by age, sex, race/ethnicity, religion, language, class or any other set of markers, to which an ethical authority or discourse may appeal (see, for example, Aristotle 1996, esp. Books I–III). Or indeed these others may be animals, divinities or spirits (which resemble animals or humans in various ways), or mythological or cult entities of ambiguous status.

Ethical communication is not always dialogical in the sense of communication amongst moral persons who construe themselves as equals.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Gender , pp. 116 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, (1996) The Politics and The Constitution of Athens, ed. and trans. S. Everson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2000) Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and trans. R. Crisp (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindel, J. (2004) ‘If We Wanted To Be Straight, We Would Be’. www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1372971,00.html
Blasius, M. (1994) Gay and Lesbian Politics: Sexuality and the Emergence of a New Ethic (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2000) Antigone's Claim: Kinship between Life and Death (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004) Undoing Gender (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Carver, T. (1996) ‘ “Public Man” and the Critique of Masculinities’, Political Theory 24: 673–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, T. (1998) ‘A Political Theory of Gender: Perspectives on the “Universal subject” ’, in Randall, R. and Waylen, G. (eds.), Gender, Politics and the State (London: Routledge), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, T. (2004) Men in Political Theory (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Currah, P. (2001) ‘Queer Theory, Lesbian and Gay Rights, and Transsexual Marriages’. in Blasius, Mark (ed.), Sexual Identities, Queer Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 178–99.Google Scholar
Dean, C. and Goodstein, L. (2005) ‘Leading Cardinal Redefines Church's View on Evolution’ www.nytimes.com/2005/07/09/science/09cardinal.html (12 July 05).
Dreger, A. D. (2004) One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Evans, D. T. (1993) Sexual Citizenship: The Material Construction of Sexualities (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985) Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000) Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990–2) The History of Sexuality, 3 vols, trans. R. Hurley (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Gavanas, A. (2002) ‘The Fatherhood Responsibility Movement: The Centrality of Marriage, Work and Male Sexuality in Reconstructions of Masculinity and Fatherhood’, in Hobson, B. (ed.), Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (New York: Cambridge University Press), 213–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, J. (1993) Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Great Britain (2000) Report of the Interdepartmental Working Group on Transsexual People (London: Home Office).
Harris, J. (2004) On Cloning (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Harris, J. and Holm, S. (eds.) (2000) The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice and Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press).Google Scholar
Josephson, J. (2005) ‘Citizenship, Same-Sex Marriage and Feminist Critiques of Marriage’, Perspectives on Politics 3: 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, G. (2001) Monsieur d'Eon Is a Woman: A Tale of Political Intrigue and Sexual Masquerade, new edn (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Katz, J. N. (1995) The Invention of Heterosexuality (New York: Dutton).Google Scholar
Kinsella, H. (2005) ‘Securing the Civilian: Sex and Gender in the Laws of War’, in Barnett, M. and Duvall, B. (eds.), Power and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 249–72.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2003) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1988) Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lorber, J. (1994) Paradoxes of Gender (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
McCall Smith, A. (2000) ‘The Separating of Conjoined Twins’. bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/321/7264/782 (11 July 2005).
Minow, M. and Shanley, M. L. (1996) ‘Relations, Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law’, Hypatia 11: 4–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (1988) The Sexual Contract (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1999) ‘Beyond the Sexual Contract?’, in Dench, G. (ed.), Rewriting the Sexual Contract (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction), 1–9.Google Scholar
Phelan, S. (1994) Getting Specific: Postmodern Lesbian Politics (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press).Google Scholar
Phelan, S. (2001) Sexual Strangers: Gays, Lesbians, and Dilemmas of Citizenship (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. (2002) Rational Woman: A Feminist Critique of Dichotomy, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Reinisch, J. (1991) The Kinsey Institute New Report on Sex: What You Must Know To Be Sexually Literate (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Scharnberg, K. (2003) www.come-over.to/FAS/ProsecutePregnant.htm (11 July 2005).
Shanley, M. L. (1982) ‘Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth Century English Political Thought’, in Elshtain, J. B. (ed.), The Family in Political Thought (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press), 80–95.Google Scholar
Shanley, M. L. (1989) Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victoran England 1850–1895 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Shanley, M. L., Cohen, J. and Chasman, D. (2004) Just Marriage (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Squires, J. (1999) Gender in Political Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (1999) Reproducing the State (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Tremlett, G. (2004) http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1143435,00.html (11 July 2005).
Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
UK Parliament (2004) Gender Recognition Act. www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/40007-a.htm#2 (11 July 2005).
Vogel, U. (1994) ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’, in Steenbergen, B. (ed.), The Condition of Citzenship (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), 76–89.Google Scholar
Vogel, U. (1995) ‘ “But in a Republic, men are needed”: Guarding the Boundaries of Liberty’, in Wokler, R. (ed.), Rousseau and Liberty (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 213–30.Google Scholar
Warner, M. (ed.) (1993) Fear of a Queer Planet. (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press).Google Scholar
Warner, M. (1999) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
Warren, M. A. (2000) Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, J., Heaphy, B. and Donovan, C. (2001) Same-Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, K. (1991) Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Whittle, S. (1996) ‘Gender Fucking or Fucking Gender?’ in Ekins, R. and King, D. (eds.), Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross-Dressing and Sex Changing (Routledge: London), 196–214.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1990) Throwing Like a Girl and other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×