Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:50:50.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Perspectives on gender equality: challenging the terms of debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Valerie Bryson
Affiliation:
Professor of Politics, University of Huddersfield
Jude Browne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Today in the west, it is not only self-proclaimed feminists who say that women should have the same right as men to vote, enter politics, go to university, work outside the home or receive equal pay when they do equal work. This kind of equality is now part of the ‘common sense’ of our society. These equal rights were, however, not won easily, and they have still not been won in many parts of the world.

Early feminist campaigns for equal rights used a range of arguments, many of which can still be heard today. Some feminists accepted and adapted traditional ideas about women's ‘difference’ from men to argue that women needed political rights and legal protection in order that their needs as wives and mothers could be met, and/or so that their alleged qualities, such as peace-making and temperance, could raise the quality of public life. Some saw sex equality as a consequence and/or precondition for a more generally equal socialist society, in which human relationships would be free from ownership and control. Many others used the language of liberal democracy to demand rights on the grounds that women were in relevant respects the same as men, and that as rational individuals they should have the same rights and opportunities (for overviews of early feminism, see Evans 1977; Banks 1986; Bryson 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, O. (1986) Faces of Feminism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Bellamy, K. and Rake, K. (2005) Money, Money, Money. Is It Still a Rich Man's World? An Audit of Women's Economic Welfare in Britain Today (London: Fawcett Society).Google Scholar
Blumberg, R. (1991) Gender, Family and Economy: The Triple Overlap (London: Sage).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, V. (1999) ‘ “Patriarchy”: A Concept Too Useful to Lose’, Contemporary Politics 5, 4: 311–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, V. (2003) Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Macmillan Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, V. (2004) ‘Marxism and Feminism: Can the “Unhappy Marriage” Be Saved?Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 1: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, V. (2005) ‘Production and (Re)production’, in Blakeley, G. and Bryson, V. (eds.), Marx and Other Four-Letter Words (London: Pluto), 127–42.Google Scholar
Budig, M. and Folbre, N. (2004) ‘Activity, Proximity or Responsibility? Measuring Parental Childcare Time’, in Folbre, N. and Bittman, M. (eds.), Family Time: The Social Organisation of Care (London and New York: Routledge), 51–68.Google Scholar
Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Cousins, C. and Tang, N. (2003) Working Time: Flexibility and Family Life in the UK, the Netherlands and Sweden (University of Hertfordshire Business School, Employment Studies Paper 45).
Daly, M. and Rake, K. (2003) Gender and the Welfare State (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
Dinnerstein, D. (1987) The Rocking of the Cradle and the Ruling of the World (London: Women's Press).Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A. (eds.) (2003) Global Women: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York: Metropolitan Books).Google Scholar
Equal Opportunities Commission (2003) Press Release ‘Minimum Wage for Modern Apprentices Would Help Close Gender Pay Gap’ (Manchester: EOC).
Equal Opportunities Commission (2005) Sex and Power: Who Runs Britain? (Manchester: EOC).
Evans, B. (2005) ‘Equality’, in Blakeley, G. and Bryson, V. (eds.), Marx and Other Four-Letter Words (London: Pluto), 176–91.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1977) The Feminists: Women's Emancipation Movements in Europe, America and Australasia 1840–1920 (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Everingham, C. (2002) ‘Engendering Time. Gender Equity and Discourses of Workplace Flexibility’, Time and Society 11, 2/3: 335–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folbre, N. and Bittman, M. (eds.) (2004) Family Time: The Social Organisation of Care (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Fraser, M. (2000) ‘After the Family Wage: A Postindustrial Thought Experiment’, in Hobson, B. (ed.), Gender and Citizenship in Transition (Basingstoke: Macmillan), 1–32.Google Scholar
Friedan, B. (1986[1963]) The Feminine Mystique (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. (2000) Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society(Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gornick, J. and Meyers, M. (2003) Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
Kershaw, P. (2005) Carefair. Rethinking the Responsibilities and Rights of Citizenship (Vancouver: UBG Press).Google Scholar
Lister, R. (2003) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives (Basingstoke: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, K. (1985) Sexual Politics (London: Virago).Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. (1977) The Hard Way Up (London: Virago).Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers (2005) ‘The Nordic Cooperation Programme on Gender Equality 2005’, www.norden.org/pub (visited 16/06/06).
Pearson, A. (2002) I Don't Know How She Does It (London: Quality Paperbacks Direct).Google Scholar
Shephard-Robinson, L. and Lovenduski, J. (2002) ‘Women and Candidate Selection in British Political Parties’ (London: Fawcett Society).
Taylor, B. (1983) Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century (London: Virago).Google Scholar
UNDP (2005) hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/ (visited 15 June 2006).
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1991) ‘Doing Gender’, in Lorber, J. and Farrell, S. (eds.), The Social Construction of Gender (London: Sage), 13–37.Google Scholar
Wild, S. (2003) Equal Pay in Europe: Making women's work pay in the UK (Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission).Google Scholar
Women and Equality Unit 2005 http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/domestic_violence/index.htm (visited 05/05/05).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×