Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:20:32.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Moral Dilemmas of Transitional Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Jon Elster
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Science, Columbia University, New York; Research Director, Institute for Social Research in Oslo, Norway
Peter Baumann
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Monika Betzler
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

“Transitional justice” refers to the process of coming to terms with the past in the transition to democracy. It includes, notably, trials, administrative and professional purges, restitution of property, and compensation for suffering. Notable examples of transitions to democracy that had some measure of transitional justice include

  • the demise of the Athenian oligarchs in 411 and then again in 403 b.c.;

  • the restoration of democracy after 1945 in countries that had been occupied by the Germans during World War II;

  • the return to or introduction of democracy after 1945 in the main Axis countries: Germany, Japan, Italy;

  • the fall of military dictatorships in Southern Europe in the mid-1970s;

  • the return to or introduction of democracy after 1989 in numerous countries in Eastern Europe;

  • the recent fall of the dictatorships in many Latin American countries, notably, Argentina, Chile, and Bolivia; and

  • the transition to democracy in South Africa.

These cases pose some extraordinary hard and sometimes unusual moral questions, for which we often lack firm intuitions. Here is a preliminary example: Among the agents of the Nazi or Communist regime, should the fanatic or the opportunist be punished more severely? In other words, is the personal commitment to an inhumane ideology an aggravating or an extenuating circumstance? In the fourth Provinciale, Pascal heaps scorn on the Jesuits, who teach that one cannot sin if one does not know that what one is doing is wrong.

Type
Chapter
Information
Practical Conflicts
New Philosophical Essays
, pp. 295 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andenæs, J. 1980. Det Vanskelige Oppgj⊘ret. Oslo: Tanum-Norli
Cepl, V. 1991. A Note on the Restitution of Property in Post-Communist Czechoslovakia. Journal of Communist Studies 7: 368–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deák, I. N. d. Political Justice in Austria and Hungary after World War II. Unpublished manuscript
Domenico, R. P. 1991. Italian Fascists on Trial. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
Dyzenhaus, D. 1998. Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves: Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order. Oxford: Hart Publishing
Elster, J. 1989. Solomonic Judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Elster, J. 1999. Alchemies of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Halmai, G., and K. Scheppele. 1997. Living Well Is the Best Revenge: The Hungarian Approach to Judging the Past. In A. J. McAdams (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 155–84
Hamber, B. 1998. Past Imperfect. Derry/Londonderry: INCORE
Herf, J. 1997. Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in Two Germanies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Hjeltnes, G. 1990. Avisoppgj⊘ret etter 1945. Oslo: Aschehoug
Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press
Huyse, L., and S. Dhondt. 1993. La Répression des collaborations. Bruxelles: CRISP
Kirchheimer, O. 1961. Political Justice. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
Le Grand, J. 1992. Equity and Justice. London: Routledge
Loening, T. C. 1987. The Reconciliation Agreement of 403/402 B. C. in Athens. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag
Lottman, H. 1986. L'Épuration. Paris: Fayard
Mason, H. L. 1952. The Purge of Dutch Quislings. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
McAdams, A. J. 1997. Communism on Trial: The East German Past and the German Future. In A. J. McAdams (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 239–67
McAdams, A. J. 2001. Judging the Past in Unified Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Müller, I. 1991. Hitler's Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Norges Offentlige Utredninger. 1997. Inndragning av J⊘disk Eiendom i Norge under den 2. Verdenskrig. Oslo
Novick, P. 1968. The Resistance versus Vichy. London: Chatto and Windus
Pogany, I. 1997. Righting Wrongs in Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Pross, C. 1998. Paying for the Past. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
Quint, P. 1997. The Imperfect Union. Princeton, N.J.: University Press
Rochebrune, R. de, and J.-C. Hachera. 1995. Les Patrons sous l'Occupation. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob
Sa'adah, A. 1998. Germany's Second Chance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Schwartz, H. 2000. Constitutional Justice in Central and Eastern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Sheppard, B. 2000. A War of Nerves: Soldiers and Psychiatrists 1914–1994. London: Cape
Tamm, D. 1984. Retsopg⊘ret efter Besættelsen. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag
Taylor, T. 1992. The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials. New York: Knopf
Thaler, R. 1980. Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A. 1999. Paranoids May Be Persecuted: Post-Totalitarian Retroactive Justice. European Journal of Sociology 40: 56–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walicki, A. 1997. Transitional Justice and the Political Struggles of Post-Communist Poland. In A. J. McAdams (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 185–238

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Moral Dilemmas of Transitional Justice
    • By Jon Elster, Professor of Social Science, Columbia University, New York; Research Director, Institute for Social Research in Oslo, Norway
  • Edited by Peter Baumann, University of Aberdeen, Monika Betzler, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: Practical Conflicts
  • Online publication: 02 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Moral Dilemmas of Transitional Justice
    • By Jon Elster, Professor of Social Science, Columbia University, New York; Research Director, Institute for Social Research in Oslo, Norway
  • Edited by Peter Baumann, University of Aberdeen, Monika Betzler, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: Practical Conflicts
  • Online publication: 02 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Moral Dilemmas of Transitional Justice
    • By Jon Elster, Professor of Social Science, Columbia University, New York; Research Director, Institute for Social Research in Oslo, Norway
  • Edited by Peter Baumann, University of Aberdeen, Monika Betzler, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: Practical Conflicts
  • Online publication: 02 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.014
Available formats
×