Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:38:57.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Literacy, reification and the dynamics of social interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

David Barton
Affiliation:
Professor of Language and Literacy, Department of Linguistics, Lancaster University; Director of the Lancaster Literacy Research Centre
Mary Hamilton
Affiliation:
Professor of Adult Learning and Literacy, Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University
David Barton
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Karin Tusting
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

We work in Literacy Studies and approach the notion of community of practice to see how it can strengthen or challenge what we do. The field of literacy studies has developed in parallel with communities of practice work over the past twenty years. The two approaches have common roots in the work of Scribner and Cole (1981), but then the fields of situated learning and situated literacies largely developed separately. Our overall point is that the framings provided by theories of language, literacy, discourse and power are central to understanding the dynamics of communities of practice, but they are not made explicit in Wenger's formulations. These ideas form the basis of this and the following chapter. Our own work has examined the literacy practices of everyday life (as in Barton and Hamilton 1998; Barton, Hamilton and Ivanič 2000), and here we see that most social interactions in contemporary society, including those covered by Wenger, are textually mediated; this shapes, structures and constrains them. We will argue that the concept of reification in the communities of practice work is key to making the link with literacy studies.

In this chapter, we start out from the vignettes that form the data for Wenger's work in his 1998 book. We examine them through the lens of literacy studies, demonstrating the centrality of literacy practices and arguing that a textually mediated social world is revealed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Communities of Practice
Language Power and Social Context
, pp. 14 - 35
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, D. (2001) Directions for literacy research: analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world. Language and Education 15 (2 & 3) 92–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D. and Hamilton, M. (1998) Local Literacies – Reading and Writing in One Community. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (eds) (2000) Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, L. and Holland, D. (2002) Theorizing the space of literacy practices. Ways of Knowing 2 (1) 10–22Google Scholar
Belfiore, M. E., Defoe, T., Folinsbee, S., Hunter, J. and Jackson, N. S. (2004) Reading Work: Literacies in the New Workplace. London: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1996) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
Brandt, T. and Clinton, K. (2002) Limits of the local: expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research 34 (3) 337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. (2002) A new kind of symmetry: actor-network theories and the new literacy studies. Studies in the Education of Adults 34 (2) 107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. (2003) Ordering subjects: actor-networks and intellectual technologies in lifelong learning, Studies in the Education of Adults 35 (1) 54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Fawns, M. and R. Ivanič (2001) Form-filling as a social practice: Taking power into our own hands. In Tett, L., Hamilton, M. and Crowther, J. (eds), Powerful Literacies. Leicester: NIACE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Fox, S. (2000) Communities of practice, Foucalt and Actor-Network Theory. Journal of Management Studies 37 (6) 853–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996) The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism. London: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Gowen, S. G. (1992) The Politics of Workplace Literacy: A Case Study. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. (2001) Privileged literacies: policy, institutional process and the life of the IALS. Language and Education 15 178–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D. and Cain, C. (1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Holland, D. and Lave, J. (2001) History in Person: Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practice, Intimate Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research PressGoogle Scholar
Hull, G. (ed) (1997) Changing Work, Changing Workers: Critical Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Skills. New York: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R. and Scheeres, H. (2003) Doing work to talking work: renegotiating knowing, doing, and identity. Applied Linguistics 24 (3) 316–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. (2000) Becoming just another alphanumeric code: farmers' encounters with the literacy and discourse practices of agricultural bureaucracy at the livestock auction. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (eds), Situated Literacies. London: Routledge, 70–90Google Scholar
Kress, G. and Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (1994) Organizing Modernity. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, M., D. Roach, A. Karach and F. V. Dijk (1994) Women and literacy for change. In Hamilton, M., Barton, D. and Ivanič, R. (eds), Worlds of Literacy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 215–224Google Scholar
Miettinen, R. (1999) The riddle of things: activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6 (3) 170–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardoe, S. (2000) Respect and the pursuit of symmetry in researching literacy and student writing. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (eds), Situated Literacies. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Power, M. (1999) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (2001) Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981) The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. (1990) Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. (1999) Writing the Social: Critique, Theory and Investigation. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
Solin, A. (2001) Tracing Texts: Intertextuality in Environmental Discourse. Department of English, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tusting, K. (2000) The new literacy studies and time: an exploration. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (eds), Situated Literacies. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. (1981) Informed design for forms. Information Design Journal 2 151–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×