Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T12:51:18.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Measurement of skin colour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Ashley H. Robins
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town Medical School and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town
Get access

Summary

Measurement techniques

The scientific study of human skin colour requires accurate measuring instruments. Before the latter became available verbal descriptions of skin colour had to suffice. It is true that terms such as ‘black’, ‘brown’ and ‘white’ (or ‘blond’ and ‘brunet’) are universally understood and each can be further qualified as light, medium or dark, but verbal descriptions such as these are only really applicable to broad categories and they are not discriminating enough to identify gradations of skin colour within and between populations. In the same way, a verbal description of a green paint would be totally inadequate for the selection of an accurate colour match. Furthermore, verbal reporting relies on subjectivity and this often introduces bias and distortion. Any form of measurement which seeks scientific acceptability must use standardized methods that are not only reliable and objective but easily reproducible.

In order to meet these needs various colour-matching techniques have been devised (e.g. Gates's tinted papers). The most widely used of these has been von Luschan's skin colour tablets. These consist of a set of small ceramic tiles consecutively numbered from 1 to 36 and ranging from pure white to black. There have also been colour atlases (e.g. the Munsell system and the Medical Colour Standard for Skin) which have provided sets of standard colour chips for skin matching. However, these methods have the disadvantages not only of subjectivity but that the surface texture of the chip or tile may not resemble that of the skin (or may have deteriorated with time) so that matching becomes imperfect.

Another colour-matching method was the Bradley colour top.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×