Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:28:07.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Marketable and non-marketable assets in households' portfolios: a cross-country comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2010

Vittorio Conti
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano
Rony Hamaui
Affiliation:
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Notwithstanding the differentiated institutional settings prevailing in Europe, the current debate on the ongoing creation of a European internal market largely assumes a substantial degree of homogeneity of agents' behaviour across individual countries. In particular, as far as the European financial liberalisation is concerned, the existing degree of capital mobility provides the basis for the assumption of behavioural similarity underlying the treatment of matters such as fiscal harmonisation. However, a common sense observation would suggest that, along with taxation systems, other institutional arrangements can ultimately affect agents' behaviour, including a certain degree of heterogeneity among European countries which could, in turn, lead to a reconsideration of the fiscal harmonisation process itself.

Following this line of research, the present chapter focusses on the determinants of the structure of households' financial portfolios in order to single out similarities among selected European countries. To this end the chapter discusses and estimates an augmented portfolio model incorporating a number of salient institutional features through the key distinction between marketable and non-marketable assets. The powerful role of non-marketable wealth in determining portfolio allocation has long been recognised in the theoretical as well as in the empirical literature. In principle, the presence of non-marketable (highly if not perfectly non-liquid) assets implies that, even with the assumption of homogeneous expectations, investors do hold different portfolios of marketable assets. It is not surprising, therefore, that empirical applications have been (successfully) confined to the analysis of individual data which capture well the effects due to structural differences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×