Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T15:45:48.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Litigating Climate Change at the Coal Mine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

William C. G. Burns
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University, School of Law
Hari M. Osofsky
Affiliation:
Washington and Lee University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In Australia, the most prominent climate change cases have involved attempts to stop greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of coal before that coal is even mined. Suing under state or national environmental impact assessment laws, Australian environmentalists have sought to compel government agencies responsible for approving coal mining projects to consider the very significant amounts of greenhouse gases that will be emitted at the time that the mined coal is burned to generate energy. With this approach, environmentalists have had some notable success in ensuring that such “indirect” or “downstream” greenhouse gas emissions are assessed as part of the decision-making process.

The Australian coal mining cases analyzed in this chapter are harbingers of a potentially large wave of legal actions that could arise under environmental impact laws in jurisdictions throughout the world. Environmentalists dissatisfied with their government's climate change policies are particularly likely to seek remedies through the judiciary where possible. Yet as they do, they will inevitably confront complex and difficult issues regarding how and the extent to which a particular project under consideration can be said to have an impact on the global climate. Whether and how greenhouse gas emissions should be assessed in the context of environmental impact studies for particular local projects is a key question for environmental policy in our new carbon-constrained world.

Australia is a fitting place for climate change activists to lodge novel claims about the climate change implications of coal mining.

Type
Chapter
Information
Adjudicating Climate Change
State, National, and International Approaches
, pp. 48 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stewart, Richard B., A New Generation of Environmental Regulation?, 29 Cap. U. L. Rev. 21, 182 (2001)Google Scholar
Davies, Anne, Appeal on Green Ruling Likely, Sydney Morning Herald (November 29, 2006)Google Scholar
Davies, Anne, Landmark Climate Change Ruling Puts Heat on Industry, Sydney Morning Herald (November 28, 2006)Google Scholar
Warren, Matthew, Planning May Face Climate Test, The Australian (November 28, 2006)Google Scholar
Clayton, Mark, New Coal Plants Bury ‘Kyoto’: New Greenhouse-Gas Emissions from China, India, and the US Will Swamp Cuts from the Kyoto Treaty, Christian Sci. Monitor (December 23, 2004)Google Scholar
Hodas, David, Standing and Climate Change: Can Anyone Complain about the Weather? 15 J. Land Use & Envtl. L.451 (2000)Google Scholar
Carlson, Ann E., Standing for the Environment, 45 U.C.L.A. L. Rev. 931 (1998)Google Scholar
Barak, Aharon, Foreword: A Judge on Judging: The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy, 116, Harv. L. Rev.16, 106–10 (2002)Google Scholar
Handley, Matt, Comment: Why Crocodiles, Elephants, and American Citizens Should Prefer Foreign Courts: A Comparative Analysis of Standing to Sue, 21 Rev. Litig.97 (2002)Google Scholar
Mank, Bradford C., Standing and Global Warming: Is Injury to All Injury to None?35 Envtl. L. 1, 45–63 (2005)Google Scholar
Fischman, Robert L., The EPA's NEPA Duties and Ecosystem Services, 20 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 497, 512 (2001)Google Scholar
Thatcher, Terence L., Understanding Interdependence in the Natural Environment: Some Thoughts on Cumulative Impact Assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act, 20 Envtl. L.611 (1990)Google Scholar
Australian Judge Blocks Coal Mine on Climate Grounds, Envtl. News Service (November 29, 2006)
Law Changes Won't Solve Climate Change: Campbell, ABC News Online (Nov. 28, 2006)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×