Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:32:43.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Topological Models for Oriented Matroids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Anders Björner
Affiliation:
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Michel Las Vergnas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Probabilités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Bernd Sturmfels
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Neil White
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Gunter M. Ziegler
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

It was described already in Chapter 1 how realizable oriented matroids correspond to arrangements of hyperplanes in Rd. The content of the Topological Representation Theorem is that general oriented matroids similarly correspond to arrangements of generalized hyperplanes, each obtained from a flat hyperplane by tame topological deformation. This important result, the proof of which was begun already in the preceding chapter, is the main concern of this chapter. In the last section it is discussed to what extent points rather than hyperplanes can be used to represent the elements of an oriented matroid in a topologically deformed arrangement. It turns out that in the non-realizable case there are severe limitations to such an analogue of projective polarity.

Arrangements of pseudospheres

A linear oriented matroid can be described as an arrangement A of oriented hyperplanes through the origin in Rd+1. This information is equivalently represented by the arrangement A′ = {HSd : H ε A} of linear (d – l)-subspheres in Sd together with a choice of orientation (positive and negative hemisphere) for each HSd. If these subspheres are topologically deformed in a tame way that preserves their intersection pattern, the arrangement will still represent an oriented matroid. This idea leads to “arrangements of pseudospheres”, which will be discussed in this section.

We start with a discussion of codimension 1 subspheres of Sd. If S is a (d–1)-sphere embedded in Sd (i.e., SSd and S is homeomorphic to Sd-1), then by the Jordan-Brouwer separation theorem Sd\S consists of two connected components such that S is the boundary of each.

Type
Chapter
Information
Oriented Matroids , pp. 225 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×