Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T03:22:40.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Disability equality training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Barbara A. Wilson
Affiliation:
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
D. L. McLellan
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The primary focus of this chapter is to describe the philosophy behind Disability Equality Training (DET) and its use in challenging employment discrimination. DET is a short training programme of one or two days that has been developed by disabled people for employers. The training aims to provide delegates with an understanding of the social model of disability. This will help them improve their organisations' policies and procedures in order to reduce the impact of institutional discrimination on disabled applicants and employees.

Previous alternative attempts to reduce this discrimination have not worked. Legislation which has imposed a quota of disabled people on employers and attitude modification programmes designed in the USA have failed to combat discrimination. Alternative approaches are needed (Duckworth, 1995). This chapter introduces one such approach that is based on the social model of disability. This model rejects the assumption that employment discrimination results solely from the negative attitudes of employers as being too simplistic. It favours viewing discrimination as a process institutionalised within social organisation.

Initially the experience of discrimination is considered with reference to the changing nature of work. Then the construction of the ‘disability category’ is described with regard to the development of the social model of disability as based on the underlying ideology. The utility of the social model in challenging employment discrimination is considered by contrasting its application with the individual (medical and tragedy) model. Next the social model is developed to suggest a new and probably more realistic reason for the failure of the quota scheme. This discussion concludes by presenting a new definition of disability.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×