Abrams, Meyer Howard. “Theories of Metaphor.” In A Glossary of Literary Terms, 7th edition. Fort Worth, etc.: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar

Adelson, Deborah. “Interpreting Berlioz's Overture to King Lear, Opus 4: Problems and Solutions.” Current Musicology 35 (1983), 46–56.Google Scholar

Albright, Daniel. Berlioz's Semi-Operas. Rochester, N. Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, William. Donizetti and His Operas. Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Iswolsky, H.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Banks, Paul. “Coherence and Diversity in the Symphonie fantastique.” 19th-Century Music 8/1 (Summer 1984), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoli, Jean-Pierre. “Beethoven, Shakespeare, and Berlioz's Scéne d'amour.” In Peter Bloom, ed., Berlioz: Scenes from the Life and Work. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2008, pp. 139–60.Google Scholar

Bartoli, Jean-Pierre. “Berlioz, Reicha et la ‘Formenlehre.’” In Döhring, Sieghart, Jacobshagen, Arnold, and Braam, Gunter, eds., Berlioz, Wagner und die Deutschen. Cologne: Dohr, 2003, pp. 227–38.Google Scholar

Bartoli, Jean-Pierre. “Forme narrative et principes du développement musical dans la Symphonie fantastique de Berlioz.” Musurgia: Analyse et pratique musicales 2/1 (1995), 25–50.Google Scholar

Bartoli, Jean–Pierre. “Forme symphonique.” In Citron, Pierre and Reynaud, Cécile, eds., Dictionnaire Berlioz. Paris: Fayard, 2003, pp. 199–201.Google Scholar

Bartoli, Jean–Pierre. “Les Ouvertures de Berlioz et la dramatisation du style symphonique.” Les Cahiers de l'Herne 77 (2003), 96–104.Google Scholar

Bartoli, Jean–Pierre. L'uvre symphonique de Berlioz: Forme et principes de développement. Thèse, Université de Paris IV (Paris-Sorbonne), 1991.Google Scholar

Bartoli, Jean–Pierre. “Variation.” In Citron, Pierre and Reynaud, Cécile, eds., Dictionnaire Berlioz. Paris: Fayard, 2003, pp. 570–1.Google Scholar

Barzun, Jacques. Berlioz and the Romantic Century. 2 vols. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1969. Originally published by Little, Brown and Company, 1950.Google Scholar

Barzun, Jacques. “Fourteen Points about Berlioz and the Public, or Why There Is Still a Berlioz Problem.” In , Bloom, ed., Berlioz: Past, Present, Future: Bicentenary Essays. Rochester, N. Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2003, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar

Barzun, Jacques. “The Meaning of Meaning in Music: Berlioz Once More.” Musical Quarterly 66/1 (1980), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, Eddie Covington. “Thematic Procedures in the Symphonies of Berlioz.” Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, 1964.

Batteux, Charles. Les beaux-arts réduits à un même principe. Paris: Durand, 1746.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian. Phantastik als Konstruktion: Hector Berlioz’ “Symphonie fantastique.” Kieler Schriften zur Musikwissenschaft, xxvii. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1983.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. “Aperçu sur la musique classique et la musique romantique.” Le Correspondant, October 22, 1830.

Berlioz, Hector. The Art of Music and Other Essays. Ed. and trans. Csicsery-Rónay, Elizabeth. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. Berlioz's Orchestration Treatise: A Translation and Commentary. Ed. and trans. Macdonald, Hugh. Cambridge University Press, 2002. Originally published as Grand traité d'instrumentation et d'orchestration modernes. Paris: Schonenberger, 1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. “Biographie étrangère: Beethoven.” Le Correspondant, August 4, 11, October 8, 1829.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. Correspondance générale de Hector Berlioz. 6 vols. Gen. ed. Citron, Pierre. Vol. I: 1803–32, ed. Citron, Pierre. Vol. II: 1832–42, ed. Robert, Frédéric. Vol. III: 1842–50, ed. Citron, . Vol. IV: 1851–5, ed. Yves Gérard, Citron, Macdonald, Hugh. Vol. V: 1855–9, ed. François Lesure, Macdonald. Vol. VI: 1859–63, ed. Lesure, Macdonald. Paris: Flammarion, 1972–2003.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. A Critical Study of Beethoven's Nine Symphonies With a Few Words on His Trios and Sonatas, A Criticism of “Fidelio,” and an Introductory Essay on Music. Translated by Evans, E.. London: W. Reeves, 1958. Reprinted with an introduction by D. Kern Holoman. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2000. Originally published in À travers chants: études musicales, adorations, boutades, et critiques. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1862, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. La Critique musicale d'Hector Berlioz. Gen. ed. Gérard, Yves. Vol. I: 1823–34, ed. Cohen, H. Robert and Gérard, Yves. Vol. II: 1835–6, ed. Coudroy-Saghaï, Marie-Hélène and Bongrain, Anne. Vol. III: 1837–8, ed. Bongrain, and Coudroy-Saghaï, . Vol. IV: 1839–41, ed. Bongrain, and Coudroy-Saghaï, . Vol. V: 1842–4, ed. Bongrain, and Coudroy-Saghaï, . Paris: Buchet/Chastel, 1996–.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. Evenings with the Orchestra. Ed. and trans. Barzun, Jacques. University of Chicago Press, 1999. Originally published as Les Soirées de l'orchestre. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1852. Critical edition edited by Léon Guichard. Paris: Gründ, 1968.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. Hector Berlioz: New Edition of the Complete Works. 26 vols. Gen. ed. Macdonald, Hugh. Kassel, etc.: Bärenreiter, 1969–2005.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. The Memoirs of Hector Berlioz. Ed. and trans. Cairns, David. New York and Toronto: Knopf, 2002. Originally published as Mémoires d'Hector Berlioz. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1870. Critical edition ed. Calmann-Lévy. Paris, 1978.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. The Musical Madhouse: An English Translation of Berlioz's Les Grotesques de la Musique. Ed. Bruce, Alastair. Rochester, N. Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2003. Originally published as Les Grotesques de la musique. Paris: Bourdrilliat, 1859. Critical edition ed. Léon Guichard. Paris: Gründ, 1969.Google Scholar

Berlioz, Hector. “On Imitation in Music.” Trans. Barzun, Jacques with restorations by Cone, Edward T., in Cone, , ed., Berlioz: Fantastic Symphony. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1971, pp. 36–46. Originally published in Revue et Gazette musicale, January 1 and 8, 1837. Trans. Barzun, Jacques as “The Limits of Music,” in Barzun, , ed., Pleasures of Music: A Reader's Choice of Great Writing About Music and Musicians From Cellini to Bernard Shaw. New York: Viking Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Black, Max. Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Bloom, Peter. “Berlioz and the Critic: ‘La Damnation de Fétis.’ ” In Hill, John W., ed., Studies in Musicology in Honor of Otto E. Albrecht. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1980, pp. 240–65.Google Scholar

Bloom, Peter. ed. Berlioz: Past, Present, Future: Bicentenary Essays. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2003.

Bloom, Peter, ed. Berlioz Studies. Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRef

Bloom, Peter, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRef

Bloom, Peter. The Life of Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bloom, Peter. Scenes from the Life and Work. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bockholdt, Rudolph. Berlioz-Studien. Tutzing: Schneider, 1979.Google Scholar

Bonds, Mark Evan. “Idealism and the Aesthetics of Instrumental Music at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 50/2–3 (Summer–Autumn 1997), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonds, Mark Evan. “Sinfonia Anti-Eroica : Berlioz's Harold en Italie and the Anxiety of Beethoven's Influence.” Journal of Musicology 10/4 (1992), 417–63. Republished as “Sinfonia anti-eroica : Berlioz's Harold en Italie,” in After Beethoven: Imperatives of Originality in the Symphony. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996, pp. 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyé, Michel. L'Expression musicale mise au rang des chimères. Paris and Amsterdam, 1779.Google Scholar

Braam, Gunther and Arnold Jacobshagen, eds. Hector Berlioz in Deutschland: Texte und Dokumente zur deutschen Berlioz-Rezeption (1829–1843). Göttingen: Heinholz, 2002.

Brittan, Francesca. “Berlioz and the Pathological Fantastic: Melancholy, Monomania, and Romantic Autobiography.” 19th-Century Music 29/3 (Spring 2006), 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budd, Malcolm. “Music and the Communication of Emotion.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47, 129–38.CrossRef

Budd, Malcolm. “Understanding Music.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. LIX, 233–48.

Burnham, Scott “Aesthetics, Theory and History in the Works of Adolph Bernhard Marx.” Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University, 1988.

Cairns, David. Berlioz 1803–1832: The Making of an Artist. London: Deutsch, 1989.Google Scholar

Cairns, David. Berlioz 1832–1869: Servitude and Greatness. London: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar

Cairns, David. “Berlioz and Beethoven.” In Bloom, Peter, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 223–34.Google Scholar

Cairns, David. “Spontini's Influence on Berlioz.” In Weiner, Dora B. and Keylor, William R., eds., From Parnassus: Essays in Honor of Jacques Barzun. New York: Harper and Row, 1976, pp. 24–41.Google Scholar

Caplin, William E.Classical Form: A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Chabanon, Michel-Paul Guy. Musique considérée en elle-même, et dans ses rapports avec la parole, les langues, la poésie, et le théâtre. Paris, 1785.Google Scholar

Chabanon, Michel-Paul Guy. Observations sur la musique et principalement sur la métaphysique de l'art. Paris, 1779. Reprinted, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1969.Google Scholar

Chailley, Jacques. “Roméo et Juliette.” Revue de musicologie 63/1–2, Colloque Hector Berlioz (1977), 115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René. Atala, René. Ed. Crump, Phyllis. Manchester University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René. Atala, René. Trans. Putter, Irving. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René. Génie du Christianisme. 2 vols. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1966.Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René. Citron, Pierre, ed. Mémoires. Paris: Flammarion, 1991.

Citron, Pierre and Cécile, Reynaud, eds. Dictionnaire Berlioz. Paris: Fayard, 2003.

Cockrell, Dale. “Berlioz and le système Shakespearien.” Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, 1978.

Cohn, Richard. “Uncanny Resemblances: Tonal Signification in the Freudian Age.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 57/2 (Summer 2004), 285–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Michael. “Refining the Knowledge of Revisions in Berlioz's Roméo et Juliette.” Paper presented at the Berlioz Bicentennial Conference, Hector Berlioz in the Age of French Romanticism, Denton, Texas, November 12, 2003.

Condé, Gérard. “Programme, musique à.” In Citron, Pierre and Reynaud, Cécile, eds., Dictionnaire Berlioz. Paris: Fayard, 2003, pp. 441–2.Google Scholar

Cone, Edward T., ed. Berlioz: Fantastic Symphony. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1971.

Cone, Edward T.. “Berlioz: Romeo and Juliet” (record review). Musical Quarterly 39 (1953), 475–8.CrossRef

Cone, Edward T.. “Inside the Saint's Head: The Music of Berlioz.” In Morgan, Robert P., ed., Music: A View From Delft. University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 217–48. Originally published in Musical Newsletter, USA 1/3 (July 1971), 3–13; 1/4 (October 1971), 16–21; and 2/1 (January 1972), 19–22.Google Scholar

Cone, Edward T.. “A Lesson From Berlioz.” In The Composer's Voice. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974, pp. 81–114.Google Scholar

Cook, Nicholas. A Guide to Musical Analysis. London and Melbourne: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1987.Google Scholar

,“Couplet.” In Encyclopédie de la musique, vol. I. Paris: Fasquelle, 1958.Google Scholar

,“Couplet.” In Petit Larousse. Paris: Librarie Larousse, 1967.Google Scholar

Cumming, Naomi. “Metaphor in Roger Scruton's Aesthetics of Music.” In Pople, Anthony, ed., Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, Carl. Nineteenth-Century Music. Trans. Robinson, J. Bradford. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Darcy, Warren. “Bruckner's Sonata Deformations.” In Jackson, Timothy L. and Hawkshaw, Paul, eds., Bruckner Studies. Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 256–77.Google Scholar

Darcy, Warren. “The Metaphysics of Annihilation: Wagner, Schopenhauer, and the Ending of the Ring.” Music Theory Spectrum 16/1 (Spring 1994), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darcy, Warren. “Rotational Form, Teleological Genesis, and Fantasy-Projection in the Slow Movement of Mahler's Sixth Symphony.” 19th-Century Music 25/1 (2001), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darcy, Warren. “‘Sie bleiben wie Allen’: Rotational Form and the Thematization of Failure in Mahler's Fish Sermon.” Paper presented at Music Theory Midwest, Minneapolis, Minn., May 17, 2002.

Darcy, Warren. Wagner's “Das Rheingold.” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “What Metaphors Mean.” Critical Inquiry 5 (1978), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Stephen. Musical Meaning and Expression. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Day, James and Huray, Peter, eds. Music and Aesthetics in the Eighteenth and Early-Nineteenth Centuries. Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Debussy, Claude. Gil Blas, May 8, 1903.

Debussy, Claude. Monsieur Croche et autres écrits. Ed. Lesure, François. Paris: Gallimard, 1971.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Alan Edgar Frederic. The Music of Berlioz. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Döhring, Sieghart, Arnold, Jacobshagen, and Gunther, Braam, eds. Berlioz, Wagner und die Deutschen, Cologne: Dohr, 2003.

Dömling, Wolfgang. “‘En songeant au temps … à l'espace …’: Über einige Aspekte der Musik Hector Berlioz,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 33/4 (1976), 250–4.Google Scholar

Dömling, Wolfgang. Hector Berlioz: Symphonie fantastique. Meisterwerke der Musik, 19. Munich: Fink, 1985.Google Scholar

Ellis, Katharine. Music Criticism in Nineteenth-Century France: La Revue et Gazette musicale de Paris, 1834–1880. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, Hans. “Couplet.” In Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, vol. II. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1949–86, pp. 1737–43.Google Scholar

Esquirol, Étienne. Des maladies mentales: considérées sous les rapports médical, hygiénique et médico-légal, 2 vols. Paris: Ballière, 1838.Google Scholar

Esquirol, Étienne. “Monomania.” In Dictionnaire des Sciences Médicales 34 (1819), pp. 117–22.Google Scholar

Fauser, Annegret. “The Songs.” In Bloom, Peter, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 108–26.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Donald. Masterworks of the Orchestral Repertoire. University of Minneapolis Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Fétis, François-Joseph. “Critical Analysis: Episode in the Life of an Artist, Grand Fantastic Symphony by Hector Berlioz, Opus 4, Piano-Score by Franz Liszt.” Trans. Cone, Edward T., in Cone, , ed., Berlioz: Fantastic Symphony. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1971, pp. 215–20. Originally published in Revue musicale, February 1, 1835.Google Scholar

Fétis, François-Joseph. La musique mise à la portée de tout le monde. Paris: Brandus et Cie, 1847; orig. pub. Mesnier, 1830.Google Scholar

Fétis, François-Joseph. Preface to the printed program of the Symphonie fantastique. Revue musicale, November 27, 1830.

Fouque, Octave. Les révolutionnaires de la musique: Lesueur, Berlioz, Beethoven, Richard Wagner, La musique Russe. Paris, 1882.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Christopher H. “Beyond Song: Instrumental Transformations and Adaptations of the Lied from Schubert to Mahler.” In Parsons, James, ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Lied. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 223–42.Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas. “Richard Wagner and the Aesthetics of Musical Form in the mid-19th Century (1840–1860).” Ph.D. diss., University of California Berkeley, 1988.

Grey, Thomas. Wagner's Musical Prose: Texts and Contexts. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, Thomas. “Wagner, the Overture, and the Aesthetics of Musical Form.” 19th-Century Music 9/1 (Summer 1988), 11–17.Google Scholar

Guck, Marion. “Analytical Fictions.” Music Theory Spectrum 16/2 (Fall 1994), 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guck, Marion. “Two Types of Metaphoric Transfer.” In Kassler, Jamie C., ed., Metaphor: A Musical Dimension. Sydney: Currency Press, 1991, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Haar, James. “The Operas and the Dramatic Legend.” In Bloom, Peter, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar

Hadow, William Henry. “Berlioz.” In Grove, Sir George, ed., A Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 2nd edition, ed. Maitland, J. A. Fuller, 5 vols. London: Macmillan and Co., 1927, vol. I, pp. 310–15. Originally published 1904.Google Scholar

Hadow, W. H.. Studies in Modern Music I: Berlioz, Schumann, Wagner. London, 1893.Google Scholar

Hambrick, Jennifer. “Berlioz's ‘Dramatic Symphony’: Genre and Genre Mixture in Roméo et Juliette.” Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2002.

Hanslick, Eduard. Vom Musikalisch-Schönen: ein Beitrag zur Revision der Ästhetik der Tonkunst. Leipzig, 1854/R, 2/1858, 3/1865, 4/1874, 9/1896, 16/1966. English trans., Weigel, G. Payzant, 1986.

Hatten, Robert. “Metaphor in Music.” In Tarasti, Eero, ed., Musical Signification: Essays in the Semiotic Theory and Analysis of Music. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995, pp. 373–91.Google Scholar

Hatten, Robert. Musical Meaning in Beethoven: Markedness, Correlation, and Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Heller, Stephen. Review of Roméo et Juliette. Gazette musicale, December 1839, and Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, Leipzig, January–February 1840.

Hepokoski, James. “Back and Forth from Egmont: Beethoven, Mozart, and the Nonresolving Recapitulation.” 19th-Century Music 25/2–3 (2002), 127–54.Google Scholar

Hepokoski, James. “Beethoven Reception: The Symphonic Tradition.” In Samson, Jim, ed., The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Music. Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 424–59.Google Scholar

Hepokoski, James. “Beyond the Sonata Principle.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 55/1 (Spring 2002), 91–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepokoski, James. “The Essence of Sibelius: Creation Myths and Rotational Cycles in Luonnotar.” In Ross, Glenda Dawn, ed., The Sibelius Companion. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1996, pp. 121–46.Google Scholar

Hepokoski, James. “Genre and Content in Mid-Century Verdi: ‘Addio, del passato’ (La traviata, Act III).” Cambridge Opera Journal 1/3 (November 1989), 249–76.Google Scholar

Hepokoski, James. “Rotations, Sketches, and the Sixth Symphony.” In Jackson, Timothy L. and Murtomäki, Veijo, eds., Sibelius Studies. Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 322–51.Google Scholar

Hepokoski, James. Sibelius: Symphony No. 5. Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepokoski, James. “Structure, Implication, and the End of Suor Angelica.” Studi pucciniani 3 (2004), 241–64.Google Scholar

Hepokoski, James and Darcy, Warren. Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata. Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepokoski, James and Darcy, Warren. “The Medial Caesura and its Role in the Eighteenth-Century Sonata Exposition.” Music Theory Spectrum 19/2 (Fall 1997), 115–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holoman, D. Kern. “Berlioz.” In Holoman, D. Kern, ed., The Nineteenth-Century Symphony. New York: Schirmer, 1997, pp. 108–41.Google Scholar

Holoman, D. Kern. Berlioz. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Holoman, D. Kern. Catalogue of the Works of Hector Berlioz, Hector Berlioz: New Edition of the Complete Works, vol. XXV. Kassel, etc.: Bärenreiter, 1987.Google Scholar

Holquist, Michael. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda. “Modern Parody and Bakhtin.” In Morson, Gary Saul and Emerson, Caryl, eds., Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1989, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Jullien, Adolphe. Review of Roméo et Juliette. Revue et Gazette musicale, December 5, 1875.

Kemp, Ian. “Romeo and Juliet and Roméo et Juliette.” In Bloom, Peter, ed., Berlioz Studies. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 37–79.Google Scholar

Kivy, Peter. Sound and Semblance: Reflections on Musical Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Knapp, Raymond. Symphonic Metamorphoses: Subjectivity and Alienation in Mahler's Re-Cycled Songs. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Lacépède, Comte, Bernard Germain Étienne de la Ville sur Illon. La Poétique de la musique. 2 vols. Paris, 1785.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Turner, Mark. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide of Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langford, Jeffrey. “The Byronic Berlioz: Harold en Italie and Beyond.” Journal of Musicological Research 16 (1997), 99–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langford, Jeffrey. “The ‘Dramatic Symphonies’ of Berlioz as an Outgrowth of the French Operatic Tradition.” Musical Quarterly 69 (1983), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sueur, Jean-François. Exposé d'une musique une, imitative et particulière à chaque solennité. 4 vols. Paris: Veuve Hérissant, 1787.Google Scholar

Libbey, Dennis. “Opera.” In Sadie, Stanley, ed., The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 20 vols. London and New York: Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 1980, vol. XIII.Google Scholar

Lidov, David. “Mind and Body in Music.” Semiotica 66/1–3 (1987), 69–97.Google Scholar

Liszt, Franz. “Berlioz und seine Haroldsymphonie.” In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. IV, ed. Ramann, Lina (1882). Wiesbaden, 1978, pp. 1–102. Originally published in the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 43 (July–August 1855). Portions translated in Strunk, Oliver, Source Readings in Music History, rev. edition, ed. Treitler, Leo. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1998, pp. 115–74.Google Scholar

Lussy, Mathis. “Chabanon, Précurseur de Hanslick.” Gazette musicale de la Suisse Romande, May 7, 1896, pp. 95–8.Google Scholar

Lyall, Harry Robert. “A French Music Aesthetic of the Eighteenth Century: A Translation and Commentary on Michel Paul Gui de Chabanon's Musique considérée en elle-même et dans ses rapports avec la parole, les langues, la poésie, et le théâtre.” Ph.D. diss., North Texas State University, 1975.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Hugh. “Berlioz.” In Macy, L., ed., Grove Music Online, www.grovemusic.com (accessed August 16, 2007).

Macdonald, Hugh. Berlioz. Oxford University Press, 2000. Originally published by J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd., 1982.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Hugh. “Berlioz's Messe solennelle.” 19th-Century Music 16/3 (Spring 1993), 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, Hugh. “Berlioz's Self-Borrowings.” Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association 92 (1965–6), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, Hugh. Liner notes for Berlioz, Symphonie fantastique. Ernest Ansermet and the Orchestre de la Suisse Romande. London Records Inc. CSA 2101.Google Scholar

Marx, Adolph Bernhard. Musical Form in the Age of Beethoven. Ed. and trans. Burnham, Scott. Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Micznik, Vera. “Of Ways of Telling: Intertextuality and Historical Evidence in Berlioz's Roméo et Juliette.” 19th-Century Music 24/1 (Summer 2000), 21–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mongrédien, Jean. Catalogue thématique de l’œuvre complète du compositeur Jean-François Le Sueur (1760–1837). New York: Pendragon, 1980.Google Scholar

Mongrédien, Jean. French Music From the Enlightenment to Romanticism. Translated by Frémaux, Sylvain. Portland: Amadeus Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Mongrédien, Jean. Jean-François Le Sueur, contribution à l’étude d'un demi-siècle de musique française (1780–1830). 2 vols. Berne: Peter Lang, 1980.Google Scholar

Morgan, Robert P. “Circular Form in the Tristan Prelude.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 53/1 (Spring 2000), 69–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morson, Gary Saul. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Noske, Fritz. French Song From Berlioz to Duparc. Trans. Benton, Rita. New York: Dover, 1970. Originally published as La Mélodie française de Berlioz à Duparc. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1954.Google Scholar

Pannain, Guido. Modern Composers. Trans. Bonavia, Michael R.. London, 1932.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Leon B. Schumann as Critic. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Preminger, Alex, ed. Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton University Press, 1974.CrossRef

Primmer, Brian. The Berlioz Style. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Raby, Peter. Fair Ophelia: A Life of Harriet Smithson Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Reeve, Katherine Kolb. “The Poetics of the Orchestra in the Writings of Hector Berlioz.” Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1978.

Reynaud, Cécile. “Regards sur la musique à programme chez Liszt et Berlioz.” In Döhring, Sieghart, Jacobshagen, Arnold, and Braam, Gunther, eds., Berlioz, Wagner, und die Deutschen. Cologne: Dohr, 2003, pp. 287–94.Google Scholar

Richards, Ivor Armstrong. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964. Originally published 1936.Google Scholar

Rodgers, Stephen. “The Miniatures of a Monumentalist: Berlioz's Romances (1842–50).” Unpublished.

Rosen, Charles. The Romantic Generation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Rushton, Julian. Berlioz: Roméo et Juliette. Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rushton, Julian. “The Genesis of Berlioz's ‘La Damnation de Faust.’” Music and Letters 56/2 (April 1975), 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rushton, Julian. “Genre in Berlioz.” In Bloom, Peter, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar

Rushton, Julian. The Music of Berlioz. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rushton, Julian. The Musical Language of Berlioz. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Saloman, Ora F. “La Cépède's La Poétique de la musique and Le Sueur.” Acta Musicologica 47 (1975), 144–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanford, G. T. “The Overtures of Hector Berlioz.” Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California, 1964.

Saslaw, Janna. “Forces, Containers, and Paths: The Role of Body-Derived Image Schemas in the Conceptualization of Music.” Journal of Music Theory 40/2 (1996), 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schacher, Thomas. Hector Berlioz: Roméo et Juliette. Munich: Fink, 1998.Google Scholar

Schmalfeldt, Janet. “Cadential Processes: The Evaded Cadence and the ‘One More Time’ Technique.” Journal of Musicological Research 1–2 (1992), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmusch, Rainer. Der Tod des Orpheus: Entstehungsgeschichte der Programmmusik. Freiburg: Rombach Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Schmusch, Rainer. Hector Berlioz: Autopsie des Künstlers. Munich: Edition Text & Kritik, 2000.Google Scholar

Schumann, Robert. “A Symphony by Berlioz.” Trans. Cone, Edward T., in Cone, , ed., Berlioz: Fantastic Symphony. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1971, pp. 230–48. Originally published in the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, July 3 and 31, August 7, 11, and 14, 1835. Reprinted in Schumann, Gesammelte Schriften. Leipzig: Georg Wigands Verlag, 1854, pp. 118–51.Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger. The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scruton, Roger. The Aesthetic Understanding: Essays in the Philosophy of Art and Culture. London: Methuen, 1983.Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger. “Programme music.” In Macy, L., ed., Grove Music Online, www.grovemusic.com (accessed February 10, 2007).

Shakespeare, William. Romeo and Juliet. In Blakemore, G., ed., The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1974.Google Scholar

Snarrenberg, Robert. “Competing Myths: The American Abandonment of Schenker's Organicism.” In Pople, Anthony, ed., Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music. Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 30–58.Google Scholar

Snarrenberg, Robert. Schenker's Interpretive Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spitzer, Michael. Metaphor and Musical Thought. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Stricker, Rémy. Berlioz dramaturge. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 2003.Google Scholar

Strunk, Oliver, ed. Source Readings in Music History. Rev. edn, ed. Treitler, Leo. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1998.Google Scholar

Temperley, Nicholas. “The Symphonie fantastique and its Program.” Musical Quarterly 57 (1971), 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tovey, Donald Francis. Essays in Musical Analysis. Vol. IV: Illustrative Music. London: Oxford University Press, 1965. Originally published 1937.Google Scholar

Vallas, Léon. “Berlioz.” In Sir Grove, George, ed., Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 5th edition, ed. Blom, Eric, 9 vols. London: Macmillan and Co., 1954, vol. I, pp. 653–73.Google Scholar

Wagner, Richard. “Über Franz Liszts symphonische Dichtungen.” In Sternfeld, Richard, ed., Sämtliche Schriften und Dichtungen, vol. V. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel/C. F. W. Siegel, pp. 1911–16.Google Scholar

Werbeck, Walter. Die Tondichtungen von Richard Strauss. Dokumente und Studien zu Richard Strauss 2. Tutzing: Hans Schneider, 1996.Google Scholar

Wotton, Tom. Hector Berlioz. Freeport, N.Y.: Books for Libraries Press, 1970. Originally published 1935.Google Scholar

Wotton, Tom. Studies in Modern Music I: Berlioz, Schumann, Wagner. New York: Macmillan, 1893.Google Scholar

Zbikowksi, Lawrence. Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar