,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www:cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/ (accessed October, 2007).

,American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task force on Cesarean Delivery Rates: Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery. June, 2000.

Villar, J, Valladares, E, et al. Ceasarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006; 367: 1819–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000. DHHS Publication No. 91–50213. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1991: 378–79.Google Scholar

Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, Neilson, J, et al. Cesarean section. In: A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000: 404–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, J, Paranjothy, S, RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Nelson, KB. Can we prevent cerebral palsy?N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1765–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, SL, Hankins, GD. Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy: fact and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 628–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

,National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean section: Clinical Guideline. RCOG Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Mammelle, N, David S, Vendittelli, F, et al. Perinatal health indicators in 2001 and its evolution since 1994. Results from the Audipog sentinel network. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2002; 30: 6–39.Google Scholar

,WHO website. www.who.int/whosis/database/ (accessed October, 2007).

Sreevidya, S, Sathiyasekaran, BW. High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross sectional study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110: 106–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Belizan, JM, Althabe, F, Barros, FC, Alexander, S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ 1999; 319: 1397–1400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rattner, D. Sobre a hipotese de estabilizacio das taxas de cesareo do Estado de Sao Paolo. Brasil Rev Saude Publica 1996; 30(1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odlind, V, Haglund, B, Pakkanen, M, Otterblad, Olausson P. Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden 1973–2000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 516–28.Google ScholarPubMed

Hendrix, NW, Chaucan, SP. Cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing. Obstet Gynecol N Am 2005; 32: 273–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stephenson, PA, Bakoula, C, Hemminki, E, et al. Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countries. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1993; 7: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Robinson, JN, Norwitz, ER, Cohen, AP, McElrath, TF, Lieberman, ES. Episiotomy, operative vaginal delivery, and significant perineal trauma in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 2105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christianson, LM, Bovbjerg, VE, McDavitt, EC, Hullfish, KL. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 255–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, JH, Figueroa, R, Garry, D, et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Casey, BM, Schaffer, JI, Bloom, SL, et al. Obstetric antecedents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1655–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, MC, Knuppel, RA, O'Brien, WF, et al. Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 688–94.Google ScholarPubMed

Uchil, D, Arulkumaran, S. Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58: 687–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, RB, Menon, BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD 00024.Google Scholar

Holroyde, J, Woods, JR Jr, Siddiqi, TA, Scott, M, Miodovnic, M. Birth trauma: incidence and predisposing factors. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 792–5.Google Scholar

Hughes, CA, Harley, EH, Milmoe, G, Bala, R, Martorella, A. Birth trauma in the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125: 193–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, WM, Nesbitt, TS, Danielson B. Associated factors in 1611 cases of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 536–40.Google Scholar

Levine, MG, Holroyde, J, Woods, JR Jr, et al. Birth trauma: incidence and predisposing factors. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 792–5.Google ScholarPubMed

Gebremariam, A. Subgaleal haemorrhage: risk factors and neurological and developmental outcome in survivors. Ann Trop Paediatr 1999; 19: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chadwick, LM, Pemberton, PJ, Kurinczuk, JJ. Neonatal subgaleal hematoma: associated risk factors, complications and outcome. J Paediatr Child Health 1996; 32: 228–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Mahony, F, Settatree, R, Platt, C, Johanson, R. Review of singleton fetal and neonatal deaths associated with cranial trauma and cephalic delivery during a national intrapartum-related confidential enquiry. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005 May; 112(5): 619–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

,Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical Green Top Guidelines. Instrumental Vaginal Delivery: review. October, 2000.

Main, DM, Main, EK, Moore, DH 2nd. The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction as a continuous effect throughout reproductive life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182(6): 258–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, S, Rusen, ID, Joseph, KS, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004; 26: 735–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ecker, JL, Chen, KT, Cohen, AP, Riley, , Lieberman, ES. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 883–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, H, Agger, AO, Rasmussen, KL. The influence of prepregnancy body mass index on labor complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78(9): 799–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Usha, Kiran TS, Hemmadi, S, Bethel, J, Evans, J. Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 112: 768–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cedergren, MI. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 219–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olde, E, Hart, O, Kleber, RJ, et al. Peri-traumatic dissociation and emotions as predictor of PTSD symptoms following childbirth. J Trauma Dissociation 2005; 6: 125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayers, S, Pickering AD. Do women get posttraumatic stress disorder as a result of childbirth? A prospective study of incidence. Birth 2001; 28: 111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creedy, DK, Shochet, IM, Horsfall, J. Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors. Birth 2000; 27: 104–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Czarnocka, J, Slade, P. Prevalence and predictors of post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth. Br J Clin Psychol 2000; 39: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wijma, K, Soderquist, J, Wijma, B. Posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth: a cross-sectional study. J Anxiety Disord 1997; 11: 587–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Soet, JE, Brack, GA, Dilorio, C. Prevalence and predictors of women's experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth 2003; 30: 36–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lyons, S. A prospective study of post traumatic stress symptoms 1 month following childbirth in a group of 42 first-time mothers. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1998; 16: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimatteo, MR, Morton, S, Lepper, HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychological outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 1996; 15: 348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, N, Paterson-Brown, S. Physical sequelae of cesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15: 883–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ham, MA, Dongen, PW, Mulder, J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section. A retrospective study of intraoperative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section during a ten year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74: 1–6.Google Scholar

Goepfert A for the NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network: The MFMU cesarean registry. Infectious morbidity following primary cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: S192.

Burrows, LJ, Meyn, , Weber, AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 907–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rajasekar, D, Hall, M. Urinary tract injuries during obstetric intervention. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 731–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lydon-Rochelle, M, Holt, VL, Martin, DP, Easterling, DP. Association between mode of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 2000; 283: 2411–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myles, TD, Gooch, J, Santolaya, J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 959.Google ScholarPubMed

,National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean Section: Clinical Guideline. RCOG Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hall, MH, Bewley, S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet 1999; 354: 776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harper, MA, Byington, RP, Espeland, MA, et al. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 273.Google ScholarPubMed

Shellhaas for the NICHD MFMU Network: The MFMU cesarean registry: Cesarean hysterectomy – its indications, morbidities, and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: S123.

Kastner, ES, Figueroa, R, Garry, D, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 971.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Kurinczuk, JJ, Spark, P, Brocklehurst, P; United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System Steering Committee. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111(1): 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, GC, Pell, JP, Dobbie, R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003; 362: 1779–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, R, Gardeil, F, Turner, MJ. Long-term effects of cesarean sections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 176: 254–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwee, A, Bots, ML, Visser, GH, Bruinse, HW. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132(2): 171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwee, A, Bots, ML, Visser, GH, Bruinse, HW. Uterine rupture and its complications in the Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 128(1–2): 257–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwee, A, Bots, ML, Visser, GH, Bruinse, HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. A prospective study in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 187–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guise, JM, McDonagh, MS, Osterwell, P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with a previous cesarean section. BMJ 2004; 329: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDorman, MF, Declercq, E, Menacker, F, Malloy, MH. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with “no indicated risk,” United States, 1998–2001 birth cohorts. Birth 2006; 3: 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fogelson, NS, Menard, MK, Hulsey, T, Ebeling, M. Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: A comment on patient choice cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1433–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levine, EM, Ghai, V, Barton, JJ, Strom, CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 439–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowers, SK. Prevention of iatrogenic respiratory distress syndrome: elective repeat section and spontaneous delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 186–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doherty, EG, Eichenwald, EC. Cesarean delivery: emphasis on the neonate. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47: 332–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laubereau, B, Filipiak-Pittroff, B, Berg, A, et al. Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child 2004; 89(11): 993–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seeman, P, Weinshenker, D, Quirion, R, et al. Dopamine supersensitivity correlates with D2High states, implying many paths to psychosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(9): 3513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003. www.hcup.ahrq.gov/.

Ventura, SJ, Martin, JA, Curtin, SC, Mathews, TJ, Park, MM. Births: Final data for 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2000; 48(3): 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed

Henderson, J, McCandlish, R, Kumiega, L, Petrou, S. Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 149–57.Google ScholarPubMed

Murphy, DJ, Stirrat, GM, Heron, J; ALSPAC Study Team. The relationship between Cesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1914–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mollison, J, Porter, M, Campbell, D, Bhattacharya, S. Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 112: 1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wagner, M. Fish can't see water: the need to humanize birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 75: S25–S37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed