Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T11:10:07.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

C. L. Ten
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mill's On Liberty
A Critical Guide
, pp. 228 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Ethics of Identity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. “Identity, Authenticity, Survival: Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction,” in Gutmann, Amy, ed., Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 149–67.Google Scholar
Archard, David. The Ethics of Identity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Archard, David. “Freedom Not to Be Free: The Case of the Slavery Contract in J. S. Mill's On Liberty,” Philosophical Quarterly, 40 (1990), 453–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J.Joel Feinberg and the Justification of Hard Paternalism,” Legal Theory, 11 (2005), 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J.Mill versus Paternalism,” Ethics, 90 (1980), 470–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Bruce. Rereading Power and Freedom in J. S. Mill (Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom. “Paternalism and Bio-Behavioral Control,” The Monist, 60 (1976), 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, David. “Why It is Better Never to Come into Existence,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 34.3 (1997), 345–55.Google Scholar
Benatar, David. “Why It is Better Never to Come into Existence,” in Benatar, David, ed., Life, Death and Meaning (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), 155–68.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I.A Theory of Freedom(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Constitutional Code, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. ix, ed. Bowring, J. (New York: Russell & Russell, 1962).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Plan for Parliamentary Reform, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. iii, ed. Bowring, J. (New York: Russell & Russell, 1962).Google Scholar
Berger, Fred. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Bird, Colin. An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, James, and Daniel, Farrell. “Freedom and Happiness in Mill's Defence of Liberty,” Philosophical Quarterly, 28 (1978), 325–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boklage, C.Survival Probability of Human Conceptions from Fertilization to Term,” International Journal of Fertility, 35 (1990), 75–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Bosanquet, Bernard. “The Philosophical Theory of the State,” in Bernard Bosanquet, The Philosophical Theory of the State and Related Essays, ed. Gaus, Gerald F. and Street, William (Indianapolis: St. Augustine Press, 2001), 1–293.Google Scholar
Brink, David. “Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy,” in Zalta, Edward N., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007).
Brink, David. “Millian Principles, Freedom of Expression, and Hate Speech,” Legal Theory, 7 (2001), 119–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brison, S. J.The Autonomy Defence of Free Speech,” Ethics, 108 (1998), 312–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Dan. “Paternalism and Autonomy,” Ethics, 98 (1988), 550–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. G.Mill on Liberty and Morality,” Philosophical Review, 81 (1972), 133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. “Social Moral Epistemology,” Social Philosophy & Policy, 19.2 (2002), 126–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, Allen, et al., From Chance to Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Burley, Justine. “Exactly the Same but Different,” Nature, 417 (2002), 224–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, Justine. “Morality and the New Genetics,” in Burley, Justine, ed., Ronald Dworkin and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), 170–92.Google Scholar
Burley, Justine, and John, Harris. “Human Cloning and Child Welfare,” Journal of Medical Ethics, 25 (1999), 108–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callan, Eamonn. “Political Liberalism and Political Education,” Review of Politics, 58.1 (1996), 5–33.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon. “Consequentialist Defenses of Liberal Neutrality,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 41 (1991), 457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Matthew. “Individual Autonomy and Genetic Choice,” in Burley, Justine and Harris, John, eds., A Companion to Genethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), 191–205.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. Mill and Utilitarianism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1997).Google Scholar
“Database of Global Policies on Human Cloning and Germ-Line Engineering,” available at www.glphr.org/genetic/genetic.htm.
Davis, Gordon, and Blain, Neufeld. “Political Liberalism, Civic Education, and Educational Choice,” Social Theory and Practice, 33.1 (2007), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, Patrick. The Enforcement of Morals (London: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “Is Cultural Membership a Good? Kymlica and Ignatieff on the Virtues and Perils of Belonging,” in Aiken, William and Haldane, John, eds., Philosophy and Its Public Role: Essays in Ethics, Politics, Society and Culture, St. Andrews Studies in Philosophy and Public Affairs (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2004), 84–101.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill on Education and Democracy,” in Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds., J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Re-Assessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 250–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill's Liberal Feminism,” Philosophical Studies, 69 (1993), 155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “Mill's Theory of Value,” in West, Henry, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 117–83.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “Mill's Utilitarianism,” in Skorupski, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 255–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Wendy, and Richard, Fumerton. Mill (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. “Is More Choice Better than Less?,” in Dworkin, Gerald, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. “Moral Paternalism,” Law and Philosophy, 24 (2005), 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. “Paternalism,” The Monist, 56 (1972), 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Ronald Dworkin Replies,” in Burley, Justine, ed., Dworkin and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), 362–6.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Sovereign Virtue Revisited,” Ethics, 113 (2002), 106–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “John Stuart Mill and the Harm of Pornography,” Ethics, 102 (1992), 534–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. “The Child's Right to an Open Future,” in Howie, J., ed., Ethical Principles and Social Policy (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983), 97–122.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. “Legal Paternalism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1 (1971), 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, 4 vols. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984–90).Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Friedman, Marilyn. “Feminism and Modern Friendship: Dislocating the Community,” in Avineri, Shlomo and de-Shalit, Avner, eds., Communitarianism and Individualism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 101–19.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Alan E.Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 4 (2001), 231–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Alan E. “Mill's Theory of Morally Correct Action,” in West, Henry, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 139–58.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F.Justificatory Liberalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. “Liberal Neutrality: A Radical and Compelling Principle,” in Klosko, George and Wall, Steven, eds., Perfectionism and Neutrality (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 137–65.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F.Modern Liberal Theory of Man (London: Croom-Helm, 1983).Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. “The Moral Necessity of Liberal Neutrality,” in Christiano, Thomas and Christman, John, eds., Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, forthcoming).
Gaus, Gerald F.Political Theory and Political Concepts (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2000).Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F.Social Philosophy (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1999).Google Scholar
George, Robert P.Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Glover, Jonathan. Choosing Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. “John S. Mill, Traditional and Revisionist Interpretations,” Literature of Liberty, 2 (1979), 7–37.Google Scholar
Gray, John. Mill's On Liberty: A Defence (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. Two Faces of Liberalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie. “Internal Minorities and Their Rights,” in Kymlicka, Will, ed., The Rights of Minority Cultures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 257–72.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. “Lecture on ‘Liberal Legislation’ and Freedom of Contract,” in Harris, Paul and Morrow, John, eds., Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 194–212.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. “Civic Education and Social Diversity,” Ethics, 105.3 (1995), 557–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John. “Clones, Genes, and Human Rights,” in Burley, Justine, ed., The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 61–94.Google Scholar
Harris, John. On Cloning (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2004).Google Scholar
Harris, John. “Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children,” Bioethics, 15 (2001), 413–26.Google Scholar
Harris, John, and Savulescu, Julian. “The Creation Lottery: Final Lessons from Natural Reproduction: Why Those Who Accept Natural Reproduction Should Accept Cloning and Other Frankenstein Reproductive Technologies,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13 (2004), 90–5.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.Law, Liberty and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press; Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Hodson, John D.The Principle of Paternalism,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 14 (1977), 61–9.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Eva. The Secret (London: Secker & Warburg, 2001).Google Scholar
Holm, Søren. “A Life in the Shadow: One Reason Why We Should Not Clone Humans,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 7.2 (1998), 160–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. “Indirect Perfectionism: Kymlicka on Liberal Neutrality,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 3 (1995), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “Legal Paternalism,” in LaFollette, Hugh, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 387–412.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Daniel. “Mill on Liberty, Speech, and the Free Society,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29 (2000), 276–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenisch, Rudolf. “Human Cloning – The Science and Ethics of Nuclear Transplantation,” New England Journal of Medicine, 351.27 (2004), 2787–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javitt, Gail H., Kristen, Suthers, and Kathy, Hudson. “Cloning: A Policy Analysis,” Genetics and Public Policy Center (rev. June 2006), available at www.DNApolicy.org.
Kass, Leon. “The Wisdom of Repugnance,” The New Republic, June 2, 1997, 17–26.Google Scholar
Kleinig, John. Paternalism (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984).Google Scholar
Kubler-Ross, Elisabeth. The Wheel of Life: A Memoir of Living and Dying (New York: Scribner, 1997).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990; 2nd edn. 2002).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality,” Ethics, 99.3 (1989), 833–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Liberalism, Community, and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. Patterns of Moral Complexity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. “Political Liberalism,” in Larmore, Charles, The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leridon, H.Human Fertility: The Basic Components (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government (1690), ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1980).Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “Liberty and Harm to Others,” reprinted in Lyons, Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 89–108.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Macleod, Colin. “Agency, Goodness, and Endorsement: Why We Can't Be Forced to Flourish,” Imprints, 7 (2003), 131–60.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, ed. Lapham, L. H. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Malm, Heidi. “Feinberg's Anti-paternalism and the Balancing Strategy,” Legal Theory, 11 (2005), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, James. “Essay on Government” (1824), in Lively, Jack and Rees, John, eds., Utilitarian Logic and Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), 53–95.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Auguste Comte and Positivism (1865), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, gen. ed. Robson, John M., vol. x: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969), 261–368.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Autobiography (1873), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. i: Autobiography and Literary Essays, ed. Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack, introduction by Robbins, Lord (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), 1–290.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 33 vols., gen. ed. Robson, John M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963–91).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Considerations on Representative Government (1861), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xix: Essays on Politics and Society, Part II, ed. Robson, John M., introduction by Brady, Alexander (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977), 371–577.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill (1849–1873), vols. xiv–xviiof The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Mineka, Francis E. and Lindley, Dwight N. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Nature (1874), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. x: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society, ed. Robson, John M., introduction by Priestley, F. E. L. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985), 373–402.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (1859), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xviii: Essays on Politics and Society, Part I, ed. Robson, John M., introduction by Brady, Alexander (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977), 213–310.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, Part II (1848), vol. iii of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M., introduction by Bladen, V. W. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, “Sedgwick's Discourse” (1835), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. x: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, ed. Robson, John M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969), 31–74.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, The Subjection of Women (1869), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xxi: Essays on Equality, Law, and Education, ed. Robson, John M., introduction by Collini, Stefan (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), 259–340.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive (1843; 8th edn. 1871), vols. vii–viii of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M., introduction by McRae, R. F. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism (1861), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. x: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, ed. Robson, John M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969), 203–59.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, “Theism” (1874), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. x: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, ed. Robson, John M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969), 429–89.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie. “Incompetence and Paternalism,” Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 60 (1974), 465–86.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. “Rawls and Liberalism,” in Freeman, Samuel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 62–85.Google Scholar
Narveson, Jan. The Libertarian Idea (Calgary: Broadview Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C.Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Little C,” in Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sunstein, C. R., eds., Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning (New York: Norton, 1998), 338–46.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. “Whose Traditions? Which Understandings?,” in Okin, Susan Moller, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), 41–73.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K. C.John Stuart Mill and Freedom of Expression: The Genesis of a Theory (London: Routledge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffer, Rodney. Marxism, Morality, and Social Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Pendlebury, Michael. “In Defense of Moderate Neutralism,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 33.3 (2002), 360–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus,” in Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 473–96.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 573–615.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness, ed. Kelly, Erin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971; rev. edn. 1999).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. “Introduction” to Mill, John Stuart, Principles of Political Economy, and Chapters on Socialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), vii–xlvii.Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. Mill on Liberty (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. “Mill: On Liberty,” in Shand, J., ed., Central Works of Philosophy (Chesham: Acumen, 2005), vol. iii, 127–57.Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. “Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression,” Utilitas, 17 (2005), 147–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. “Mill's Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy,” in Urbinati, N., and Zakaras, A., eds., J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. Mill's Radical Liberalism (London: Routledge, forthcoming).
Riley, Jonathan. “Utilitarian Liberalism: Between Gray and Mill,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9 (2006), 117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. Children of Choice: Freedom and the Reproductive Technologies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L.Another Liberalism: Romanticism and the Reconstruction of Liberal Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “The Social Contract” (1762), in The Basic Political Writings, tr. Cress, Donald A. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1987), 139–227.Google Scholar
Rudisill, John Patrick. “The Neutrality of the State and its Justification in Rawls and Mill,” Auslegung, 23 (2000), 153–68.Google Scholar
Sartorius, Rolf E.Individual Contact and Social Norms (Encina and Belmont, CA: Dickenson, 1975).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M.A Theory of Freedom of Expression,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1 (1972), 204–26.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Pedro. The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1972).Google Scholar
Scoccia, Danny. “Paternalism and Respect for Autonomy,” Ethics, 100 (1990), 318–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. “Two Confusions, and Counting,” The Globe and Mail, August 23, 2006,Google Scholar
Sher, George. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine. “Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29 (2000), 205–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine. “Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm,” Legal Theory, 5 (1999), 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “The Idea of Negative Liberty,” in Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Quentin, eds., Philosophy of History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “The Paradoxes of Political Liberty,” in Miller, David, ed., Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 183–205.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John, Why Read Mill Today? (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M.Private Language, Public Laws: The Central Role of Legislative Intent in Statutory Interpretation,” Georgetown Law Journal, 93.2 (2005), 427–85.Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel. An Essay on Rights (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (1874), ed. White, R. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Strum, P.When the Nazis Came to Skokie: Freedom for Speech We Hate (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999).Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W.The Hateful and the Obscene: Studies in the Limits of Free Expression (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “Atomism,” in Avineri, Shlomo and de-Shalit, Avner, eds., Communitarianism and Individualism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 29–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “The Politics of Recognition,” in Gutmann, Amy, ed., Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 25–73.Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert. S.Rawls's Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31.3 (2003), 246–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten, C. L.Mill on Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Ten, C. L.Was Mill a Liberal? (Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic, 2004).Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. “Walden; or, Life in the Woods” (1854), in Sayre, Robert F., ed., A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers; Walden, or, Life in the Woods; The Maine Woods; Cape Cod (New York: Library of America, 1985), 321–587.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, and Zakaras, Alex. J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. Republicanism, tr. Shugaar, Antony (New York: Hill & Wang, 2002).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Cultural Responsibility and Civic Responsibility,” in Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne, eds., Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Legislation and Moral Neutrality,” in Waldron, Jeremy, Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 149–67.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Mill on the Contagious Diseases Acts,” in Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds., J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “One Law for All: The Logic of Cultural Accommodation,” Washington and Lee Law Review, 59 (2003), 3–34.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “Mill's ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’ – A Commentary,” in Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds., J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Henry, ed. The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005).
Wilkinson, T. M.Against Dworkin's Endorsement Constraint,” Utilitas, 15 (2003), 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, T. M.Dworkin on Paternalism and Well-Being,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16 (1996), 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmut, Ian. “The Age of Biological Control,” in Burley, Justine, ed., The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 19–28.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. Message to Congress, 63rd Congress, 2nd Session, Senate Doc. No. 566 (Washington, 1914).Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul. The Poverty of Liberalism (Boston: Beacon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Young, Robert. “Autonomy and Paternalism,” in Patten, Steven C., ed., New Essays in Ethics and Public Policy, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, sup. vol. 8 (1982), 47–66.
Young, Robert. Personal Autonomy: Beyond Negative and Positive Liberty (London: Croom-Helm, 1986).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by C. L. Ten, National University of Singapore
  • Book: Mill's <I>On Liberty</I>
  • Online publication: 01 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575181.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by C. L. Ten, National University of Singapore
  • Book: Mill's <I>On Liberty</I>
  • Online publication: 01 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575181.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by C. L. Ten, National University of Singapore
  • Book: Mill's <I>On Liberty</I>
  • Online publication: 01 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575181.012
Available formats
×