Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T08:25:22.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Visual preferences in urban street scenes: a cross-cultural comparison between Japan and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Jack L. Nasar
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

While some visual preferences in the environment may be influenced by culture, others – universals – may be common to many cultures. Environmental psychologists have examined the relationship between visual aspects of the physical environment and affect (for a review, see Wohlwill, 1976). Acknowledging individual variation in response, some researchers have sought with some success to define general principles that guide preference. However, much of the research has centered on North American and Western European populations. Although these populations are diverse, their common background (as Westerners) may have influenced their preferences. Cross–cultural comparisons with other populations (Canter and Thorne, 1972; Sonnenfeld, 1969) have provided and can provide further insight into the nature of environmental preference. This research represents one such comparison – between Japan and the United States. The aim was to uncover those preferences common to persons in both of these complex and industrialized cultures.

While sharing a status as developed and industrialized nations, Japan and the United States have distinct differences in their cultures and physical environments (Canter and Canter, 1971; Hall, 1966, pp. 49–54; Rapoport, 1977, p. 43). If, despite these differences, common patterns of preference in relation to the visual environment are found among persons from these two nations, then such preferences might be interpreted as representing universals.

In this research, several characteristics of the visual environment were selected as most likely to relate to preferences for urban scenes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Aesthetics
Theory, Research, and Application
, pp. 260 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×