Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Terminal Date of Caesar's Gallic Proconsulate
- I TUDOR POLITICS
- 2 Renaissance Monarchy?
- 3 Henry VII: Rapacity and Remorse
- 4 Henry VII: a Restatement
- 5 The King of Hearts
- 6 Cardinal Wolsey
- 7 Thomas More, Councillor
- 8 Sir Thomas More and the Opposition to Henry VIII
- 9 King or Minister? The Man behind the Henrician Reformation
- 10 Thomas Cromwell's Decline and Fall
- 11 The Good Duke
- 12 Queen Elizabeth
- II TUDOR GOVERNMENT
- General Index
- Index of Authors Cited
3 - Henry VII: Rapacity and Remorse
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Terminal Date of Caesar's Gallic Proconsulate
- I TUDOR POLITICS
- 2 Renaissance Monarchy?
- 3 Henry VII: Rapacity and Remorse
- 4 Henry VII: a Restatement
- 5 The King of Hearts
- 6 Cardinal Wolsey
- 7 Thomas More, Councillor
- 8 Sir Thomas More and the Opposition to Henry VIII
- 9 King or Minister? The Man behind the Henrician Reformation
- 10 Thomas Cromwell's Decline and Fall
- 11 The Good Duke
- 12 Queen Elizabeth
- II TUDOR GOVERNMENT
- General Index
- Index of Authors Cited
Summary
In my England under the Tudors I took the liberty of advancing the view that Henry VII's reputation for rapacity and extortion is probably not borne out by the facts and that his policy did not turn from just to unjust exactions. Though I knew, of course, that this opinion contradicted one held by many since Henry VII's own time I did not imagine it to be provocative; I thought that the work of such scholars as Professors Thorne and Richardson, Miss Brodie and Mr Somerville, had shown the old notions to be quite as mistaken as I maintained. However, I have since discovered that I was too simple in that assumption; in particular, I have been challenged to say how I would dispose of the well-attested facts that Henry VII deteriorated in the second half of his reign into a grasping miser and that he showed deep remorse in his last weeks. The short answer is that I do not regard the first fact as attested at all and cannot believe that remorse in the face of death should be interpreted so trustingly. But, since the issue still appears to be in doubt, I should like to rehearse it here rather more thoroughly. I believe that this historical revision results from an important change in historical method which involves both a more critical attitude to the sources and a better understanding of that age in its own terms.
The consensus of opinion on the earlier view is impressive enough.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and GovernmentPapers and Reviews 1946–1972, pp. 45 - 65Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1974
- 2
- Cited by