Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Modes of context
- 3 Context as changing meaning
- 4 Contextual indicators
- 5 Rational actor and diffusion models
- 6 Barrier models of context
- 7 Oil nationalization, 1918–1980 (with Nathan Adams)
- 8 Eastern Europe, 1945–1989 (with Jon Solem)
- 9 Historical contexts
- 10 Enduring rivalries, or plus ça change …
- 11 The context of international norms
- 12 The norm of decolonization
- 13 Postface: interacting contexts and explaining contexts
- References
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
9 - Historical contexts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Modes of context
- 3 Context as changing meaning
- 4 Contextual indicators
- 5 Rational actor and diffusion models
- 6 Barrier models of context
- 7 Oil nationalization, 1918–1980 (with Nathan Adams)
- 8 Eastern Europe, 1945–1989 (with Jon Solem)
- 9 Historical contexts
- 10 Enduring rivalries, or plus ça change …
- 11 The context of international norms
- 12 The norm of decolonization
- 13 Postface: interacting contexts and explaining contexts
- References
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Summary
A world optimally adapted to current environments is a world without history, and a world without history might have been created as we find it. History matters; it confounds perfection and proves that current life transformed its own past.
Stephen Jay Gould (1985, p. 54)Introduction
The war diffusion model stressed the spatio-temporal environment within which states operate. It proposed that historical and current environments are crucial to understanding international war. The last three chapters explored one kind of situation where the current environment plays a central role in explaining behavior. States learned from what was happening to their neighbors, and their neighbors put pressure on them to conform. The spatial emphasis of the war diffusion framework found strong support in barrier models. This chapter and the next examine the second focus of the diffusion framework, the relation of the past to the present. How does what individuals or dyads do in the past influence what they will do in the future? Evidence for the spatial dependence of war and other phenomena exists. Does it exist for temporal dependence too? Or, are wars temporally “independent” events as many studies imply?
A more general way to pose the temporal dependence question is to ask about the relevance of history for explaining events. History has already appeared as an important context in this volume. The historical context was crucial in defining a valid military allocation indicator; the definition of overallocation depended on the historical period.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contexts of International Politics , pp. 171 - 195Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994