Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:44:06.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Eye movement in Chinese reading: basic processes and crosslinguistic differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gary Feng
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Psychology, Duke University
Ping Li
Affiliation:
University of Richmond, Virginia
Li Hai Tan
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Elizabeth Bates
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Ovid J. L. Tzeng
Affiliation:
Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Get access

Summary

As the eyes travel through lines, they proceed with a series of jumps (saccades) and stops (fixations). These fixations and saccades reflect the underlying perceptual, cognitive, and linguistic processes during reading (Rayner, 1998). Eye movements in Chinese reading are particularly interesting because of the unique features of the Chinese language and orthography, many of which are discussed in other chapters of this handbook. The present chapter focuses on how these orthography-specific characteristics affect eye movements in Chinese reading eye movement programming.

A brief history

The first published study of Chinese eye movement dates back to 1925 (Miles & Shen, 1925), almost a half century after the discovery of reading eye movements (Javel, 1878). Several studies were conducted in the following decade on topics related to the Chinese language reform movement at the time, which, among many things, promoted horizontal rather than vertical text arrangement, vernacular as opposed to classical writing styles, and silent reading over oral reading (Hu, 1928; Miles & Shen, 1925; Shen 1925; Wang, 1935). For example, Chinese was written primarily in the top-down writing direction. There were various speculations that vertical reading was inefficient because of physiological constraints, such as the shape of our eyes or the way two eyes are positioned (see Hoosain, 1991 and Miles & Shen, 1925). The first studies on Chinese reading eye movement disputed the popular misconception. Shen and colleagues demonstrated that vertical reading was slightly faster than horizontal reading (Miles & Shen, 1925; Shen, 1926, 1927).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×