Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:17:58.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Molecular genetic variation and selection on genotype

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

J. M. Pemberton
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
D. W. Coltman
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
D. R. Bancroft
Affiliation:
GPC AG Genome Pharmaceutical Corporation, Munich, Germany
J. A. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
S. Paterson
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
T. H. Clutton-Brock
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
J. M. Pemberton
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The application of molecular techniques to population biology can be traced back to the origins of allozyme gel electrophoresis (Smithies 1955) and the invention of histochemical stains targeting specific enzymes (Hunter and Markert 1957). Initial surprise at the high level of variation revealed was rationalised by the understanding that much molecular variation must be selectively neutral (Kimura 1968; King and Jukes 1969), and making this assumption, molecular markers were applied to samples of anonymous individuals to quantify population-level processes such as inbreeding, differentiation and phylogeography (Avise 1994).

Alongside these population genetics studies, there was a series of detailed studies in which phenotypic and spatial data about the individuals sampled was also collected, and the enzyme kinetic properties of alleles were quantified, allowing tests of selective neutrality at specific allozyme loci. Examples of allozyme polymorphisms that appear to be under selection include phosphoglucomutase in Colias butterflies (Watt et al. 1983), leucine aminopeptidase in the mussel Mytilus edulis (Koehn and Hillbish 1987) and lactate dehydrogenase-B in the marine killifish Fundulus heteroclitus (Powers et al. 1983). Similarly, several studies demonstrated correlations between average allozyme heterozygosity and phenotypic measures, which might be due to overdominance (heterozygote advantage) at specific loci or inbreeding depression (Allendorf and Leary 1986; Ledig 1986; Mitton 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Soay Sheep
Dynamics and Selection in an Island Population
, pp. 217 - 242
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×