Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:44:53.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Major Ion Geochemistry and Drinking Water Supply Issues in the Hudson River Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

H. James Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
Steven N. Chillrud
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
Richard F. Bopp
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Edward Shuster
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Damon A. Chaky
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
Jeffrey S. Levinton
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access

Summary

abstract This chapter uses data from a few representative sampling sites in the Hudson basin to understand variations in major ion concentrations, which are used as one simple proxy of gross drinking water quality. Other water supply issues, including potential implications of dissolved organic carbon concentrations on drinking water quality, are also discussed. The major ion content of surface waters is largely determined by precipitation chemistry, dry deposition from the atmosphere, chemical weathering of rock and soil minerals, and anthropogenic loadings, and then modified by biogeochemical reactions that take place within the system. (1) Based on data reported for West Point, New York by the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP), precipitation chemistry in the Hudson River basin is similar to that in much of the northeastern United States. As a result of upwind and regional fossil fuel combustion, sulfate and nitrate are the most abundant anions and hydrogen is the most abundant cation (i.e., dilute solutions of sulfuric and nitric acids). Ammonium, chloride, and sodium have lower concentrations, with the latter two derived mostly from marine aerosols. Chloride appears to have an additional, nonmarine, source accounting for at least 25 percent of wet deposition of this ion at West Point. (2) Major element chemistry of surface waters in the Hudson River basin strongly reflects bedrock geology of tributary catchments. Adirondack and Catskill Mountain and Hudson Highland streams have low total dissolved solids (TDS) typical of ancient crystalline, metamorphic, or previously weathered coarse silicic sedimentary formations. In contrast, the significantly higher TDS of the Mohawk River reflect drainage from large areas of sedimentary rocks including limestones, carbonate-rich shales, and evaporite minerals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bator, S. J. 1997. Sulfate geochemistry of groundwater: A comparison of the Canajoharie and Clifton Park aquifers, Masters thesis, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Berner, E. K., and Berner, R. A. 1996. Global Environment, Water, Air and Geochemical Cycles, Prentice Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
Bopp, R. F., Deck, B. L., Simpson, H. J., and Warren, S. D. 1990. Chlorinated hydrocarbons and water quality issues in the New York City municipal supply, in Jolley, R. J. et al. (eds.), Water Chlorination: Chemistry, Environmental Impact and Health Effects, Volume 6, Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers, Inc., pp. 61–74Google Scholar
Bopp, R. F., Simpson, H. J., Olsen, C. R., Trier, R. M., and Kostyk, N. 1982. Chlorinated hydrocarbons and radionuclide chronologies in sediments of the Hudson River and estuary, New York. Environmental Science and Technology 16:666–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bopp, R. F., and Simpson, H. J. 1989. Contamination of the Hudson River, the sediment record. In Contaminated Marine Sediments – Assessment and Remediation, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press, pp. 401–416Google Scholar
Chillrud, S. N. 1996. Transport and fate of particle associated contaminants in the Hudson River basin, Ph. D dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY
Clark, J. F., Simpson, H. J., Bopp, R. F., and Deck, B. L. 1992. Geochemistry and loading history of phosphate and silicate in the Hudson Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 34:213–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmer, K. I. 1987. Overview of Hudson River hydrology. Final Report to the Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research, Inc, New York
Drever, J. I., and Zobrist, J. 1993. Chemical weathering of silicate rocks as a function of elevation in the southern Swiss Alps. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56:3209–3216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, S., Pace, M., and Lints, D. 1991. Variability and transport of suspended sediment, particulate and dissolved organic carbon in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Biogeochemistry 12: 149–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D. W., Isachsen, Y. W., and Rickard, L. V. 1971. Geologic Map of New York State: Sheets 1,2,3, Chart No. 15, New York State Geological Survey, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
Garvey, E. A. 1990. The geochemistry of inorganic carbon in the Hudson estuary, Ph. D dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY
Hammond, D. E. 1975. Dissolved gases and kinetic processes in the Hudson River estuary, Ph. D dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY
Junge, C. E. 1963. Air Chemistry and Radioactivity, New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Junge, C. E. and Werby, R. T. 1958. The concentration of chloride, sodium, potassium, calcium and sulfate in rainwater over the United States. Journal of Meteorology 15:417–4252.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Hedin, L. O., Driscoll, C. T., and Eaton, J. E. 1990. Dry deposition of sulfur: a 23 year record for the Hubbard Brook Forest ecosystem. Tellus 42B:319–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meybeck, M. 1979. Concentrations des eaus fluviales in elements majeurs et apports en solution aux ocean, Revue de Geologie Dynamique et de Geographie Physique 21(3): 215–46Google Scholar
Meybeck, M. 1987. Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from river dissolved loads. American Journal of Science 287:401–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, C. R. 1979. Radionuclides, sedimentation and the accumulation of pollutants in the Hudson estuary, Ph. D dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY
Olsen, C. R., Cutshall, N. H., Larsen, I. L., Simpson, H. J., Trier, R. M., and Bopp, R. F. 1984–85. An estuarine fine-particle budget determined from radionuclide tracers. Geo-Marine Letters 4: 157–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. J. 1994. Chloride concentrations as indicators of point source sewage discharges in the Hudson River Basin, New York (abstract). EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 1994 Fall Meeting Supplement 75 (44): 229Google Scholar
Phillips, P. J., and Hanchar, D. W. 1996. Water-quality assessment of the Hudson River Basin in New York and adjacent states – Analysis of nutrient, pesticide, volatile organic compound, and suspended sediment data, 1970–1990, USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 96–4065
Randall, A. D. 1996. Mean annual runoff, precipitation and evapotranspiration in the glaciated northeastern United States, 1951–80, USGS Open-File Report 96–395
Simpson, H. J., Bopp, R. F., and Deck., B. L. 1981 (July). Evaluation of the potential impacts of the proposed Prattsville pumped-storage project on drinking water quality in New York City, Report to Department of Environmental Protection, City of New York
Sisterson, D. L., Bowersox, V. C., Olsen, A. R., and Simpson, J. C. 1991. Wet deposition of atmospheric pollutants, 6–41 to 6–78. In Irving, P. M. (ed.), Acidic Deposition: State of Science and Technology, Volume 1, Emissions, Atmospheric Processes and Deposition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. National Acid Precipitation Assessment ProgramGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×