Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:24:23.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - The law relating to confidentiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Sue Eckstein
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Obligation to protect confidentiality

Those involved in clinical research owe an ethical and legal obligation to respect the confidences of research subjects. The obligation extends to all personal information, medical and other, given to or observed by the researcher in circumstances where the research subject expects it not to be disclosed. This expectation need not be explicitly stated but may be assumed from the context, e.g. it is always assumed in a physician–patient relationship, regardless of the existence of a contract between the physician and the patient. Health care professionals who disclose confidential information may be subject to disciplinary action by their professional body (e.g. the GMC or UKCC) and all researchers, whether health care professionals or not, may also be subject to legal action. Medical confidentiality is protected as part of the right to private life under Article 8(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (Z v Finland [1997]), and consequently also under the Human Rights Act 1998.

Disclosure of information which does not reveal the identity of a research subject, e.g. epidemiological or aggregated data, is not a breach of the obligation of confidence. This is even true where anonymised patient information is sold for research purposes without the patient's consent (R v Department of Health, ex parte Source Informatics Ltd [1999]).

Exemptions from the duty of confidentiality

There are a number of exceptions to the obligation of confidentiality which may justify disclosure.

The original version of this article was written by Andrew Grubb and Ian Kennedy in 1994. The article was revised and updated by Sabine Michalowski of the Department of Law, University of Essex in 2001, who takes responsibility for its current accuracy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual for Research Ethics Committees
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London
, pp. 100 - 102
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×