Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:19:11.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - The proximal carotid arteries – image-based computational modelling

from Plaque modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Yun Xu
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
N. B. Wood
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Jonathan Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Graves
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Thomas Hatsukami
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Chun Yuan
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The carotid bifurcation is a site of particular interest for arterial disease studies, since it is a focal site where atherosclerosis is common, particularly affecting the carotid sinus, at the origin of the internal carotids. Moreover, as the atherosclerotic plaque forms, it may become vulnerable to rupture, releasing emboli and promoting the formation of thrombus more distally, leading to stroke.

The long-standing hypothesis that hemodynamic forces correlate with the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis has been the driver for numerous computational and experimental studies of the carotid arteries over the years. Research on the combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) began almost a decade ago, leading to subsequent publications on studies of large artery hemodynamics under physiologically realistic anatomical and flow conditions (Milner et al., 1998; Taylor et al., 1999; Long et al., 2000a, b; Wood et al., 2001). The use of conventional and 3D ultrasound imaging to acquire in vivo geometrical information for CFD analysis has not been widely adopted although some attempts have been made (Gill et al., 2000; Augst et al., 2003; Barratt et al., 2004; Glor et al., 2005). Computerised tomography (CT) imaging has also been used for reconstruction of subject-specific models of coronary stenoses and abdominal aortic aneurysms (Raghavan et al., 2000; Achenbach et al., 2001; Leung et al., 2005), but this technique is limited by the associated ionizing radiation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Carotid Disease
The Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management
, pp. 313 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, S., Giesler, T., Ropers, D., et al. (2001). Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation, 103, 2535–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antiga, L. and Steinman, D. A. (2004). Robust and objective decomposition and mapping of bifurcating vessels. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23, 704–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariff, B., Stanton, A., Barratt, D. C., et al. (2002). Comparison of the effects of antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin II blockade and beta-blockade on carotid wall structure and haemodynamics: protocol and baseline demographics. Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, 3, 116–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Augst, A. (2003). Haemodynamics in human carotid artery bifurcations: A combined CFD and 3D ultrasound study [PhD]. Imperial College London, University of London.
Barratt, D. C., Davies, A. H., Hughes, A. D., Thom, S. A. and Humphries, K. N. (2001). Optimisation and evaluation of an electromagnetic tracking device for high accuracy three-dimensional imaging of the carotid arteries. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 27, 957–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barratt, D. C., Ariff, B. B., Humphries, K. N., et al. (2004). Reconstruction and quantification of the carotid artery bifurcation from 3-D ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging, 23, 567–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bathe, M. and Kamm, R. D. (1999). A fluid-structure interaction finite element analysis of pulsatile blood flow through a compliant stenotic artery. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 121, 361–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluestein, D., Niu, L., Schoephoerster, R. T. and Dewanjee, M. K. (1997). Fluid mechanics of arterial stenosis: relationship to the development of mural thrombus. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 25, 344–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caro, C. G., FitzGerald, J. M. and Schroter, R. C. (1969). Arterial wall shear and early atheroma in man. Nature, 223, 1159–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dai, G., Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R., Natarajan, S., et al. (2004). Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis-susceptible and -resistant regions of human vasculature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 14871–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. F. (1995). Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiological Reviews, 75, 519–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. F., Polacek, D. C., Handen, J. S., Helmke, B. P. and DePaola, N. (1999). A spatial approach to transcriptional profiling: mechanotransduction and the focal origin of atherosclerosis. Trends in Biotechnology, 17, 347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBakey, M. E., Lawrie, G. M. and Glaeser, D. H. (1985). Patterns of atherosclerosis and their surgical significance. Annals of Surgery, 201, 115–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumoulin, C. L. and Hart, H. R. (1986). Magnetic resonance angiography. Radiology, 161, 717–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumoulin, C. L., Souza, S. P. and Hart, H. R. (1987). Rapid scan magnetic resonance angiography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 5, 238–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferziger, J. H. and Peric, M. (1996). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. H. and Fry, D. L. (1993). Arterial permeability dynamics and vascular disease. Atherosclerosis, 104, 189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, D. L. (1968). Acute endothelial damage associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circulation Research, 22, 165–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, D. P., Zarins, C. K. and Glagov, S. (1993). The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 115, 588–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, J. D., Ladak, H. M., Steinman, D. A. and Fenster, A. (2000). Accuracy and variability assessment of a semiautomatic technique for segmentation of the carotid arteries from three-dimensional ultrasound images. Medical Physics, 27, 1333–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glor, F. P., Long, Q. and Hughes, A. D. (2003a). Reproducibility study of magnetic resonance image-based computational fluid dynamics prediction of carotid bifurcation flow. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 31, 142–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glor, F. P., Ariff, B., Crowe, L., et al. (2003b). Carotid geometry reconstruction: a comparison between Magnetic resonance imaging and Ultrasound. Medical Physics, 30, 3251–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glor, F. P., Ariff, B., Hughes, A. D., et al. (2005). Operator dependence of 3-D ultrasound-based computational fluid dynamics for the carotid bifurcation. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging, 24, 451–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargreaves, B. A., Vasanawala, S. S., Nayak, K. S., Hu, B. S. and Nishimura, G. G. (2003). Fat-suppressed steady-state free precession imaging using phase detection. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 50, 210–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, X. and Ku, D. N. (1996). Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 118, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, C. (1988). Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, D. W., Norley, C. J. D., Frayne, R., Steinman, D. A. and Rutt, B. K. (1999). Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiological Measurement, 20, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzapfel, G., Sommer, G. and Regitnig, P. (2004). Anisotropic mechanical properties of tissue components in human atherosclerotic plaques. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 126, 657–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ji, T. L., Sundareshan, M. K. and Roehrig, H. (1994). Adaptive image contrast enhancement based on human visual properties. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging, 13, 573–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kass, M., Witkin, A. and Terzopoulos, D. (1988). Snake: active contour models. International Journal of Computerized Vision, 1, 321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, D. N., Giddens, D. P., Zarins, C. Z. and Glagov, S. (1985). Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Arteriosclerosis, 5, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, K. W. and Xu, X. Y. (2002). Modelling of flow and wall behaviour in a mildly stenosed tube. Medical Engineering and Physics, 24, 575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. W., Wood, N. B. and Xu, X. Y. (2004). Ultrasound image-based computer model of a common carotid artery with a plaque. Medical Engineering and Physics, 26, 823–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levick, J. R. (2003). An Introduction to Cardiovascular Physiology, 4th edn. London, UK: Arnold, pp. 144–6.Google Scholar
Leung, J. H., Wright, A. R., Cheshire, N., et al. (2005). The effect of thrombus on wall stress in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model. In ed. Rodrigues, H., Cerraziola, M., Doblaré, M., Ambrósio, J. and Viceconti, M., Proceedings II of the International Conference of Computational Bioengineering; Sept. 2005, Lisbon, Portugal: IST Press, pp. 413–20.Google Scholar
Long, Q., Xu, X. Y., Collins, M. W., Griffith, T. M. and Bourne, M. (1998). The combination of magnetic resonance angiography and computational fluid dynamics: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 26, 227–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, Q., Xu, X. Y., Ariff, B., et al. (2000a). Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and Magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 11, 299–311.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Q., Xu, X. Y., Bourne, M. and Griffith, T. M. (2000b). Numerical study of blood flow in an anatomically realistic aorto-iliac bifurcation generated from Magnetic resonance imaging data. Magnetic Resonance Medicine, 43, 565–76.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, P., Li, X. and Ku, D. N. (1997). Convective mass transfer at the human carotid bifurcation. Journal of Biomechanics, 30, 565–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malek, A. M., Alper, S. L. and Izumo, S. (1999). Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 2035–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayet, J., Stanton, A. V., Sinclair, A.-M., et al. (1995). The effects of antihypertensive therapy on carotid vascular structure in man. Cardiovascular Research, 30, 147–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, J. S., Moore, J. A., Rutt, B. K. and Steinman, D. A. (1998). Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: Computational studies in models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 28, 143–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, R., Simmons, S. P. and Udaykumar, H. S. (2001). Application of large-eddy simulation to the study of pulsatile flow in a modeled arterial stenosis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123, 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, W. W. and O'Rourke, M. F. (2005). McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles, 5th edn. London, UK: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Passerini, A. G., Polacek, D. C. and Shi, C.et al. (2004). Coexisting proinflammatory and antioxidative endothelial transcription profiles in a disturbed flow region of the adult porcine aorta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 2482–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, M. L., Vorp, D. A., Federle, M. P., Makaroun, M. S. and Webster, M. W. (2000). Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 31, 760–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rappitsch, G. and Perktold, K. (1996). Pulsatile albumin transport in large arteries: a numerical study. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 118, 511–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, N. and Gimbrone, M. A. (1995). Hemodynamic forces are complex regulators of endothelial gene expression. Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 9, 874–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, P. D., Davies, M. J. and Born, G. V. (1989). Influence of plaque configuration and stress distribution on fissuring of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet, 2, 941–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, P. D. (2002). Biomechanics of plaque rupture: Progress, problems and new frontiers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 30, 524–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlichting, H. (1979). Boundary Layer Theory, 7th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stangeby, D. K. and Ethier, C. R. (2002). Computational analysis of coupled blood-wall arterial LDL transport. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 124, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanton, A. V., Chapman, J. N., Mayet, J., et al. (2001). Effects of blood pressure lowering with amlodipine or lisinopril on vascular structure of the common carotid artery. Clinical Science (Lond.), 101, 455–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinman, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Ladak, H. M., et al. (2002). Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and Magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47, 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, D. L., Yang, C., Kobayashi, S. and Ku, D. N. (2001). Steady flow and wall compression in stenotic arteries: A three-dimensional thick-wall model with fluid-wall interactions. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123, 548–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarbell, J. M. (2003). Mass transport in arteries and the localization of atherosclerosis. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 5, 79–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, C. A., Draney, M. T. and Ku, J. P. (1999). Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Computer Aided Surgery, 4, 231–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, J. B., Milner, J. S., Rutt, B. K. and Steinman, D. A. (2003). Reproducibility of image-based computational fluid dynamics models of the human carotid bifurcation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 31, 132–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, N. B. (1999). Aspects of fluid dynamics applied to the larger arteries. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 199, 137–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, N. B., Weston, S. J., Kilner, P. J., Gosman, A. D. and Firmin, D. N. (2001). Combined Magnetic resonance imaging and CFD simulation of flow in the human descending aorta. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 13, 699–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, N. B. and Xu, X. Y. (2003). Turbulence in stenoses: survey and early numerical results. In Recent Advances in Fluid Dynamics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Fluid Mechanics; July 28–31. Dalian, China: © 2003 Tsinghua University Press & Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wood, N. B., Exarchou, I., Xu, X. Y., et al. (2005). Progress with the study of retinal hemodynamics in normotensive and hypertensive patients. In Proceedings of the ASME 2005 Summer Bioengineering Conference; June 2005. Vail CO, UltrasoundA. Abstract 68962.Google Scholar
Wootton, D. M. and Ku, D. N. (1999). Fluid mechanics of vascular systems, diseases, and thrombosis. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 1, 299–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, S. Z., Ariff, B. and Long, Q. (2002). Inter-individual variations in wall shear stress and mechanical stress distributions at the carotid artery bifurcation of healthy humans. Journal of Biomechanics, 35, 1367–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×