Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:29:29.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

97 - Stereotactic procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Michele M. Johnson
Affiliation:
Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Robert E. Gross
Affiliation:
Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Robert B. Smith
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Nathan O. Spell
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
H. Kenneth Walker
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

As in all fields of surgery, the current trend in neurosurgery is towards less invasive procedures and the shorter hospital stays that result from them. Therefore, stereotactic techniques are an indispensable tool for the modern neurosurgeon and have been dramatically improved by the recent revolution in digital image guidance technology. These techniques provide a relatively straightforward, accurate, and safe method to approach intracranial targets that are defined by either anatomical or functional characteristics. Anatomically defined targets include brain tumors and abscesses as well as other structural lesions. Targeting for anatomical disorders relies entirely on patient-specific anatomy derived from radiographs (e.g., ventriculography) or tomograms (e.g., CT, MRI) for localization. Functionally defined structures include the various nuclei of the basal ganglia and thalamus that are targeted for pain and movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia), as well as other conditions. Targeting for functional disorders combines computerized imaging with intraoperative electrophysiological mapping for localization.

Stereotactic brain biopsy – which is purely diagnostic and does not allow for tumor resection – has been used increasingly during the past decade to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial lesions, providing a definitive pathologic diagnosis in more than 90% of the patients with a low associated morbidity. On the day of operation, the patient undergoes a contrast-enhanced imaging study (MRI or CT) following the attachment to the cranium of the stereotactic base ring and localizer under local anesthesia and sedation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
, pp. 682 - 684
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berstein, M. & Parrent, A. G.Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J. Neurosurg. 1994; 81: 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhardwaj, R. D. & Bernstein, M.Prospective feasibility study of outpatient stereotactic brain lesion biopsy. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 358–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hariz, M. I.Complications of deep brain stimulation surgery. Mov. Disord. 2002; 17(3): S162–S166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higuchi, Y. & Iacono, R. P.Surgical complications in patients with Parkinson's disease after posteroventral pallidotomy. Neurosurgery 2003; 52(3): 558–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulkarni, A. V., Guha, V., Lozano, A., & Bernstein, M.Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy. J. Neurosurg. 1998; 89: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terao, T., Takahashi, H., Yokochi, F., Taniguchi, M., Okiyama, R., & Hamada, I.Hemorrhagic complication of stereotactic surgery in patients with movement disorders. J. Neurosurg. 2003; 98: 1241–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umemura, A., Jaggi, J. L., Hurtig, H. I.et al. Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: morbidity and mortality in 109 patients. J. Neurosurg. 2003; 98: 779–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnick, R. E., Longmore, L. M., Paul, C. A., & Bode, L. A.Postoperative management of patients after stereotactic biopsy: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on tumors and a single institution. J. Neuro-oncol. 2003; 62: 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×