Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:30:25.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Action recognition in normal and schizophrenic subjects

from Part III - Disturbances of the self: the case of schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Marc Jeannerod
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Chloe Farrer
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Nicolas Franck
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Pierre Fourneret
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Andres Posada
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Elena Daprati
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Nicolas Georgieff
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
Tilo Kircher
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Anthony David
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The ability to attribute an action to its proper agent and to understand its meaning when it is produced by someone else are basic aspects of human social communication. Several psychiatric symptoms, such as those of schizophrenia, relate to a dysfunction of the awareness of one's own action as well as of recognition of actions performed by others. Such syndromes thus offer a framework for studying the determinants of the sense of agency, which ultimately allows one to attribute correctly actions to their veridical source. This chapter will report a series of experiments in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients dealing with the recognition of actions. The basic paradigm used in these experiments was to present the subject with simple actions which may or may not correspond to those they currently execute. Systematic distortions have been introduced, such that the threshold for accepting an action as one's own could be determined. In normal subjects, this threshold is relatively high, indicating the existence of a specific mode of processing for action signals, independent from visual processing used in other perceptual activities. In schizophrenic patients, this threshold is further increased, with a strong tendency to self-attribute actions which do not correspond to those they have performed. The results reveal a clear distinction between patient groups with and without hallucinations and/or delusions of influence. Influenced patients show a higher rate of self-attributions. These results point to schizophrenia and related disorders as a paradigmatic alteration of a ‘who?’ system for action monitoring and self-consciousness.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, N. C. (1983). The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa
Andreasen, N. C. (1984). The Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa
Andreasen, N. C. (1999). A unitary model of schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 781–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1998). Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 234–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, A. (1855). The Senses and the Intellect. London: Parker
Bernard, D., Lancon, C. & Bougerol, T. (1997). Attention models in evaluating schizophrenia. Encephale, 23, 113–18Google Scholar
Cadenhead, K. S., Geyer, M. A., Butler, R. W. et al. (1997). Information visual processing deficits of schizophrenia patients: relationship to clinical ratings, gender and medication status. Schizophrenia Research, 28, 51–62Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. & Birchwood, M. (1994). The omnipotence of voices. A cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 190–201Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Palafox, G. P., Nakayama, K. et al. (1999). Motion perception in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 149–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daprati, E., Franck, N., Georgieff, N. et al. (1997). Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition, 65, 71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, A. S. (1994). The neuropsychological origin of auditory hallucinations. In The Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia, ed. A. S. David & J. C. Cutting, pp. 269–313. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum
Dierks, T., Linden, D. E. J., Jandl, M. et al. (1999). Activation of the Heschl's gyrus during auditory hallucniations. Neuron, 22, 615–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominey, P. & Georgieff, N. (1997). Schizophrenic learn surface but not abstract structure in a serial reaction time task. Neuroreport, 8, 2877–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchenne de Boulogne (1855). De l'Éléctrisation Localisée et de son application à la Physiologie et à la Médecine. Paris: Baillère
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation. A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–11Google Scholar
Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N. et al. (2002). Confusing the self and the other. Impaired attribution of actions in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin (in press)
Fletcher, P. (1999). Abnormal cingulate modulation of fronto-temporal connectivity in schizophrenia. Neuroimage, 9, 337–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourneret, P. & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133–40Google Scholar
Franck, N., Farrer, C., Georgieff, N. et al. (2001). Defective recognition of one's own actions in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 454–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 357–63Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind reading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 493–501Google Scholar
Georgieff, N. & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Beyond consciousness of external reality: a “who” system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 465–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepnery, B., Mestre, D., Masson, G. & Schonen, S. (1995). Postural effects of motion vision in young autistic children. Neuroreport, 6, 1211–14Google Scholar
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1994). Working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6, 348–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. & Selemon, L. D. (1997). Functional and anatomical aspects of prefrontal pathology in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23, 437–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, L. N. (1949). Auditory hallucinations in subvocal speech: objective study in a case of schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 109, 418–27Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Hemsley, D. R. & Smith, A. D. (1991). The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 1–84Google Scholar
Grèzes, J. & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1–193.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janet, P. (1937). Les troubles de la personnalité sociale. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, II, 149–200
Jeannerod, M. (1990). The representation of the goal of an action and its role in the control of goal-directed movements. In Computational Neuroscience, ed. E. Schwartz, pp. 352–65. Cambridge: MIT Press
Jeannerod, M. (1993). A theory of representation driven actions. In The perceived Self: Ecological and Interpersonal Sources of Self-knowledge, ed. U. Neisser, pp. 89–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain. Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1997). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford: Blackwell
Jeannerod, M. (1999). To act or not to act: perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A52, 1–29Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, S103–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M. & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Currrent Opinions in Neurobiology, 9, 735–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, G. (1977). Studies on visual perception of locomotion. Perception, 6, 365–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koechlin, E., Basso, G., Pietrini, P., Panzer, S. & Grafman, J. (1999). The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature, 399, 148–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. & Heckers, S. (2000). Schizophrenia and cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 205–10Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., McGuire, P. K. & David, A. S. (1998). Reduced sensitivity to linguistic context in schizophrenic thought disorder: evidence from on-line monitoring for words in linguistically anomalous sentences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 8423–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, K. R. (1999). A meta analytic review of Wisconsin card sort studies in schizophrenia: general intellectual deficit in disguise? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 4, 1–35Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1878). Motor feelings and the muscular sense. Brain, 1, 14–28Google Scholar
Manoach, D. S., Press, D. Z., Thangaraj, V. et al. (1999). Schizophrenic participants activate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a working memory task, as measured by fMRI. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 1128–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A. & Frith, C. D. (1996). Functional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring. Brain, 119, 907–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkowski, E. (1927). La Schizophrénie. Psychopathologie des Schizoïdes et des Schizophrènes. Lausanne: Editions Payot & Rivages
Nielsen, T. (1963). Volition: a new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada, A., Franck, N., Georgieff, N. & Jeannerod, M. (2001). Anticipating incoming events: an impaired cognitive process in schizophrenia. Cognition, 81, 209–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhakaran, V., Narayanan, K., Zhao, Z. & Gabrieli, D. E. (2000). Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 85–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Armel, C., Foster, C. & Stoddard, R. (1998). Object recognition can drive motion perception. Nature, 395, 852–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddoch, M. J. & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum
Roth, M., Decety, J., Raybaudi, M. et al. (1996). Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport, 7, 1280–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, K. (1955). Klinische Psychopathologie. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag
Schwartz, B. D., Maron, B. A., Evans, W. J. & Winstead, D. K. (1999). High velocity transient visual processing deficits diminish ability of patients with schizophrenia to recognize objects. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 12, 170–7Google Scholar
Servan-Schreiber, D., Cohen, J. D. & Steingard, S. (1996). Schizophrenic deficits in the processing of context. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1105–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrar, M. & Freyd, J. (1990). Apparent motion in the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbersweig, D. A., Stern, E., Frith, C. et al. (1995). A functional neuroanatomy of hallucinations in schizophrenia. Nature, 378, 176–9Google Scholar
Spence, S. A., Brooks, D. J., Hirsch, S. R. et al. (1997). A PET study of voluntary movements in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain, 120, 1997–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, A. A., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Gore, J. C., Fulbright, R. K. & Wexler, B. E. (1998). Cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia during auditory word and tone working memory demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 1097–103Google Scholar
Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M. & Decety, J. (2000). New aspects of motion perception: selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. NeuroReport, 11, 109–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, D. R. & Berman, K. F. (1996). Prefrontal function in schizophrenia: confounds and controversies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 351, 1495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z. & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakzanis, K. K. & Heinrichs, R. W. (1999). Schizophrenia and the frontal brain: a quantitative review. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 556–66Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×