Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T07:12:15.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MMR vaccine

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Emily Buckley
Affiliation:
Staffordshire University
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

The MMR triple vaccine provides protection from measles, mumps and rubella (German measles). These diseases can have serious complications such as convulsions, temporary or permanent deafness, meningitis, brain damage and even death. However, since the introduction of the MMR vaccine in 1988, these once common diseases have become rare in the Western World.

In the United Kingdom, children are expected to receive two doses of the combined vaccine, the first at 12–15 months of age and the second between three and five years. In 1997/8 MMR vaccination coverage was at its highest level with 91% of all children being vaccinated by their second birthday. However MMR coverage is now at its lowest for over ten years with only 82% of all children being immunized with MMR in 2003, and in some areas such as London, uptake has fallen to only 72%. This is far below the current Government targets which advocate that 95% of all children should be immunized by the age of two in order to maintain herd immunity. In 2002 the UK had the first measles outbreaks for a decade (Office of National Statistics, 2004). Worldwide 890 000 children die as a result of measles each year, mainly in countries with poor immunization coverage (Owens, 2002), and as such, the reasons for falling immunization rates need to be addressed.

Non-immunization has been attributed to a number of factors including parental attitudes to immunization (such as unfamiliarity with diseases) and unsatisfactory provision of services.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agbley, D. & Campbell, H. (1998). Summary of factors affecting immunisation uptake levels. In Hey, V. (Ed.). Immunisation research: a summary volume. London: HEA.
Begg, N., Ramsay, M., White, J. & Bozoky, Z. (1998). Media dents confidence in the MMR vaccine. British Medical Journal, 361, 561.Google Scholar
Bellaby, P. (2003). Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents' attitudes to combined MMR vaccination. British Medical Journal, 327, 725–8.Google Scholar
Bond, L., Nolan, T., Pattison, P. & Carlin, J. (1998). Vaccine preventable diseases and immunisations: a qualitative study of mothers' perceptions of severity, susceptibility, benefits and barriers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 22(4), 441–6.Google Scholar
Bradley, P. (1999). Should childhood immunisation be compulsory?Journal of Medical Ethics, 25, 330–4.Google Scholar
Evans, M., Stoddart, H.et al. (2001). Parent's perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study. British Journal of General Practice, 51, 904–10.Google Scholar
Fombonne, E. & Chakrabarti, S. (2001). No evidence for a new variant of measles-mumps-rubella-induced autism. Pediatrics, 108, 4, E58.Google Scholar
Gill, E. & Sutton, S. (1998). Immunisation uptake: the role of parental attitudes. In Hey, V. (Ed.). Immunisation research: a summary volume. London: HEA.
Jewell, D. (2001). MMR and the age of unreason. Editorial. British Journal of General Practice, 51, 901–3.Google Scholar
Kmietowicz, Z. (2002). Government launches intensive media campaign on MMR. British Medical Journal, 324, 383.Google Scholar
Meldgaard Madsen, K., Hviid, A., Vestergaard, M.et al. (2002). A population-based study of measles, mumps and rubella vaccination and autism. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(19), 1477–82.Google Scholar
New, S. J. & Senior, M. L. (1991). “I don't believe in needles”: qualitative aspects of a study into the uptake of infant immunisation in two English health authorities. Social Science and Medicine, 33(4), 509–18.Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (2004). MMR immunisation of children by their second birthday: by region, 2002/3: Social Trends 34. www.statistics.gov.uk
Owens, S. R. (2002). Injection of confidence. EMBO Reports, 3 (5), 406–9.Google Scholar
Peltola, H., Patja, A.et al. (1998). No evidence for measles mumps and rubella vaccine-associated inflammatory bowel disease or autism in a 14-year prospective study. The Lancet, 351, 1327–8.Google Scholar
Phillips, Bridgeman, J. & Ferguson-Smith, M. (2000). The BSE Inquiry. London, UK: The Stationery Office. Accessed from www.bseinquirg.gov.uk
Roberts, K. A., Dixon-Woods, M.et al. (2002). Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. The Lancet, 360, 1596–9.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. & Ernst, E. (2003). MMR vaccination advice over the internet. Vaccine, 21, 1044–7.Google Scholar
Smith, A., McCann, R. & McKinlay, I. (2001). Second dose of MMR vaccine: health professionals' level of confidence in the vaccine and attitudes towards the second dose. Communicable Disease and Public Health, 4, 273–7.Google Scholar
Smailbegovic, M. S., Laing, G. J. & Bedford, H. (2003). Why do parents decide against immunisation? The effect of health beliefs and health professionals. Child: Care, Health and Development, 29(4), 303–11.Google Scholar
Vernon, J. G. (2003). Immunisation policy: from compliance to concordance?British Journal of General Practice, 53, 399–404.Google Scholar
Wakefield, A. J., Pittilo, R. M., Sim, R.et al. (1993). Evidence of persistent measles virus infection in Crohn's disease. Journal of Medical Virology, 39, 345–53.Google Scholar
Wakefield, A. J., Murch, S. H., Anthony, A.et al. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children: an early report. The Lancet, 351, 637–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×