Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:20:57.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Enamel microporosity and its functional implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2009

Mark F. Teaford
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Moya Meredith Smith
Affiliation:
Guy's Hospital, London
Mark W. J. Ferguson
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Despite its great hardness and density, enamel has an appreciable porosity. Pore structure affects the mechanical properties of enamel. It also influences the interaction between light and enamel, understanding of which is necessary for development of transillumination techniques for caries detection and for optical matching of restorative materials and tooth tissue. However, interest in enamel porosity has above all been stimulated by the important role played by diffusion of acids and mineral ions in caries formation. Because enamel mineral exists as very small crystals, organised in an elaborate structure, the internal pores are small and variable in form, orientation and distribution. Microscopical information on pore structure tends to be prone to artefact but much information has been obtained by a range of less direct methods. Most studies have employed human or bovine permanent enamel.

Pores in relation to enamel structure

Average porosity and the state of enamel water

Techniques used for estimating the mineral content (and hence porosity) of enamel include quantitative microradiography and measurements of enamel density. Both methods require a knowledge of the density of the apatite crystals of enamel, and in the past it has been assumed that they have the same density as hydroxyapatite (3.15 g/ml). However, recent work (Elliott, 1997), which concluded that enamel apatite has a lower density (2.99 g/ml), suggests that many previous estimates of mineral content may be too low. For instance the much-quoted mineral estimate by Angmar et al. (1963) of 86.2% v/v (based on an apatite density of 3.15) has been revised upwards to 93.1% by Elliott (1997) using an apatite density of 2.99.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×