Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:31:45.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Female multiple mating and genetic benefits in humans: investigations of design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Steven W. Gangestad
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Randy Thornhill
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Peter M. Kappeler
Affiliation:
Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany
Carel P. van Schaik
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

William James, one of the founders of scientific psychology (see James, 1890), tells a personal story in which he awoke from a dream one night with a flash of insight. Wanting not to forget it, he scribbled down, in his half-wakened state, the insight and went back to bed. In the morning he recalled having this revelation but not its content, and excitedly went to read his recording. Disappointed, he found these words: Higamus, hogamus, women are monogamous; Hogamus, higamus, men are polygamous (Kitcher, 1987).

Almost certainly, James would not have been able to anticipate that, 100 years later, the whole question of female monogamy or its absence, polyandry, would become one of the most fascinating topics in behavioural biology.

A recent paper published in Animal Behaviour (Zeh & Zeh, 2001, p. 1051) claimed that behavioural ecology is in the process of undergoing a paradigm shift, with ‘the traditional concept of the choosy, monogamous female increasingly giving way to the realisation that polyandry is pervasive in natural populations’ even when males invest substantially in offspring. One form of polyandry that has received much attention is extra-pair copulation (EPC) – sex that a female with a social mate has with a male who is not the social mate. The data showing a mean extra-pair paternity rate of 10–15 per cent in socially monogamous birds (with some rates as high as 70 per cent) are highly familiar (Birkhead & Møller, 1995; Petrie & Kempenaers, 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Sexual Selection in Primates
New and Comparative Perspectives
, pp. 90 - 114
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiello, L. C. & Key, C. 2002. Energetic consequences of being a Homo erectus female. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 551–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R. D. & Noonan, K. 1979. Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, ed. N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury, pp. 402–35
Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W. & Matthews, D. 2003. Adaptationism – how to carry out the exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in press
Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature, 415, 787–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 10460–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. R. & Bellis, M. A. 1995. Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation and Infidelity. London: Chapman and Hall
Beckerman, S., Lizarralde, R., Ballew, C.et al. 1998. The Bari partible paternity project: preliminary results. Current Anthropology, 39, 164–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellis, M. A. & Baker, R. R. 1990. Do females promote sperm competition? Data for humans. Animal Behaviour, 40, 997–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benshoof, L. & Thornhill, R. 1979. The evolution of monogamy and loss of estrus in humans. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 2, 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D. S. & Wero, J. L. 1993. Accuracy of face perception: a view from ecological psychology. Journal of Personality, 61, 497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T. R. & M⊘ller, A. P. 1995. Extra-pair copulation and extra-pair paternity in birds. Animal Behaviour, 49, 843–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T. R. & Pizzari, T. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 262–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. 2002. Learning, life history, and productivity: children's lives in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Human Nature, 13, 161–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R. & Kemp, D. J. 2001. Can older males deliver the good genes?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 308–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, K. L. & Catchpole, C. K. 2000. Extrapair paternity in the sedge warbler Acrosephalus schoenobaenus as veiled by multilocus DNA fingerprinting. Ibis, 142, 12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, N. 1986. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. American Naturalist, 127, 415–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. 1992. Concealed ovulation and sexual signals in primates. Folia Primatologica, 58, 1–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, A. 1995. Perspective: the evolution of fitness. Evolution, 49, 1–8Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. 1988. From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. 2000. Dangerous Passions. New York, NY: Free
Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. 1993. Sexual strategies theory: a contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerda-Flores, R. M., Barton, S. A., Marty-Gonzalez, L. F., Rivas, F. & Chakraborty, R. 1999. Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nueveo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 281–933.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B. 1987. The heritability of fitness. In Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 22–40
Charlesworth, B. 1990. Mutation–selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genetical Research, 55, 199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B. & Hughes, K. A. 1998. The maintenance of genetic variation in life history traits. In Evolutionary Genetics from Molecules to Morphology, ed. R. S. Singh & C. B. Krimbas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 369–91
Ellegren, H., Gustafsson, L. & Sheldon, B. C. 1996. Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 11723–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, P., Cristello, M. & Whitmeyer, J. 2003. FA and sperm quality in a sample of Boston men. Evolution and Human Behavior, in press
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon
Flinn, M. 1987. Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 1–28Google Scholar
Forstmeier, W., Kempenaers, B., Meyer, A. & Leisler, B. 2002. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 1479–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R. C. & Houle, D. 2003. Inheritance of developmental instability. In Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences, ed. M. Polak, in press. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Furlow, B. F., Armijo-Prewitt, T., Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264, 823–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furlow, B. F., Gangestad, S. W. & Armijo-Prewitt, T. 1998. Developmental stability and human violence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. & Simpson, J. A. 1990. Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. 1997a. Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In Evolutionary Social Psychology, ed. J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 169–95
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. 1997b. The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. 1998. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265, 927–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. 1999. Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 402–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. 2003a. Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, in press
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. 2003b. Fluctuating asymmetry, developmental stability, and fitness: toward model-based interpretation. In Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences, ed. M. Polak, in press. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. & Yeo, R. A. 1994. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Bennett, K. L. & Thornhill, R. 2001. A latent variable model of developmental stability in relation to men's number of sex partners. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 1677–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. & Garver, C. E. 2002. Changes in women's sexual interests and their partners' mate retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 975–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver, C. E. & Christensen, P. N. 2003a. Women's preferences for male behavioural displays shift across the menstrual cycle. Manuscript under review
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Quinlan, R. J. & Flinn, M. V. 2003b. Fluctuating asymmetry, attractiveness, and reproduction in a rural Caribbean village. Manuscript under review
Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 531–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, D. C. 1998. Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Geary, D. C. 2000. Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, D. C. & Flinn, M. V. 2002. Sex differences in behavioural and hormonal response to social threat: commentary on Taylor et al. 2000. Psychological Review, 109, 745–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getty, T. 1999. Handicap signalling: when fecundity and mortality do not add up. Animal Behaviour, 56, 127–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, D., Graves, J., Hazon, N. & Wells, A. 1999. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science, 286, 126–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144, 517–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, P. B., Kahlenberg, S. M., Barrett, E. S., Lipson, S. F. & Ellison, P. T. 2002. Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Todd, M. & Finch, J. F. 1997. Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary perspective: women's reactions to dominant and prosocial men. In Evolutionary Social Psychology, ed. J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 141–67
Greiling, H. & Buss, D. M. 2000. Women's sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of short-term extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–63
Griffith, S. C. & Sheldon, B. C. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the expression of sexually selected traits: neglected components of variation. Animal Behaviour, 61, 987–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, L., Nordling, D., Andersson, M. S., Sheldon, B. C. & Qvarnström, A. 1994. Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 346, 323–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, L., Qvarnström, A. & Sheldon, B. C. 1995. Trade-offs between life history traits and a secondary sexual character in male collared flycatchers. Nature, 375, 311–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, E. H., Hames, R. B., Craig, N. M., Lauer, M. T. & Price, M. E. 2001. Parental investment and child health in a Yanomamo village suffering short-term food stress. Journal of Biosocial Science, 33, 503–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1982. Pathogens as causes of genetic diversity in their host populations. In Population Biology of Infectious Diseases, ed. R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 269–96
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites. Science, 218, 384–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselquist, D. 1998. Polygyny in great reed warblers: a long-term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology, 79, 2376–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & Schantz, T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extrapair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature, 381, 229–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, K. & Bird, R. B. 2002. Showing off, handicap signaling, and men's work. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11, 58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, R., Connell, J. F. & Blurton Jones, N. G. 2001. Hunting and nuclear families: some lessons from the Hadza about men's work. Current Anthropology, 42, 681–709Google Scholar
Herz, R. S. & Cahill, E. D. 1997. Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender. Human Nature, 8, 275–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. 1996. Ache Life History. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter
Hoi, H. 1997. Assessment of the quality of copulation partners in the monogamous bearded tit. Animal Behaviour, 53, 277–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of traits. Genetics, 130, 195–204Google ScholarPubMed
Houle, D. 2000. A simple model of the relationship between asymmetry and developmental stability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 720–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, D. & Kondrashov, A. S. 2002. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 97–104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houtman, A. M. 1992. Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 249, 3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1979. Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1999. Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection. New York, NY: Pantheon
Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A. & Gallup, G. G. 2002. The sound of symmetry: voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 173–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, Y. & Pomiankowski, A. 1994. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution, 48, 853–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The ‘handicap’ principle. Evolution, 45, 1431–42Google ScholarPubMed
Jacob, S., McClintock, M. K., Zelano, B. & Ober, C. 2002. Paternally inherited alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor. Nature Genetics, 30, 175–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan
Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jöchle, W. 1973. Coitus induced ovulation. Contraception, 7, 523–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, A., Andersen, V., Sunding, C. & Lifjeld, J. T. 2000. Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations. Nature, 406, 296–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsen, A., Lifjeld, J. T., Andersson, S., Ornborg, J. & Amundsen, T. 2001. Male characteristics and fertilisation success in male bluethroats. Behavior, 138, 1371–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. 2001. Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 251–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H. S., Hill, K., Lancaster, J. B. & Hurtado, A. M. 2000. A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–853.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E. & Gebhard, P. H. 1953. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders
Kirkpatrick, M. 1996. Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences. Evolution, 50, 2125–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. H. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 1282–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, P. 1987. Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kokko, H. 1998. Good genes, old age and life history trade-offs. Evolutionary Ecology, 12, 739–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T. & Michaels, S. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Leigh, S. R. 2001. Evolution of human growth. Evolutionary Anthropology, 10, 223–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lens, L., Dongen, S., Kark, S. & Matthysen, E. 2002. Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of fitness: can we bridge the gap between studies?Biological Reviews, 77, 27–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, W. R. & Robertson, M. L. 1997. Comparative primate energetics and hominid evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102, 265–813.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubjuhn, T., Strohbach, S., Brun, J., Gerken, T. & Epplen, J. T. 1999. Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major): a long-term study. Behavior, 136, 1157–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luuthe, V., Sugimoto, Y., Puy, L.et al. 1994. Characterization, expression, and immunohistochemical localization of 5-alpha-reductase activity in human skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 102, 221–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., Blanchard, J., Houle, D.et al. 1999. Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution, 53, 645–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, J. T. & Wood, D. 1998. Fluctuating asymmetry and aggression in boys. Human Nature, 9, 53–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, J. T., Koukourakis, K. & Brodie, D. A. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry, metabolic rate and sexual selection in human males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D. & Lewis-Jones, D. I. 1998. Developmental stability, ejaculate size and sperm quality in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 273–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, F. 2000. Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, S. & Sooman, A. 1991. Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. Lancet, 338, 869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michl, G., Torok, J., Griffith, S. C. & Sheldon, B. C. 2002. Experimental analysis of sperm competition mechanisms in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 5466–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⊘ller, A. P. 1999. Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity and survival. Ecology Letters, 2, 149–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⊘ller, A. P. & Alatalo, R. V. 1999. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⊘ller, A. P. & Swaddle, J. P. 1997. Asymmetry, Developmental Stability and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press
M⊘ller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 1998a. Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. American Naturalist, 151, 174–92Google Scholar
M⊘ller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 1998b. Male parental care, differential parental investment by females, and sexual selection. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1507–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⊘ller, A. P., Saino, N., Taramino, G., Galeotti, P. & Ferrario, S. 1998. Paternity and sexual signaling: effects of a secondary sexual character and song on paternity in the barn swallow. American Naturalist, 151, 236–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⊘ller, A. P., Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. 1999. Nonlinearity and the importance of fluctuating asymmetry as a predictor of fitness. Oikos, 86, 366–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomerie, R. & Bullock, H. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry and the human female orgasm. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, UT, June
Oliver-Rodriguez, J. C., Guan, Z. & Johnston, V. S. 1999. Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. Psychophysiology, 36, 176–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otter, K., Ratcliffe, L., Michaud, D. & Boag, P. T. 1998. Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otter, K. A., Stewart, I. R. K., McGregor, P. K.et al. 2001. Extra-pair paternity among great tits Parus major following manipulation of male signals. Journal of Avian Biology, 32, 338–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pärt, T. & Qvarnström, A. 1997. Badge size in collared flycatchers predicts outcome of male competition over territories. Animal Behaviour, 54, 893–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowski, B. 1999. Loss of oestrus and concealed ovulation in human evolution: the case against the sexual-selection hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 40, 257–75Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. 2000. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D.et al. 1999. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically. Nature, 399, 741–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I.et al. 1998. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrie, M. & Kempenaers, B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 52–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzari, T., Froman, D. P. & Birkhead, T. R. 2002. Pre- and post-insemination episodes of sexual selection in the fowl, Gallus g. domesticus. Heredity, 88, 112–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomiankowski, A. N. 1988. The evolution of mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 5, 136–84Google Scholar
Pomiankowski, A. N. & M⊘ller, A. P. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 260, 21–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvarnström, A. 1997. Experimentally increased badge size increases male competition and reduces male parental care in the collared flycatcher. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264, 1225–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvarnström, A. 1999a. Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution, 53, 1564–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvarnström, A. 1999b. Different reproductive tactics in male collared flycatchers signalled by size of secondary sexual character. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 2089–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvarnström, A., Part, T. & Sheldon, B. C. 2000. Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort. Nature, 405, 344–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratti, O., Hovi, M., Lundberg, A., Telegstrom, H. & Alatalo, R. V. 1995. Extra-pair paternity and male characteristics in the pied flycatcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 419–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, H. K. & Sherman, P. W. 1993. Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, P. C. & Berscheid, E. 1995. Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female sexual desire. Personal Relationships, 2, 345–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381, 232–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1998. The enemies within: intragenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. S. & Burke, T. 1999. Extra-pair paternity in relation to male age in Bullock's orioles. Molecular Ecology, 8, 2115–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rikowski, A. & Grammer, K. 1999. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 869–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996. The lex paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition-dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 263, 1415–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, G., Muller, H., Chakraborty, R. & Ott, J. 1994. Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Human Heredity, 44, 337–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. 1999. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 1318–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., LeBlanc, et al. 1999. Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Human Nature, 11, 299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., LeBlanc, G. J., Weekes-Shakelford, et al. 2002. Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 123–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, B. C. & Ellegren, H. 1999. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Animal Behaviour, 57, 285–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheldon, B. C., Merila, J., Qvarnström, A., Gustafsson, L. & Ellegren, H. 1997. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264, 297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, B. C., Davidson, P. & Lindgren, G. 1999. Mate replacement in experimentally widowed collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): determinants and outcomes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 141–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillén-Tullberg, B. & M⊘ller, A. P. 1993. The relationship between concealed ovulation and mating systems in anthropoid primates: a phylogenetic analysis. American Naturalist, 141, 1–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Christensen, P. N. & Leck, K. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 159–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, D. & Bronstad, P. M. 2001. Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 797–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, B. B. & Smuts, R. W. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, C. B. 1998. The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos. Current Anthropology, 39, 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutchbury, B. J. M., Piper, W. H., Neudorf, D. L.et al. 1997. Correlates of extra-pair fertilization success in hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 119–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaddle, J. P. & Reierson, G. W. 2002. Testosterone increases the perceived dominance but not attractiveness of human males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 2285–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, D. 1979. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Symons, D. 1992. On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, ed. J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–59
Thoma, R. J., Yeo, R. A., Gangestad, S. W., Lewine, J. D. & Davis, J. T. 2002. Fluctuating asymmetry and the human brain. Laterality, 7, 45–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, A. P. 1983. Extramarital sex: a review of the research literature. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. 1990. The study of adaptation. In Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Behavior, ed. M. Bekoff & D. Jamieson. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 31–62
Thornhill, R. 1997. The concept of an evolved adaptation. In Characterizing Human Psychological Adaptations, ed. M. Daly. London: Wiley, pp. 4–13
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1993. Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and human sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1999a. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness?Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1999b. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 2003. Do women have evolved adaptation for extra-pair copulation? In Evolutionary Aesthetics, ed. E. Voland & K. Grammer. Hamburg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 341–68
Thornhill, R. & M⊘ller, A. P. 1997. Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews, 72, 497–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Palmer, C. T. 2000. A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W. & Comer, R. 1995. Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R. et al. 2003. MHC, symmetry and body scent attractiveness in men and women (Homo sapiens). Behavioral Ecology
Tooby, J. 1982. Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 97, 557–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, ed. B. Campbell. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 139–79
Troisi, A. & Carosi, M. 1998. Female orgasm rate increases with male dominance in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1261–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dongen, S. 2000. The heritability of fluctuating asymmetry: a Bayesian hierarchical model. Acta Zoologica Fennici, 37, 15–23Google Scholar
Wagner, G. P. & Altenberg, L. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, R. H. 1992. The pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female razorbills: how do females benefit?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 455–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P. J. 1998. Multi-male mating and female choice increase offspring growth in the spider Neriene litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Animal Behaviour, 55, 387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, C. & Füri, S. 1997. Body odour preference in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264, 1471–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F. & Paepke, A. J. 1995. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 260, 245–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R. & Baird, B. D. 1995. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 1517–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Wilson, M. & Daly, M. 1992. The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, ed. J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–326
Yeo, R. A., Hill, D., Campbell, R., Vigil, J. & Brooks, W. M. 2000. Developmental instability and working memory ability in children: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy investigation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 17, 143–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeh, J. A. & Zeh, D. W. 2001. Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1051–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×