Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:36:16.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Habitat fragmentation and biological control

from Part III - Spatial considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2009

Bradford A. Hawkins
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Howard V. Cornell
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the modern agricultural landscape, habitat destruction by agricultural activities is the most frequent cause of extinction in plants and animals. In addition to these deterministic causes of extinction, reductions in population size due to habitat fragmentation lead to further stochastic or random species losses (Shaffer, 1981; Saunders et al., 1991; Tscharntke, 1992a; Baur & Erhardt, 1995). Habitat destruction reduces the total area available for certain organisms, while habitat fragmentation generates a spatial pattern of more-or-less isolated habitats or populations. This disruption to habitat continuity is accompanied by significant changes in habitat characteristics and community dynamics.

Habitat fragmentation is usually only considered in the context of conservation, but is also closely related to the efficiency of biological control in the agricultural landscape. First, the spatio-temporal mosaic of natural habitats can be manipulated in such a way that populations of beneficials increase relative to pests. The propagation of natural enemy populations is part of a conservation strategy to increase biodiversity by increasing connectivity of natural habitats in the landscape (see Gliessman, 1990; van Hook, 1994; Fry, 1995; Van Driesche & Bellows, 1996). Second, annual crop fields are like defaunated islands, since they are usually cleared each year during harvest; that is, human destruction of established plant–insect communities necessitates annual recolonization of crop fields with corresponding annual rejuvenation of communities. Conservation management to enhance biological control can be viewed as an effort to neutralize the island-status of crop fields with a mosaic of old and closely interconnected habitat patches.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×