Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T12:35:09.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Protein-based life as an emergent property of matter: the nature and biological fitness of the protein folds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

By
Michael J. Denton
Edited by
John D. Barrow ,
Simon Conway Morris ,
Stephen J. Freeland  and
Charles L. Harper, Jr
Michael J. Denton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Conway Morris
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen J. Freeland
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Charles L. Harper, Jr
Affiliation:
John Templeton Foundation
Get access

Summary

The thesis I shall present in this book is that the biosphere does not contain a predictable class of events but is a particular event, certainly compatible indeed with first principles, but not deducible from those principles and therefore essentially unpredictable.

Jacques Monod (1972), Chance and Necessity

The process of crystallization in inorganic nature … is … the nearest analogue to the formation of cells … should we not therefore be justified in putting forward the proposition that the formation of the elementary parts of organisms is nothing but a crystallization and the organism nothing but an aggregate of such crystals?

Theodore Schwann (1847), Microscopical Researches

The laws of light as of gravitation being the same [on other planets] … the inference as to the possibility of the vertebrate type being the basis of organization of some of the inhabitants of other planets will not appear so hazardous.

Richard Owen (1849), On the Nature of Limbs

Introduction

In his great classic The Fitness of the Environment (1913), Lawrence J. Henderson examined the fitness of the basic chemical constituents and chemical processes used by living organisms on earth and of the general environment, including the hydrosphere and atmosphere of the earth, and argued that the laws of nature and the properties of matter appear uniquely and maximally fit for life as it exists on earth.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fitness of the Cosmos for Life
Biochemistry and Fine-Tuning
 , pp. 256 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anfinsen, C. B. (1973). Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science, 181, 223–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banavar, J. R. and Maritan, A. (2003a). Colloquium: geometrical approach to protein folding: a tube picture. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banavar, J. R. and Maritan, A. (2003b). Comment on the protein folds as platonic forms. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223, 263–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, G. J., Todd, A. E. and Thornton, J. M. (2003). Inferring protein function from structure. In Structural Informatics, ed. Bourne, P. E. and Weissig, H.. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 387–407.Google Scholar
Brandon, C. and Tooze, J. (1999). Introduction to Protein Structure, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Brenner, S. E., Chothia, C. and Hubbard, T. J. (1997). Population statistics of protein structures: lessons from structural classifications. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 7, 369–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R. A. (2001). The relationship between matter and life. Nature, 409, 409–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Car, B. J. and Rees, M. J. (1979). The Anthropic Principle and the structure of the physical world. Nature, 278, 605–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivian, D., Robertson, T., Bonneau, R. et al. (2003). Ab initio methods. In Structural Bioinformatics, ed. Bourne, P. E. and Weissig, H.. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chothia, C. (1984). Principles that determine the structure of proteins. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 53, 537–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chothia, C. (1993). One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature, 357, 543–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chothia, C. and Finkelstein, A. V. (1990). The classification and origins of protein folding patterns. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 59, 1007–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chothia, C., Hubbard, T., Brenner, S.et al. (1997). Protein folds in the all α and all β classes. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structures, 26, 597–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copleston, F. (1946). The History of Philosophy, vol. 1. London: Burnes and Oates and Washbourne Ltd.Google Scholar
Davies, P. (1982). The Accidental Universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denton, M. J. (1998). Nature's Destiny. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Denton, M. J. and Marshall C. J. (2001). Laws of form revisited. Nature, 410, 417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denton, M. J., Marshall, C. J. and Legge, M. (2002). The protein folds as platonic forms: new support for the pre-Darwinian conception of evolution by natural law. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 219, 325–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinner, A. R.et al. (2000). Understanding protein folding via free energy surfaces from theory and experiment. Trends in Biochemical Science, 25, 331–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eschenmoser, A. (1999). Chemical etiology of nucleic acid structure. Science, 284, 2118–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelstein, A. V. and Ptitsyn, O. B. (1987). Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns?Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 50, 171–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florey, P. J. (1969). Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, H., Parak, F. and Young, R. D. (1988). Conformational substates in proteins. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, 17, 451–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fruton, J. S. (1999). Proteins, Enzymes, Genes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gerlt, J. A. and Babbit, P. C. (2001). Divergent evolution of enzymic function. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 70, 209–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomperz, T. (1912). The Greek Thinkers, vol. 1. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. J. (1913). The Fitness of the Environment: An Inquiry into the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter. New York: Macmillan. Repr. (1958) Boston, MA: Beacon Press; (1970) Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. J. (1917). The Order of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L. and Sander, C. (1996). Mapping the protein universe. Science, 273, 595–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyle, F. (1964). Galaxies, Nuclei and Quasars. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hoyle, F. (1994). Home Is Where the Wind Blows. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. (2000). Vital Forces. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
James, L. C. and Tawfik, D. S. (2003). Conformational diversity and protein evolution – a 60 year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends in Biochemical Science, 28, 361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonas, H. (2001). The Phenomenon of Life. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Judson., E. (1979). The Eighth Day of Creation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Karpus, M. and McCammon, J. A. (1986). The dynamics of proteins. Scientific American, 254(4), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpus, M. and Petsko, G. A. (1990). Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature, 347, 631–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, C. G. (1989). Artificial life. In Artificial Life, ed. Langton, C. G.. (Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Symposium held in September 1987 in Los Alamos, New Mexico.) New York, NY: Addison-Wesley, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Lee, M. C. S. and Schekman, R. (2004). BAR domains go on a bender. Science, 303, 479–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehn, J. M. (2002). Earth's self-organization and complex matter. Science, 295, 2400–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesk, A. M. (2001). Introduction to Protein Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. and Chothia, C. (1976). Structural patterns in protein structures. Nature, 261, 552–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, S. (1993). The Quest for a New Creation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lindgard, P. and Bohr, H. (1996). How many protein fold classes are to be found? In Protein Folds, ed. Bohr, H. and Brunak, S.. New York, NY: CRC Press, pp. 98–102.Google Scholar
Locher, K. P., Bass, R. B. and Ress, D. C. (2003). Breaching the barrier. Science, 301, 603–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, M. (2003). Discovering genes are made of DNA. Nature, 421, 406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monod, J. (1972). Chance and Necessity. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Moore, P. B. (1999). The RNA folding problem. In The RNA World, ed. Gesteland, R. F., Cech, T. R. and Atkins, J. F.. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 381–401.Google Scholar
Oh, K., Jeong, K. and Moore, J. S. (2001). Folding-driven synthesis of oligomers. Nature, 414, 889–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orengo, C. A., Jones, D. T. and Thornton, J. M. (1994). Protein superfamilies and domain structures. Nature, 372, 631–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orengo, C. A., Michie, A. D., Jones, S.et al. (1997). CATH – a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5(8), 1093–108. See cath www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/latest/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orengo, C. A., Pearl, F. M. G. and Thornton, J. M. (2003). The CATH domain structure database. In Structural Informatics, ed. Bourne, P. E. and Weissig, H.. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 249–71.Google Scholar
Owen, R. (1849). On the Nature of Limbs. London: Jan Van Voorst.
Perutz, M. F. (1983). Species adaptation in a protein molecule. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1, 1–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Peter, B. J., Kent, H. M., Mills, I. G.et al. (2004). BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure. Science, 303, 495–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. (1965). Conjectures and Refutations. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Przytycka, T., Aurora, R. and Rose, G. D. (1999). A protein taxonomy based on secondary structure. Nature Structural Biology, 6, 672–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Ptitsyn, O. B. and Finkelstein, A. V. (1980). Similarities of protein topologies: evolutionary divergence, functional convergence or principles of folding. Quarterly Review of Biophysics, 13, 339–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, G. N. and Sasisekharan, V. (1968). Conformations of polypeptides and proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 28, 283–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, S.et al. (2004). Transitions from nonliving to living matter. Science, 303, 963–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, J. S. (1981). The anatomy and taxonomy of proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 34, 168–339.Google Scholar
Rose, G. D. (1979). Hierarchic organization of domains in globular proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 134, 447–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, G. D. (2002). Getting to know U in unfolded proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 62, xv–xxi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. D. (2003). A long day's journey into simplicity. Talk given at the International Workshop on Proteomics: Protein Structure and Interactions (May 5–16) at the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. Published online: http:/agenda.ictp.trieste.it/smr.php?1499∗.
Russell, R., Zhuang, X., Babcock, H.et al. (2002). Exploring the folding landscape of a structured RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 155–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanger, F. (1952). The arrangement of amino acids in proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 7, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheraga, H. A. (1963). Intramolecular bonds in proteins. II. Noncovalent bonds. In The Proteins, ed. Neurath, H., 2nd edn, vol. 1. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 477–594.Google Scholar
Schwann, T. (1847). Microscopical Researches, trans. H. Smith. London: Sydenham Society. Original published in German (1839).Google Scholar
Seeman, N. C. (2003). DNA in a material world. Nature, 421, 427–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, W. M., Quispe, J. D. and Joyce, G. F. (2004). A 1.7-kilobase single stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron. Nature, 427, 615–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shozo, Y. (2002). Evaluating adaptive evolution. Nature Genetics, 30, 350–1.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, R. and Rose, G. D. (1999). A physical basis for protein secondary structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 14258–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, R and Rose, G. D. (2002). Ab initio prediction of protein structure using LINUS. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, 47, 489–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surrey, T., Nedelec, F., Leibler, S.et al. (2001). Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science, 292, 1167–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, W. R. (2002). A periodic table for protein structures. Nature, 416, 657–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinkaus, J. P. (1984). Cells into Organs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Voet, D. and Voet, J. G. (1995). Biochemistry. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1976). Molecular Biology of the Gene. Menlo Park, CA: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Wernisch, L. and Wodak, S. J. (2003). Identifying structural domains in proteins. In Structural Informatics, ed. Bourne, P. E. and Weissig, H.. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 365–85.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. P. and Fraústo da Silva, J. J. R. (2003). Evolution was chemically constrained. Journal of Theoretical Biology 220, 323–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×