Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T12:09:04.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Land use, hydrological function and economic valuation

from Part I - Current trends and perspectives on people–land use–water issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

B. Aylward
Affiliation:
Deschutes Resources Conservancy, Bend, USA
M. Bonell
Affiliation:
UNESCO, Paris
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Land use change affects economic activity both directly and indirectly. In the process of land colonisation that accompanies economic development and population growth, naturally occurring vegetation is typically affected in one of three ways: (1) available biomass and species are harvested and then left to regenerate before harvesting again, (2) the vegetation is simplified (in terms of its biological diversity) in order to increase production from selected species or (3) the existing vegetation is largely removed to make way for the production of domesticated species, the installation of infrastructure or urbanisation. The direct, and desired, impact of land use change under these circumstances is to raise the economic productivity of the land unit. Of course, many indirect (and perhaps unintentional) environmental impacts result as well. These impacts reflect the economic values attributed to natural vegetation and biogeophysical processes. Conversely, efforts to recuperate degraded lands or to protect natural ecosystems may forsake direct productive benefits in favour of fostering these indirect environmental values.

The loss of biodiversity and alteration of ecological processes accompanying the logging and conversion of forestland have captured the public imagination in the 1990s, with corresponding growth in research aimed at illustrating these indirect ecological and economic impacts (Perrings et al., 1992; Barbier et al., 1994). This chapter concerns itself with another type of environmental value: the impact of land use change on the hydrological cycle.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics
Past, Present and Future Hydrological Research for Integrated Land and Water Management
, pp. 99 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, M., Aylward, B., and Echeverría, J. (1996). Management of Natural Forest for Off-Site Hydrological Benefits in the Magallenes National Reserve. Santiago, Chile: Corporación Nacional Forestal, Environmental Resources Management, Ltd., British Council
Aylward, B. (1998). Economic Valuation of the Downstream Hydrological Effects of Land Use Change: Large Hydroelectric Reservoirs. Unpublished Ph. D. diss., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Medford, MA
Aylward, B., and Echeverria, J. (2001). Synergies between Livestock Production and Hydrological Function in Arenal, Costa Rica. Environment and Development Economics, 6(3), 359–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylward, B., and Fernández González, A. (1998). Incentives and Institutional Arrangements for Watershed Management: A Case Study of Arenal, Costa Rica, CREED Working Paper Series. London: International Institute for Environment and Development and Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University, Amsterdam
Barbier, E. B. (1998). Natural Capital and the Economics of Environment and Development. In E. B. Barbier (Ed.), The Economics of Environment and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Barbier, E. B., and Bishop, J. (1995). Economic Values and Incentives Affecting Soil and Water Conservation in Developing Countries. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 50(2), 133–37Google Scholar
Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., and Folke, C. (1994). Paradise Lost? The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity. London: Earthscan
Barrow, P., Hinsley, A., and Price, C. (1986). The Effect of Afforestation on Hydroelectricity Generation. A Quantitative Assessment. Land Use Policy(4), 141–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, J. (1992). Economic Analysis of Soil Degradation, LEEC Gatekeeper Series (Vol. 92–01, pp. 13). London: International Institute for Environment and Development
Bishop, J. (1995). The Economics of Soil Degradation: An Illustration of the Change in Productivity Approach to Valuation in Mali and Malawi, LEEC Discussion Paper (Vol. 95–02, pp. 79). London: International Institute for Environment and Development
Bosch, J. M., and Hewlett, J. D. (1982). A Review of Catchment Experiments to Determine the Effect of Vegetation Changes on Water Yield and Evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 55, 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwes, N. W. (1979). Procedures in Estimating Benefits of Water Quality Change. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 535–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briones, N. D. (1986). Estimating Erosion Costs: A Philippine Case Study in the Lower Agno River Watershed. In K. W. Easter and J. A. Dixon and M. M. Hufschmidt (Eds.), Watershed Resources Management: An Integrated Framework with Studies from Asia and the Pacific (pp. 205–18). Boulder: Westview Press
Brooks, K. N., Gregersen, H. M., Berglund, E. R., and Tayaa, M. (1982). Economic Evaluation of Watershed Projects: An Overview Methodology and Application. Water Resources Bulletin, 18(2), 245–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M., de la Roca, I., Vallejo, A., Ford, G., Casey, J., Aguilar, B., and Haacker, R. (1996). A Valuation Analysis of the Role of Cloud Forests in Watershed Protection: Sierra de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala and Cusuco National Park, Honduras. Guatemala: RARE, Defensores de la Naturaleza and Fundación Ecologista Hector Rodrigo Pastor Fasquelle
Brown, T. C., Taylor, J. G., and Shelby, B. (1992). Assessing the Direct Effects of Streamflow on Recreation: A Literature Review. Water Resources Bulletin, 27(6), 979–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (1990). Hydrology of Moist Tropical Forests and Effects of Conversion: A State of Knowledge Review. Paris: International Hydrological Programme of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (1997). Hydrology of Forest Plantations in the Tropics. In E. K. S. Nambiar and A. G. Brown (Eds.), Management of Soil, Nutrients and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests (pp. 125–67). Canberra/Bogor: ACIAR/CSIRO/CIFOR
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (1998). Soil Chemical Changes after Tropical Forest Disturbance and Conversion: The Hydrological Perspective. In A. Schulte and D. Ruhyat (Eds.), Soils of Tropical Forest Ecosystems. Characteristics, Ecology and Management (pp. 45–61). Berlin: SpringerCrossRef
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004). Tropical forests and environmental services: not seeing the soil for the trees?Agriculture, Ecology and Environment. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A., and Proctor, J. (1995). Hydrology and Biogeochemistry of Tropical Montane Cloud Forest: What Do We Really Know? In L. S. Hamilton and J. O. Juvik and F. N. Scatena (Eds.), Tropical Montane Cloud Forests (Vol. Springer Ecol. Studies, pp. 38–78). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Calder, I. R. (1992). The Hydrological Impact of Land-Use Change (with Special Reference to Afforestation and Deforestation), Proceedings of the Natural Resources and Engineering Advisers Conference on Priorities for Water Resources Allocation and Management, Southampton, July 1992 (pp. 91–101). London: United Kingdom Overseas Development Administration
Calder, I. R. (1999). The Blue Revolution: Land Use and Integrated Water Resources Management. London: Earthscan
CCT, and CINPE. (1995). Valoración Económico Ecológica del Agua. San José: Centro Científico Tropical and Centro Internacional en Política Económica para el Desarrollo Sostenible
Cheng, G. W. (1999). Forest Change: Hydrological Effects in the Upper Yangtze River Valley. Ambio, 28, 457–59Google Scholar
Clark, E. H. (1985a). Eroding Soils: The Off-Farm Impacts. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation
Clark, E. H. (1985b). The Off-Site Costs of Soil Erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 40(1), 19–22Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1996). Methodologies for the Economic Analysis of Soil Erosion and Conservation, CSERGE Working Paper (Vol. GEC 96-13). Norwich: University of East Anglia
Creedy, J., and Wurzbacher, A. D. (2001). The Economic Value of a Forested Catchment with Timber, Water and Carbon Sequestration Benefits. Ecological Economics, 38(1), 71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosson, P. (1984). New Perspectives on Soil Conservation Policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 39(4), 222–25Google Scholar
Crosson, P. (1995). Soil Erosion and its On-Farm Productivity Consequences: What Do We Know?, Discussion Paper (Vol. 95-29, pp. 17). Washington: Resources for the Future
Crosson, P., and Miranowski, J. (1982). Soil Protection: Why, by Whom, and for Whom?Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 37(1), 27–28Google Scholar
Crowder, B. M. (1987). Economic Costs of Reservoir Sedimentation: A Regional Approach to Estimating Cropland Erosion Damages. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(3), 194–97Google Scholar
Cruz, W. D., Francisco, H., and Conway, Z. (1988). The On-Site and Downstream Costs of Soil Erosion in the Magat and Pantabangan Watersheds. Journal of Philippine Development, 15(26), 85–111Google Scholar
Daubert, J., and Young, R. (1981). Recreational Demands for Maintaining Instream Flows: A Contingent Valuation Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(4), 666–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaff, J. (1996). The Price of Soil Erosion: An Economic Evaluation of Soil Conservation and Watershed Development (Vol. 14). Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University
Wit, M., Crookes, D. J., and Wilgen, B. W. (forthcoming). Conflicts of Interest in Environmental Management: Estimating the Costs and Benefits of Black Wattle (Acacia mearnsii) in South Africa. Biological Invasions, 32(2), 167–178Google Scholar
de Wit, M., Crookies, D., Scott, D., Visser, W., and Netshiluvhi, T. (2000). Environmental Impacts of the Forestry Sector in South Africa with Specific Reference to Water Resources (ENV-P-C 99016, Project: JN716). Pretoria: Division of Water, Environment and Forestry Technology, CSIR; PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001
Duda, A. M. (1985). Environmental and Economic Damage Caused by Sediment from Agricultural Nonpoint Sources. Water Resource Bulletin, 21(2), 225–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, J. W., Neher, C. J., and Brown, T. C. (1992). Recreation Benefits of Instream Flow: Application to Montana's Big Hole and Bitterroot Rivers. Water Resources Research, 28(9), 2169–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duisberg, P. (1980). Erosión y Conservación de Suelos. In CCT (Ed.), Estudio Ecológico Integral de las Zonas de Afectación del Proyecto Arenal (pp. Anexo 2:1-65). San José: Centro Científico Tropical
Enters, T. (1995). The Economics of Land Degradation and Resources Conservation in Northern Thailand. In J. Rigg (Ed.), Counting the Costs: Economic Growth and Environmental Change in Thailand (pp. 90–110). Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies
Enters, T. (1998). Methods for the Economic Assessment of the On- and Off-site Impacts of Soil Erosion, Issues in Sustainable Land Management (Vol. 2, pp. 60). Bangkok: International Board for Soil Research and Management
Epp, D. J., and Al-Ani, K. S. (1979). The Effect of Water Quality on Rural Non-Farm Residential Property Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 529–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, D. L., and Abrahim, G. (1985). Sediment Deposits in Drainage Ditches: A Cropland Externality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 40(1), 141–43Google Scholar
Forster, D. L., Bardos, C. P., and Southgate, D. (1987). Soil Erosion and Water Treatment Costs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(1), 349–52Google Scholar
Fox, G., and Dickson, E. (1990). The Economics of Erosion and Sediment Control in Southwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 38, 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A. M. (1993). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington DC: Resources for the Future
Gregersen, H. M., Brooks, K. N., Dixon, J. A., and Hamilton, L. S. (1987). Guidelines for Economic Appraisal of Watershed Management Projects, FAO Conservation Guide (Vol. 16, pp. 144). Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization
Gunatilake, H. M., and Gopalakrishnan, C. (1999). The Economics of Reservoir Sedimentation: A Case Study of Mahaweli Reserviors in Sri Lanka. Water Resources Development, 15(4), 511–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guntermann, K. L., Lee, M. T., and Swanson, E. R. (1975). The Off-site Sediment Damage Function in Selected Illinois Watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 30, 219–25Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Xiao, X., Gan, Y., and Zheng, Y. (2001). Ecosystem Functions, Services and their Values – a Case Study in Xingshan County of China. Ecological Economics, 38, 141–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, L. S., with King, P. N. (1983). Tropical Forested Watersheds: Hydrologic and Soils Response to Major Uses or Conversions. Boulder: Westview Press
Hamilton, L. S., and Pearce, A. (1986). Biophysical Aspects in Watershed Management. In C. W. Howe (Ed.), Watershed Resources Management: An Integrated Framework with Studies from Asia and the Pacific (1st ed., Vol. 10, pp. 33–49). Boulder: Westview Press
Hearne, R. R. (1996). A Review of Economic Appraisal of Environmental Goods and Services: With a Focus on Developing Countries, Environmental Economics Programme Discussion Paper (Vol. 96-03, pp. 13). London: International Institute for Environment and Development
Hitzhusen, F. J. (1992). The Economics of Sustainable Agriculture: Adding a Downstream Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2(2), 75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G., and Dixon, J. A. (1988). Logging Versus Fisheries and Tourism in Palawan: An Environmental and Economic Analysis, Occasional Paper (Vol. 7, pp. 95). Honolulu: East-West Center
Holmes, T. P. (1988). The Offsite Impact of Soil Erosion on the Water Treatment Industry. Land Economics, 64(4), 356–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, C. D. (2000). Operations, Monitoring and Decomissioning of Dams, WCD Thematic Review (Vol. IV.5). Cape Town: World Commission on Dams
Hubbard, R. K., and Lowrance, R. (1996). Solute Transport and Filtering Through a Riparian Forest. Transactions of the ASAE, 39(2), 477–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intercarib S. A, and Nathan Associates. (1996). Manejo Ambiental, Aspectos Institucionales, Económicos y Financieros: Volumen 2 de 2, Estudios Sectoriales. Panamá: Intercarib S.A. y Nathan Associates, Inc
Johnson, N., White, A., and Perrot-Maitre, D. (2001). Developing Markets for Water Services from Forests: Issues and Lessons for Innovators. Washington, DC: Forest Trends, World Resources Institute, The Katoomba Group
Johnson, N. S., and Adams, R. M. (1988). Benefits of Increased Streamflow: The Case of the John Day River Steelhead Fishery. Water Resources Research, 24(11), 1839–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. H., and Kolavalli, S. (1984). Physical and Economic Impacts of Sedimentation on Fishing Activities: Nam Pong Basin, Northeast Thailand. Water International, 9(4), 185–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, I.-H. (1984). An Economic Analysis of Watershed Practices: Impact of Grazing on Watershed (Erosion, Sedimentation, Valuation). Unpublished Ph. D. diss., Utah State University
Kumari, K. (1995). An Environmental and Economic Assesment of Forest Management Options: A Case Study in Malaysia, Environmental Economics Series, Environment Department Papers (Vol. 26, pp. 46). Washington, DC: World Bank
Lant, C. L., and Mullens, J. B. (1991). Lake and River Quality for Recreation Management and Contingent Valuation. Water Resources Bulletin, 27(3), 453–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledesma, H. R. (1996). Effects of Reservoir Sedimentation and the Economics of Watershed Management: Case Study of Aguacate Dam, Dominican Republic. Unpublished Ph. D. diss., University of Florida
Lutz, E., Pagiola, S., and Reiche, C. (1994). The Costs and Benefits of Soil Conservation: The Farmer's Viewpoint. The World Bank Research Observer, 9(2), 273–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magrath, W., and Arens, P. (1989). The Costs of Soil Erosion on Java: A Natural Resource Accounting Approach, Environment Department Working Paper (Vol. 18, pp. 60). Washington DC: World Bank
McConnell, K. (1983). An Economic Model of Soil Conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohd Shahwahid, H. O., Awang Noor, A. G., Abdul Rahim, N., Zulkifli, Y., and Ragame, U. (1997). Economic Benefits of Watershed Protection and Trade-off with Timber Production: A Case Study in Malaysia, EEPSEA Research Report Series. Singapore: Economy and Environment Program for South East Asia
Narayanan, R. (1986). Evaluation of Recreational Benefits of Instream Flows. Journal of Leisure Research, 18(2), 116–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, K. R., Lal, R., and Norton, L. D. (1994). Evaluation of Methods to Study Soil Erosion-Productivity Relationships. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 49(6), 586–90Google Scholar
Pattanayak, S. K., and Kramer, R. A. (2001a). Pricing Ecological Services: Willingness to Pay for Drought Mitigation from Watershed Protection in Eastern Indonesia. Water Resources Research, 37(3), 771–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattanayak, S. K., and Kramer, R. A. (2001b). Worth of Watersheds: A Producer Surplus Approach for Valuing Drought Mitigation in Eastern Indonesia. Environment and Development Economics, 6, 123–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrings, C., Folke, C., and Maler, K.-G. (1992). The Ecology and Economics of Biodiversity Loss: The Research Agenda. Ambio, 21(3), 201–11Google Scholar
Pielke, R. A., Walko, R. L., Steyaert, L. T., Vidale, P. L., Liston, G. E., Lyons, W. A., and Chase, T. N. (1999). The Influence of Anthropogenic Landscape Changes on Weather in South Florida. Am. Meteorol. Soc., (127), 1663–72Google Scholar
Pierce, F. J., Larson, W. E., Dowdy, R. H., and Graham, W. P. (1983). Productivity of Soils: Assessing Long-Term Changes Due to Erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(1), 39–44Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., and Blair, R. (1995). Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits. Science, 267(24 February), 1117–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesada-Mateo, C. A. (1979). Effect of Reservoir Sedimentation and Stream Flow Modification on Firm Power Generation. Unpublished Ph. D. diss., Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Ralston, S. N., and Park, W. M. (1989). Estimation of Potential Reductions in Recreational Benefits due to Sedimentation. Water Resources Bulletin, 25(6), 1259–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O., Young, C. E., and Shortle, J. S. (1986). Impacts of Water Quality Improvement on Site Visitation: A Probabilistic Modeling Approach. Water Resources Bulletin, 22(4), 559–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M. (1997). The Potential for Economic Valuation of Watershed Protection in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study from Bolivia. Mountain Research and Development, 17(1), 19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, R. (1989). Impactos del Uso de la Tierra en la Alteración del Régimen de Caudales, la Erosión y Sedimentación de la Cuenca Superior del río Reventazón y los Efectos Económicos en el Proyecto Hidroeléctrico de Cachí, Costa Rica. Unpublished MSc thesis, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Eneñanza, Turrialba
Rojas, M., and Aylward, B. (Forthcoming). Mechanisms for Upstream-Downstream Cooperation in Rural Watersheds: The Case of a La Esper-anza: A Small, Private, Hydropower Producer in Costa Rica. In B. Kiersch (Ed.), Watershed-Based Integrated Land and Water Management: Valuation of Land Use Impacts on Water Resources and Mechanisms for Upstream-Downstream Cooperation in Rural Watersheds. Rome: FAO
Ruitenbeek, H. J. (1990). Economic Analysis of Tropical Forest Conservation Initiatives: Examples from West Africa. Surrey, UK: World Wide Fund for Nature
Santos, B. A. (1992). Cost Benefit Analysis of Soil Erosion Control: The Case of Plan Sierra (Dominican Republic). Unpublished Ph. D. diss., University of California, Berkeley
Sheridan, J. M., Lowrance, R., and Bosch, D. D. (1999). Management Effects on Runoff and Sediment Transport in Riparian Forest Buffers. Transactions of the ASAE, 42(1), 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, N. J., Mostaghimi, D. F., Berry, D. F., Reneau, R. B., Hong, S., McClellan, P. W., and E. P., S. (1998). Impact of Riparian Forest Buffers on Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(2), 385–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, D. (1992). The Rationality of Land Degradation in Latin America: Some Lessons from the Ecuadorian Andes, LEEC Gatekeeper Series (Vol. 92-04, pp. 9). London: International Institute for Environment and Development
Southgate, D., and Macke, R. (1989). The Downstream Benefits of Soil Conservation in Third World Hydroelectric Watersheds. Land Economics, 65(1), 38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallard, R. F. (1997). Detailed Report of the Soil and Hydrology Component, Informe Anual del Program de Monitoreo del Canal. Panamá: Programa del Monitoreo del Canal
Stocking, M. A. (1984). Erosion and Soil Productivity: A Review. Norwich: Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia
van Noordwijk, M., and al, e. (1998). Erosion and sedimentation as multiscale, fractal processes: implication for models, experiments and the real world. In F. W. T. Penning de Vries (Ed.), Soil Erosion at Multiple Scales. Wallingford: CABI Publishing
Veloz, A., Southgate, D., Hitzhusen, F., and Macgregor, R. (1985). The Economics of Erosion Control in a Subtropical Watershed: A Dominican Case. Land Economics, 61(2), 145–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertessy, R. A., Watson, F., O'Sullivan, S., Davis, S., Campbell, R., Benyon, R., and Haydon, S. (1998). Predicting Water Yield from Mountain Ash Forest Catchments. Canberra: CRCCH
Vincent, J. R., and Kaosa-ard, M. (1995). Policy Brief: The Economics of Watershed Protection: A Case Study of the Mae Teng River. Cambridge: Harvard Institute for International Development
Walker, D. J. (1982). A Damage Function to Evaluate Erosion Control Economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(11), 690–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, F. A. (1987). Economics of Water Allocation to Instream Uses in a Fully Appropriated River Basin: Evidence from a New Mexico Wild River. Water Resources Research, 23(3), 381–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W. C. (1994). The Study of Sustainable Hydrological Development in Lao PDR. Unpublished Ph. D. diss., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Medford, MA
Young, C. E. (1984). Perceived Water Quality and the Value of Seasonal Homes. Water Resources Bulletin, 20(2), 163–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, M., Thorpe, J. E., and Naiman, R. J. (2001). Fish and Riparian Ecotones: A Hypothesis. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 1(1–2), 11–24Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×