Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T19:26:49.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Physicians and medical futility: experience in the setting of general medical care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2009

Marjorie B. Zucker
Affiliation:
Choice In Dying, New York
Howard D. Zucker
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Alexander Morgan Capron
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Futility – the doctor's dilemma

Patient autonomy, the dominating ethical principle that controls clinical decision making, evolved as a right of patients to be protected from inappropriate and unwanted application of life-extending medical technology. This principle reflects an ethical and legal consensus that serves to define the rights of patients and to set a standard against which physician and institutional actions can be judged.

Unfortunately, no comparable ethical consensus or body of law exists when the issue is not the right of patients to refuse treatment but instead is the limit to their rights to receive treatments. This issue appears when treatments under consideration have little chance to succeed or, on balance, provide little or no advantage to patients compared with the burdens that accompany their implementation. The term medical “futility” has come to encompass this group of problematic treatments.

In the clinical setting, the issue of futility can generally be described as follows: When is the value of a treatment or procedure sufficiently small or uncertain that it can be considered to be futile and, accordingly, the right of patients to choose it should be limited? Who decides that a medical treatment is futile, and what would be an equitable mechanism to establish and put into effect such determinations?

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Futility
And the Evaluation of Life-Sustaining Interventions
, pp. 36 - 47
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×