Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:43:33.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Early money and profit taking in Senate campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

James L. Regens
Affiliation:
Tulane University, Louisiana
Ronald Keith Gaddie
Affiliation:
Tulane University School of Medicine, Louisiana
Get access

Summary

As one-third would go out triennially, there would always be divisions holding their places for unequal terms and consequently acting under the influence of different views and different impulses.

James Madison Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

Among those “different views and different impulses” is the impulse to campaign for reelection. In a cyclical view of the matter, the impulse would be strongest in the class for which election day was closest at hand.

Richard F. Fenno The United States Senate: A Bicameral Perspective

Political scientists have devoted substantial energy to describing the roles played by the major political parties as well as political action committees (PACs) in funding congressional campaigns. Mirroring the assumption succinctly expressed by Madison in The Federalist Number 10 that self-interest motivates political behavior, the national parties and PACs have a strong incentive to provide financial support to their preferred candidates (Herrnson, 1989; Eismeier and Pollack, 1986a, 1986b). Under existing campaign regulations, we can readily observe similar benefit-seeking behavior among politicians, especially incumbents who attempt to exploit their office to garner financial support (Jacobson, 1989; Sabato, 1985). Although a myriad of factors may influence the ability of incumbents to acquire campaign contributions (see Munger, 1989; Poole and Romer, 1985; Gopoian, 1984), the conventional wisdom and empirical research suggest the motivation for legislators to engage in those market exchanges is primarily to protect their reelection prospects (Fiorina, 1989; Mayhew, 1974).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Economic Realities of Political Reform
Elections and the US Senate
, pp. 26 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×