Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T23:44:33.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Understanding the Nature of Fraternalistic Deprivation: Does Group-based Deprivation Involve Fair Outcomes or Fair Treatment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2009

Iain Walker
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Heather J. Smith
Affiliation:
Sonoma State University, California
Get access

Summary

The development of relative deprivation theory is one of the most important advances of social science theory during the twentieth century (Tyler, Boeckmann, Smith, & Huo, 1997; Tyler & Smith, 1997). The importance of relative deprivation theory and research is that it makes clear that people's feelings and behaviors are not simply a reflection of their objective situation. Instead, people interpret their experience, judging it against internal standards. Because people exercise control over the choice of the standards against which they make comparisons, feelings of satisfaction and dissatisfaction are strongly influenced by people's decisions about the alternatives to which their objective situation ought to be compared. A particular situation might be viewed as reflecting relative deprivation if people compare their situation to that of the people around them, while if compared to their past situation, the same situation might seem satisfactory or even overabundant.

Hence, the subjective interpretation of personal experiences is central to the personal and social consequences of those experiences. This key insight of relative deprivation theory suggests the importance of the study of the interpretation of experience, which has become a core aspect of social psychology. This recognition lays the groundwork for the development of theories of social justice, theories that argue that people use principles of justice to identify the feelings of entitlement that shape people's reactions to their outcomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Relative Deprivation
Specification, Development, and Integration
, pp. 44 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×