One of the great virtues of Robert Gordon's essay is to remind us that The Path of the Law started as a speech – and not just a speech, but a speech at a ceremonial occasion – and not just a speech at a ceremonial occasion, but a ceremonial speech belonging to a popular nineteenth-century genre, the vocational address.

But what a vocational address it is! Gordon argues that Holmes “would seem to have shredded all of the fancy costumes in which nineteenth-century lawyers tried to dress up their profession,” that he places “skeptical roadblocks across all of the generally recommended paths for those who would seek meaning and value in the lawyer's work.” I agree; and I agree as well with Gordon's second principal point, that Holmes nevertheless held the lawyer's job in high, sometimes fantastically romantic, esteem. The question is why.

One possible reason that The Path of the Law offers slim pickings for the lawyer's vocation could be that it is not primarily a vocational address. As readers of his speeches know, Holmes had a marvelous sense of occasion, and the occasion of its delivery was the dedication of a law-school building. Perhaps, then, the speech, delivered to law students, is not about how to practice law, but how to study law. The first four words are “When we study law,” and Holmes reminds us of his topic no fewer than ten times.