Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T03:09:07.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Postscript. Disciplines, canons and publics: the history of ‘the history of political thought’ in comparative perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2009

Dario Castiglione
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Iain Hampsher-Monk
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

It is always desirable that a part of the education of those persons who are either born into, or qualified by their abilities to enter, the superior political grades of society, should be instruction in history, and that a part of the study of history should be the history of political theory.

(T.S. Eliot, Notes Towards the Definition of Culture (London, 1948), p. 88)

As a social critic, T.S. Eliot could scarcely be accused of an excess of relativism. Here, his assertion of what is ‘always desirable’ is, of course, part of his coolly mandarin tone, and that tone is the natural vehicle for the assumption that there is a class, largely selected by birth, destined to control the political affairs of a country, an assumption clearly intended as a calculated provocation in the Britain of the 1945 Labour government. The passage is, in these respects, characteristic of the later Eliot's persistent attempt, in the face of disagreeable social change, to appear to be taking the assumptions of the day before yesterday for granted. But as the sequence ‘education’, ‘instruction’ and ‘study’ suggests, one assumption which Eliot could indeed take for granted was that, in referring to ‘the history of political theory’, he was referring to something that was by this date an acknowledged part of an established academic practice. It was, as we shall see, part of his conservatism to presume that the larger academic practice in question was ‘the study of history’, yet even in this detail the passage offers a usefully concise, if somewhat oblique, indication of the themes of this ‘Postscript’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×