Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T18:48:31.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Lexical processing and phonological representation

from Section B - Segment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Gerard J. Docherty
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
D. Robert Ladd
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this paper, we are concerned with the mental representation of lexical items and the way in which the acoustic signal is mapped onto these representations during the process of recognition. We propose here a psycholinguistic model of these processes, integrating a theory of processing with a theory of representation. We take the cohort model of spoken word-recognition (Marslen-Wilson 1984, 1987) as the basis for our assumptions about the processing environment in which lexical processing takes place, and we take fundamental phonological assumptions about abstractness as the basis for our theory of representation. Specifically, we assume that the abstract properties that phonological theory assigns to underlying representations of lexical form correspond, in some significant way, to the listener's mental representations of lexical form in the “recognition lexicon,” and that these representations have direct consequences for the way in which the listener interprets the incoming acoustic–phonetic information, as the speech signal is mapped into the lexicon.

The paper is organized as follows. We first lay out our basic assumptions about the processing and representation of lexical form. We then turn to two experimental investigations of the resulting psycholinguistic model: the first involves the representation and the spreading of a melodic feature (the feature [nasal]); and the second concerns the representation of quantity, specifically geminate consonants. In each case we show that the listener's performance is best understood in terms of very abstract perceptual representations, rather than representations which simply reflect the surface forms of words in the language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×