Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:24:11.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Patriarchy from Above, Patriarchy from Below: Debt Peonage on Nicaraguan Coffee Estates, 1870–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Elizabeth Dore
Affiliation:
University of Southhampton, U.K.
William Gervase Clarence-Smith
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Steven Topik
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

In Latin America, coffee production involved a wide variety of class relations. Before emancipation, many laborers on Brazil's plantations were slaves; after abolition most were colonos. In the nineteenth century in Costa Rica, Venezuela, and parts of Colombia, coffee was produced largely by extended households on family farms. In Nicaragua, Guatemala, and El Salvador, most coffee was produced on large estates that relied on forced labor drafts and debt peonage. Notwithstanding great differences in the class character of coffee-producing societies, some similarities in their gendered character are striking.

Gender relations in Latin America's coffee economies arose largely out of a union of nature and culture: the nature of coffee production and the culture of patriarchy. By nature, coffee harvesting was and remains a laborious process of picking and sorting coffee cherries (which contain beans) one at a time. In many times and places this phase of production tended to be women's and children's work, partly because of their purportedly “nimble fingers” and their low-paid labor. Notwithstanding variations in patriarchal cultures and ideologies, there were powerful similarities in the patriarchal character of societies in Latin America's coffee-producing zones.

An older historiography indicated by commission or omission that the labor force in coffee production was predominantly male. Subsequent research overturned that view, demonstrating that women played an important, sometimes predominant, role in the labor process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×