Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:58:59.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Status of Efforts to Monitor Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Shareen Hertel
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Lanse Minkler
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Audrey R. Chapman
Affiliation:
Chair in Medical Humanities and Bioethics, University of Connecticut's Health Center
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The requirements of article 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (hitherto referred to as the ICESCR or the Covenant) have long complicated efforts to conceptualize and monitor economic, social, and cultural rights. Article 2(1) sets a standard of the gradual achievement of the enumerated rights in the Covenant within the framework of the resources available to do so. In other words, although the goal is the full implementation of the rights enumerated in the Covenant, states parties – the countries that have ratified the instrument – are not required to do so immediately. Instead, states parties are instructed as follows:

Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to take steps, individually and through international assistance and cooperation, especially economic and technical, to the maximum of its available resources, with a view to achieving progressively the full realization of the rights recognized in the present Covenant by all appropriate means, including particularly the adoption of legislative measures.

The standard specified by the ICESCR is often spoken of in a shorthand manner as “progressive realization.” The concept of progressive realization has been described as the “linchpin of the whole Covenant” (Alston & Quinn 1987, 172).

In contrast, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) imposes an immediate obligation for states parties to respect and ensure all of its enumerated rights.

Type
Chapter
Information
Economic Rights
Conceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues
, pp. 143 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, Philip, and Quinn, Gerard. 1987. Nature and Scope of States Parties' Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 9 (2): 156–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, Danie, and Russell, Sage, eds. 2002. Exploring the Core Content of Socio-Economic Rights: South African and International Perspectives. Menlo Park, South Africa: Protea Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Judith R. 2003. International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Obligations of International Assistance and Cooperation. N.p., (prepared for the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), Human Rights Centre, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Chapman, Audrey R. 1996. A “Violations Approach” for Monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (1): 23–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Audrey R. 2002. Core Obligations Related to the Right to Health. In Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, ed. Audrey, R. Chapman and Russell, Sage. Antwerp; Oxford; New York: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Chapman, Audrey R., and Russell, Sage. 2002. Introduction. In Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, ed. Audrey, R. Chapman and Russell, Sage. Antwerp; Oxford; New York: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights. 1994. Question of the realization in all countries of the economic, social and cultural rights contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and study of special problems which the developing countries face in their efforts to achieve these human rights. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/RES/1994/20 (Mar. 1).
Commission on Human Rights. 1996. Question of the realization in all countries of the economic, social and cultural rights contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and study of special problems which the developing countries face in their efforts to achieve these human rights. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/RES./1996/11 (Apr. 11).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 1989. General Comment No. 1: Reporting by States Parties. U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN1 (3rd Sess.).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 1990. General Comment No. 3: The nature of States Parties' obligations (Art. 2, Par.1). U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/ 1/Rev.1 (5th Sess., Dec. 14).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 1998. General Comment No 9: The domestic application of the Covenant. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1998/24 (19th Sess., Dec. 3).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 1999a. General Comment No. 11: Plan of action for primary education. U.N. Doc. E./C.12/1999/4 (20th Sess., May 10).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 1999b. General Comment No. 13, Art. 13. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1999/10 (21st Sess., Dec. 8).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2000. General Comment No. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2000/4 (22nd Sess., Aug.).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2001a. Concluding Observations on France. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1/Add/72, November 30.
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2001b. Concluding Observations on Germany U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1/Add. 63, September 24.
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2002a. Poverty and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Statement of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to the Third United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries. In Report on the twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth and twenty-seventh sessions. U.N. Doc. E/2002/22 (SUPP), Annex VII, Supplement 2.
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2002b. Report on the twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth, and twenty-seventh sessions. U.N. Doc. E/2002/22.
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2003. General Comment No. 15: the right to water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the ICESCR). U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2002/11 (29th Sess., Jan. 20).
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2004. Concluding Observations on Azerbaijan. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1/Add. 104, November 26.
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR). 2005. General Comment No. 16: The equal rights of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights, Art. 3. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2005/3 (34th Sess., May 13).
Fundar, International Human Rights Internship Program, and International Budget Project. 2004. Dignity Counts: A Guide to Using Budget Analysis to Advance Human Rights. Washington, DC: International Human Rights Internship Program.
Hunt, Paul. 2004. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. U.N. Doc. A/59/422 (59th Sess., Oct. 8).
Institute for Human Rights (IHR), Åbo Akademi University. 2005. Report of Turku Expert Meeting on Human Rights Indicators, Åbo, Finland, March 10–13, 2005. http://www.abo.fi/instut/imr/research/seminars/indicators/Report.doc.
International Commission on Jurists (ICJ). 1997. The Maastricht Guidelines. In Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Compilation of Essential Documents, 81–91. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted 16 December 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976), G.A. Res. 2200 (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No.16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), adopted 16 December 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force 3 January 1976), G.A. Res. 2200 (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 49, UN Doc. A/6316 (1966).
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2005. Indicators for Monitoring Compliance with International Human Rights Instruments: Conclusions and Recommendations. Expert Consultation, Geneva, 29 August 2005.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2006. Indicators for Monitoring Compliance with International Human Rights Instruments: Conclusions and Recommendations. Second Expert Consultation, Geneva, 30–31 March 2006.
Robertson, Robert E. 1994. Measuring State Compliance with the Obligation to Devote the “Maximum Available Resources” to Realizing Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 16 (4): 693–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogly, Sirgun. 2003. The obligation of international assistance and co-operation in the International Conventant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbj⊘rn Eide, ed. Bergsmo, Morten. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Türk, Danilo. 1990. The New International Economic Order and the Promotion of Human Rights Progress Report: Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/19 (42nd Sess., July 6).
United Nations. 2004. Compilation of Guidelines on the Form and Content of Reports to be Submitted by States Parties to the International Human Rights Treaties, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/2/Rev.2 (7 May).
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2000. Human Development Report 2000. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). 1993. Report of the Seminar on appropriate indicators to measure achievements in the progressive realization of economic, social and cultural rights. U.N. Doc. A/CONF.157/PC/73 (25–29 Jan.).
World Bank. 1993. World Development Report 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×