Works Cited

Regina Smyth

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511510397.013

Aldrich, John. Why Parties?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexander, Gerard. “Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13, 3, 2001: 249–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney, Verba. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, an Analytic Study. Boston: Little, Brown, 1965Google Scholar

Ames, Barry. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001CrossRef Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, James, M. Snyder Jr., and Charles, Stewart III. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage,” American Journal of Political Science, 44, 1, 2000: 17–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Bahry, Donna, Cynthia, Boaz, and Stacy, Burnett Gordon. “Tolerance, Transition and Support for Civil Liberties in Russia,” Comparative Political Studies, 30 August 1997: 484–510CrossRef Google Scholar

Bianco, William, and John, Aldrich. “A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office-Holders,” Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 16, 2, 1992: 103–15Google Scholar

Black, Gordon S. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives,” American Political Science Review, 66, 1, March 1972: 144–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Brader, Ted, and Joshua, A. Tucker. “The Emergence of Mass Partisanship in Russia, 1993–96,” American Journal of Political Science, 45, 1, January 2001: 69–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Brader, Ted, and Joshua A. Tucker. “It's Nothing Personal? The Appeal of Party Leaders and the Development of Partisanship in Russia,” unpublished manuscript

Bratton, Michael. “Deciphering Africa's Divergent Transitions,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1, 1997: 67–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Buckley, Cynthia, and Regina Smyth. “The Ties That Bind: The Importance of Region in the Construction of Social and Political Citizenship,” in Blair, Ruble and Nancy, Popson, eds., Fragmented Spaces: Russian Regions in Transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. “Rethinking Recent Democratization,” World Politics, 55, 2, 2003: 147–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. “Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6–7, August–September 2000: 703–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. “Regional Differences in Democratization: The East Versus the South,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 14, 3, July–September 1998: 187–211Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?” Slavic Review, 54, 1, Spring 1994: 111–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie, and Maria, Csanadi. “Uncertainty in the Transition: Post-Communism in Hungary,” European Politics and Society, 7, 2, 1993: 240–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce E., John, A. Ferejohn, and Morris, P. Fiorina. “The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament,” American Political Science Review, 78, 1, 1984: 110–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Calvo, Enesto, Abal, Medina, and Juan, Manuel. “Institutional Gamblers: Majoritarian Representation, Electoral Uncertainty, and the Coalitional Costs of Mexico's Hybrid Electoral System,” Electoral Studies, 21, 3, September 2002: 453–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Canon, David T.Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar

Carey, John M., and Matthew, Soberg Shugart. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas,” Electoral Studies, 14, 4, December 1995: 417–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Carothers, Thomas. “The End of the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy, 13, 1, January 2002: 5–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheibub, Jose Antonio. “Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 3, April 2002: 284–312CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth Spiro. “Why Elections Matter,” Washington Quarterly, 23, 3, 2000: 27–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Clem, R. “Urban-Rural Voting Differences in Russian Elections, 1995–1996: A Rayon Level Analysis,” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 38, 7, 1997: 379–95Google Scholar

Colaresi, Michael, and William, R. Thompson. “The Economic Development-Democratization Relationship: Does the Outside World Matter?” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 4, May 2003: 381–403CrossRef Google Scholar

Collier, David, and Steven, Levitsky. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3, 1997: 430–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins. Paths Toward Democracy. The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press, 1999CrossRef Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy J.Parties, Citizens, and Democratic Consolidation in Russia. Presented at Ten Years After the Collapse of the Soviet Union: Lessons and Perspectives, 13–14 October 2000b, Princeton, NJ: unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar

Colton, Timothy J.. Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000aGoogle Scholar

Colton, Timothy J.. “Economics and Voting in Russia,” Post-Soviet Affairs 12, 4, 1996a: 289–318Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy J.. “From the Parliamentary to the Presidential Election: Russians Get Real About Politics,” Demokratizatsiya, 4, 3, 1996b: 371–9Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy J.. “The Politics of Democratization: The Moscow Election of 1990,” Soviet Economy, 6, 4, 1990: 285–344Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy J., and Jerry, F. Hough, eds. Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1993. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy J., and Michael, McFaul. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 2003aGoogle Scholar

Colton, Timothy J., and Michael, McFaul. “Russian Democracy Under Putin,” Problems of Post-Communism, 50, 4, July/August 2003b: 12–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy J., and Michael, McFaul. “Reinventing Russia's Party of Power: ‘Unity’ and the 1999 Duma Election,” Post Soviet Affairs, 16, 3, July–September 2001: 201–24Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy, and Henry Hale. “Context and Party System Development: Voting Behavior in Russian Parliamentary Elections in Comparative Perspective.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association, 3 September 2004. Chicago: unpublished manuscript

Cox, Gary. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems,” American Journal of Political Science, 34, 4, November 1990: 903–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Matthew, McCubbins. Legislative Leviathan:. Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry. “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes,” Journal of Democracy,. 13, 2, April 2002: 21–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry. “Illusions About Consolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, 1996: 34–51Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry, and Richard, Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001Google Scholar

DiPalma, Guiseppe. To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1990Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley, 1966Google Scholar

Easter, Gerald M. “Preference for Presidentialism: Postcommunist Regime Change in Russia and the NIS,” World Politics, 49, January 1997: 184–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Stephen, Hanson. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Jan, Kubik. “Contentious Politics in New Democracies: East Germany, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, 1989–93,” World Politics, 50, 4, July 1998: 574–581CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Claus, Offe, and Ulrich, K. Pruess. Institutional Design in Post-Communist States: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen, Whitfield. “The Evolution of Left and Right in Post-Soviet Russia,” Europe-Asia Studies, 50, 6, September 1998: 1023–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen, Whitfield. “Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe,” British Journal of Political Science, 23, 1993: 521–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferguson, Gary. IFES Russian National Survey Regional Profiles. Washington, DC: International Foundation of Electoral Systems (IFES), 1995Google Scholar

Ferrera, Federico, and Erik S. Herron. “Going It Alone? Strategic Entry Under Mixed Electoral Rules,” 2003, unpublished manuscript. Available at http://www.ku.edu/~herron/, accessed June 2004

Fish, M. Steven. Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996CrossRef Google Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. “The Advent of Multipartism in Russia, 1993–95,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 11, October 1995: 340–83Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Frye, Timothy. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Post-Communist World,” World Politics, 54, 3, April 2003: 308–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Frye, Timothy. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30, 5, October 1997: 523–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. “A Game Theoretic Model of Reform in Latin American Democracies,” American Political Science Review, 85, 1991: 371–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Gelman, Vladimir, and Grigorii, V. Golosov. “Regional Party System Formation in Russia: The Deviant Case of Sverdlovsk Oblast,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 14, 1–2, March–June 1998: 31–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibson, James L. “Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia's Democratic Transition,” American Journal of Political Science, 45, 1, 2001: 51–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Golosov, Grigory V. “From Adygeya to Yaroslavl: Factors of Party Development in the Regions of Russia, 1995–1998,” Europe-Asia Studies, 51, 8, 1999a: 1333–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Golosov, Grigory V.. “History Reports Itself: How the Fatherland – All Russia Alhance is Nothing New, Russian Election Watch, 2 September 1999b: 14–15Google Scholar

Grzymala-Bussa, Anna. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10, December 2003: 1123–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Grzymala-Bussa, Anna. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRef Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Abby, Innes. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1, 2003: 64–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Gunther, Richard. “Electoral Laws, Party Systems and Elites: The Case of Spain,” American Political Science Review,. 89, 3, 1989: 835–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Hale, Henry. Elections, Parties and Democratization in Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Hale, Henry. “Why Not Parties? Supply and Demand on Russia's Electoral Market,” Comparative Politics, forthcoming

Hale, Henry. “Will Elections Erode Russia's Democracy?” Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 24, 1, 2000: 123–31Google Scholar

Hanson, Stephen E. “Instrumental Democracy: The End of Ideology and the Decline of Russian Political Parties,” in , V. Hesli and , W. Reisinger, eds., Elections, Parties and the Future of Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 163–85Google Scholar

Hanson, Stephen E.. “Ideology, Uncertainty, and the Rise of Anti-System Parties in Post-Communist Russia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 14, March–June 1998: 98–127CrossRef Google Scholar

Hanson, Stephen E.. “The Leninist Legacy and Institutional Change,” Comparative Political Studies, July 1995: 306–14CrossRef Google Scholar

Haspel, Moshe, Thomas, Remington, and Steven, Smith. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma,” Journal of Politics, 60, 2, 1998: 417–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Herron, E. S. “Mixed Electoral Rules and Party Strategies: Responses to Incentives by Ukraine's Rukh and Russia's Yabloko,” Party Politics, 8, 6, 2002: 719–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Hewett, Ed A. “Perestroyka and the Congress of People's Deputies,” Soviet Economy, 5, 1, 1989: 47–69Google Scholar

Higley, John and Richard, Gunther, eds. Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar

Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael, C. Munger. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1994CrossRef Google Scholar

Hough, Jerry F., Evelyn, Davidheiser, and Susan, Goodrich Lehman. The 1996 Russian Presidential Election. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1996Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968Google Scholar

Ishiyama, John T. “Candidate Recruitment and the Development of Russian Political Parties, 1993–1999”, Party Politics, 7, 2001: 387–412CrossRef Google Scholar

Ishiyama, John T.. “Candidate Recruitment, Party Organization and the Communist Successor Parties: The Cases of the MSzP, the KPRF and the LDDP,” Europe Asia Studies, 52, 5, 2000: 875–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Ishiyama, John T.. “Political Parties and Candidate Recruitment in Post-Soviet Russian Politics,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 15, 4, 1999: 41–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Ishiyama, John T.. “Electoral Systems Experimentation in the New Eastern Europe: The Single Transferable Vote and the Additional Member System in Estonia and Hungary,” East European Quarterly, 29, 1996: 486–507Google Scholar

Ishiyama, John T.. “Founding Elections and the Development of Transitional Parties: The Cases of Estonia and Latvia, 1990–1992,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 26, 1993: 277–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Ishiyama, J. T., and , R. Kennedy. “Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan,” Europe-Asia Studies, 53, 8, December 2001: 1177–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Ishiyama, John T., and Sahar, Shafqat. “Party Identity Change in Post-Communist Politics: The Cases of the Successor Parties in Hungary, Poland and Russia,” Communist and Postcommunist Studies, 33, 4, 2000: 439–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnston, R. J., and , C. J. Pattie. “Campaigning and Split-Ticket Voting in New Electoral Systems: The First MMP Elections in New Zealand, Scotland and Wales,” Electoral Studies, 21, 4, December 2002, 583–600CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones Luong, Pauline. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRef Google Scholar

Jowitt, Kenneth. “Dizzy with Democracy,” Problems of Post-Communism, 43, 1, January/February 1996: 3–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Karl, Terry Lynn. “The Hybrid Regimes of Central America,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 3, July 1995: 72–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Karl, Terry Lynn, and Phillipe, Schmitter. “What Democracy Is … and Is Not,” Journal of Democracy, 2, 3, Summer 1991: 75–89Google Scholar

Katz, Richard. Democracy and Elections. London: Oxford University Press, 1997CrossRef Google Scholar

Key, V. O.Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf, 1949Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W.Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random House, 1968Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7, August/September 2000: 845–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Interparty Collaboration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRef Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, and Regina, Smyth. “Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging Postcommunist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 10, December 2002: 1228–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Kopstein, Jeffrey, and David, Reilly. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Post-Communist World,” World Politics, 53, 2000: 1–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Kovalev, V. “The Quasi-Party System in the Regions: The Case of the Republic of Komi and the Overall Situation in Russia,” Russian Politics and Law, 39, 2, December 2001: 45–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Kubicek, Paul. “Delegative Democracy in Russia and Ukraine,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 27, 4, 1994: 443–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Levitsky, Stephen L., and Lucan, A. Way. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy, 13, 2, April 2002: 51–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Levitsky, Stephen L., and Lucan A. Way. “Autocracy by Democratic Rules: The Dynamics of Competitive Authoritarianism in the Post–Cold War Era,” October 2002, unpublished manuscript

Lijphart, Arend. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend, and Beverley, Crawford, eds. Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, CA: International and Area Studies, 1997Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend, and Carlos, Waisman, eds. Institutional Design in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996Google Scholar

Linz, Juan. “The Perils of Presidentialism,” Journal of Democracy, 1, Winter 1990: 51–69Google Scholar

Linz, Juan, and Alfred, Stepan. Problems in Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J., and Arturo, Valenzuela, eds. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy,” American Political Science Review, 53, 1, 1959: 69–105CrossRef Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction,” in Seymour, Martin Lipset and Stein, Rokkan, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967, pp. 1–64Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. “Electoral Volatility in Brazil,” Party Politics, 4, 1998: 523–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 2, 1993: 198–228CrossRef Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. “Politicians, Parties, and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, 24, 1, October 1991: 21–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy, Scully, eds. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew, Soberg Shugart, eds. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997aCrossRef Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew, Soberg Shugart. “Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal,” Comparative Politics, 29, 4, July 1997b: 449–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R.Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974Google Scholar

McAllister, Ian, and Stephen White. “The Mixed Member Electoral System in Russia.” Paper available at: http://www.russiavotes.org/

McFaul, Michael. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship, Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, 54, 2, 2002: 212–44CrossRef Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. Russia's Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “Russia's 1999 Parliamentary Elections: Party Consolidation and Fragmentation,” Demokratizatsiya, 8, 1, 2000: 5–23Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “The Perils of a Protracted Transition,” Journal of Democracy, 10, 2, 1999: 4–18CrossRef Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. Russia's 1996 Presidential Election: The End of Polarized Politics. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, 1998aGoogle Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “Uncertainty, Institutional Design and Path Dependency During Transitions: Cases from Russia,” 1998b: unpublished manuscript

McFaul, Michael. “Russian Electoral Politics After Transition: Regional and National Assessments,” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 38, 9, 1997: 507–49Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “Russia Between Elections: The Vanishing Center,” Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, 1996a: 90–104CrossRef Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “Russia's 1996 Presidential Elections,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 12, 4, 1996b: 318–50Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,” World Politics, 47, 2, January 1995: 210–43CrossRef Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael. “Russia's Choice: The Perils of Revolutionary Democracy,” in Timothy, J. Colton and Jerry, F. Hough, eds., Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1999. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1993Google Scholar

McFaul, Michael, Nikolai, Petrov, and Andrei, Ryabov, eds., with Elizabeth, Reisch. Primer on Russia's 1999 Duma Elections. Moscow, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Carnegie Moscow Center, 1999Google Scholar

Michels, Robert. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Gloucester, MA: P. Smith, 1978Google Scholar

Miller, Arthur H., Gwyn, Erb, and Vicki, L. Hesli. “Emerging Party Systems in Post-Soviet Societies: Fact or Fiction?” Journal of Politics, 62, 2, 2000: 455–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Arthur H. and , T. F. Klobucar. “The Development of Party Identification in Post-Soviet Societies,” American Journal of Political Science,. 44, 4, 2001: 667–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, Robert G.Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001Google Scholar

Moser, Robert G.. “Independents and Party Formation: Elite Partisanship as an Intervening Variable in Russian Politics,” Comparative Political Studies, 37, 2, 1999: 147–66Google Scholar

Motyl, Alexander. “Structural Constraints and Starting Points: The Logic of Systemic Change in Ukraine and Russia,” Comparative Politics, 29, 4, July 1997: 433–447CrossRef Google Scholar

Munck, Gerardo, and Carol, Skalnik Leff. “Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, 29, 1997: 343–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Myagkov, Mikhail, and Peter, Ordeshook. “The Trail of Votes in Russia's 1999 Duma and 2000 Presidential Elections,” Communist and Postcommunist Studies, 34, 3, 2001: 353–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Myagkov, M., , P. Ordeshook, and , A. Sobyanin. “The Russian Electorate, 1991–1996,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 13, 2, 1997: 134–66Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa. “Legislative Recruitment,” in Lawrence, Duc, Richard, G. Niemi, and Pippa, Norris, eds., Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, NJ: Sage Publications, 1996Google Scholar

Oates, Sarah. Forthcoming. Tuning Out Democracy: Television and Elections in Russia

Oates, Sarah. “The 1999 Russian Duma Elections,” Problems of Post-Communism, 47, 3, 2000: 3–14CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies,” Journal of Democracy, 9, 1998: 112–26CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo. “Illusions About Consolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, April 1996: 34–51CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo. “Delegative Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 5, January 1994: 55–69CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe, Schmitter. Transitions from Authoritarian: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986Google Scholar

Ordeshook, Peter C. “Institutions and Incentives,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2, April 1995: 46–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Ostrow, Joel M. “Conflict-Management in Russia's Federal Institutions,” Post Soviet Affairs, 18, 1, January 2002: 49–70Google Scholar

Ostrow, Joel M.. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Panebianco, Angelo. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988Google Scholar

Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001CrossRef Google Scholar

Popkin, Samuel L.The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991Google Scholar

Project on Political Transformation and the Electoral Process in Post-Communist Europe, University of Essex, 2003

Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991CrossRef Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. “Some Problems in the Study of Transition to Democracy,” chapter 2 in Guillermo, O'Donnell, Phillippe, C. Schmitter, and Lawrence, Whitehead, eds., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Michael, E. Alvarez, Jose, Cheibub, and Fernando, Limongi. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950–1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRef Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, and Fernando, Limongi. “Modernization: Theories and Facts,” World Politics, 49, 2, 1997: 155–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Susan, C. Stokes, and Bernard, Manin. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRef Google Scholar

Rae, Douglas W.The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1967Google Scholar

Randall, Vicky, and Lars, Svasand. “Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Africa,” Democratization, 9, 3, Autumn 2002: 5–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Ratiani, Natalia, and Olga Tropkina. “Senators May Be Elected Soon: The Federation Council Is on the Threshold of Crucial Reforms,” Izvestiya, June 22, 2004

Reisinger, William M., Arthur H. Miller, and Vicki L. Hesli. “Ideological Division and Party-building Prospect in Post-Soviet Russia,” in Matthew, Wyman, Stephen, White, and Sarah, Oates, eds., Elections and Voters in Post-Communist Russia. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 1999: 136–66Google Scholar

Reisinger, William M., Arthur, H. Miller, and Vicki, L. Hesli. “Political Norms in Rural Russia: Evidence from Public Attitudes,” Europe-Asia Studies, 47, 6, 1995a: 1025–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Reisinger, William M., Arthur, H. Miller, and Vicki, L. Hesli. “Public Behavior and Political Change in Post-Communist Societies,” Journal of Politics, 57, 4, November 1995b: 941–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Reisinger, William, Arthur, H. Miller, Vicki, L. Hesli, and Kristen, Maher. “Political Values in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania: Sources and Implications for Democracy,” British Journal of Political Science, 24, 2, April 1994: 183–223CrossRef Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas F.The Russian Parliament: Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime, 1989–1999. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001aCrossRef Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas F.. “Putin and the Duma,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 17, 4, December 2001b: 285–308Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas F., and Steven, S. Smith. “Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma,” American Journal of Political Science, 42, 2, 1998: 545–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas F., and Steven, S. Smith. “Political Goals, Institutional Context, and the Choice of an Electoral System: The Russian Parliamentary Election Law,” American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1996: 1253–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, William. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science,” American Political Science Review, 74, 4, December 1982: 753–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, Neil. “Classifying Russia's Party System: The Problem of ‘Relevance’ in a Time of Uncertainty,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 14, 1–2, March–June 1998: 159–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives,” American Journal of Political Science, 23, 1, February 1979: 1–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, Richard, William, Mishler, and Christian, Haerpfer. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998Google Scholar

Rose, Richard and Neil, Munro. Elections Without Order. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Samuels, David J., and Matthew, Soberg Shugart. “Presidentialism, Elections and Representation,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 1, January 2003: 33–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E.Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1942Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas. “Taking Uncertainty Seriously: The Blurred Boundaries of Democratic Transition and Consolidation,” Democratization, 8, 4, 2001: 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph A.Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 1994CrossRef Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph A.. Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966Google Scholar

Schmitter, Phillippe. “Parties Are Not What They Once Were,” chapter 2 in Larry, Diamond and Richard, Gunther, eds., Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001, 67–89Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry, Lynn Karl. “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go?” Slavic Review, 53, 1, 1994: 173–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin, 1954Google Scholar

Shevtsova, Lilia. “Russia's Hybrid Regime,” Journal of Democracy, 12, 4, 2001: 65–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Shevtsova, Lilia. “Can Electoral Autocracy Survive?” Journal of Democracy, 11, 3, 2000: 36–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Shvetsova, Olga. “Resolving the Problem of Pre-Election Coordination: The 1999 Parliamentary Election as Elite Presidential ‘Primary,’” in , V. Hesli and , W. Reisinger, eds., Elections, Parties and the Future of Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004Google Scholar

Shvetsova, Olga. “A Survey of Post-Communist Electoral Institutions: 1990–1998,” Electoral Studies, 18, 1999: 397–409CrossRef Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg. “The Inverse Relationship Between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians' Constitutional Choices,” British Journal of Political Science, 28, 1, January 1998: 1–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg. “Executive–Legislative Relations in Post-Communist Europe,” Transition, 2, 25, December 1996: 6–11Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John, M. Carey. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992CrossRef Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Martin, P. Wattenberg, eds. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Thomas, F. Remington. The Politics of Institutional Choice: The Formation of the Russian State Duma. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001CrossRef Google Scholar

Smyth, Regina. “Partisans Without Parties,” Comparative Politics, forthcoming

Smyth, Regina. “Building State Capacity from the Inside Out: Parties of Power and the Success of the President's Reform Agenda in Russia,” Politics and Society, 30, 4, December 2002: 555–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Stepan, Alfred and Cindy, Skach. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarism Versus Presidentialism,” World Politics, 46, October 1993: 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. “The Limited Reach of Russia's Party System: Underinstitutionalization in Dual Transitions,” Politics and Society, 29, 3, 2001: 385–414CrossRef Google Scholar

Taagepera, Rein. “Effective Magnitude and Effective Threshold,” Electoral Studies, 17, 1998: 393–404Google Scholar

Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew, Shugart. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. “The Italian Party System: Between Crisis and Transition,” American Journal of Political Science, 21, 2, May 1977: 193–223CrossRef Google Scholar

Thames, Frank C. Jr. “Legislative Voting Behavior in the Russian Duma: Understanding the Effect of Mandate,” Europe-Asia Studies, 53, 6, September 2001: 869–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsygankov, Andrei. “Manifestations of Delegative Democracy in Russian Local Politics: What Does It Mean for the Future of Russia?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31, 4, 1998: 329–41CrossRef Google Scholar

White, Stephen, Richard, Rose, and Ian, McAllister. How Russia Votes. Chatham, UK: Chatham House, 1997Google Scholar

Yargomskaya, M. “Effect of the Electoral System on the Electoral Strategies of Duma Elections,” in , V. Gelman, , G. Golosov, and , E. Melshkina, eds., The Second Electoral Cycle in Russia, 1999–2000, Moscow: Ves Mir (in Russian), 2002Google Scholar

Zakharia, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, 76, November–December 1997: 22–41CrossRef Google Scholar