Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T10:07:45.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Rise of “Party Committee Factories”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Mark W. Frazier
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Why is it that many industrial enterprises have not been able to break away from old bonds in the systems and methods of management?

editorial, Renmin Ribao (People's Daily), 1965.

China's transition to a command economy in the 1950s created administrative relationships that in effect pulled state industrial enterprises in two directions. Centralized, “vertical” relations emerged as enterprise managers received investment and inputs from, and submitted profits to, central government ministries and commissions in the State Council. At the same time, localized or horizontal relations also developed as municipal and provincial committees of the CCP claimed administrative authority over enterprises within their territorial “jurisdictions.” While local party committees had no legal claim to do so, they frequently usurped managerial prerogatives over wages, bonuses, and other labor management issues. These competing central and local claims on enterprise labor management generated growing tensions over the distribution of jobs, wages, and enterprise welfare benefits. Complicating matters, for central government agencies at least, was the fact that its personnel and departments oversaw by 1957 a total of 58,000 state-owned enterprises and 112,000 jointly owned enterprises, representing an increase of 200 percent from 1955. As the number of industrial enterprises and the administrative burdens to manage them increased, pressure mounted for local authorities to assert greater control over local industry.

The ambiguous lines of authority between the central government departments and local party committees shifted rather suddenly, and decisively, in favor of the latter by late 1957.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Making of the Chinese Industrial Workplace
State, Revolution, and Labor Management
, pp. 196 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×